Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
Not quite. My truth is not contradicting "truth"... it is contradicting your claim.
You right now assert that what I say is "no truth". You are free to do so. And so am I to assert that what you say is "no truth".
Our statements, our assertions, our claims... they contradict. That we both call them "truth" does nothing to show that it is.
You said that this "truth" was demonstrated to you, in a certain way. If you now deny that something that is demonstrated in exactly the same way is also "truth"... you have done nothing but shown that your way of demonstration does not reliably produce "truth".
It seems we need a different way... can you offer one?
Any truth that is "produced" is false truth. Truth cannot be "produced", it is just always true at all times, past, present, future no matter what.
If one has to "produce" a truth to make their argument, then clearly their argument is grounded on false truth, as you've clearly demonstrated here with your admission that you've "produced" this truth.
I just offered a "different way", by pointing out that your argument isn't grounded on the correct understanding of what truth should be and I clearly showed where your argument is faulty.
Now go find a new faulty way to rebuttal or accept that you're wrong.
No, you are misinformed. Eternal means eternal, and you do not enter into it after death, but after spiritual [re-] birth.You mean, the promise of eternal life.
I am not God...so, no. But that is not what I was saying. What I said, is that God has demon-strated by creating the universe. Why don't you ask Him?Can you demonstrate, in any objective way, that your God exists?
That you have to resort to semantic arguments show nothing but that you haven't anything worthwile to offer.Any truth that is "produced" is false truth. Truth cannot be "produced", it is just always true at all times, past, present, future no matter what.
If one has to "produce" a truth to make their argument, then clearly their argument is grounded on false truth, as you've clearly demonstrated here with your admission that you've "produced" this truth.
I just offered a "different way", by pointing out that your argument isn't grounded on the correct understanding of what truth should be and I clearly showed where your argument is faulty.
Now go find a new faulty way to rebuttal or accept that you're wrong.
Oh, I see, when you speak, it is to be declared, the truth.
That straightens everything out.
That wasn't the question. Yes, the natural world is evidence of itself, but that only speaks of part of the "what" of the question. There is also the other [bigger] part of the "what", and then there is the "why." All of which is demon-strated in the existence of God."The world" is the inevitable result of the "existence" (for want of a better term) of primal chaos.
That the world exists is demonstration that this claim is correct.
The truth has been spoken.
Matthew 11:15
"Whoever has ears, let them hear."
This is a Bible verse, because the truth can be found in the Bible.
And in that apparent chaos the has been orderly, purposive potential all throughout the forward progress of life."The world" is the inevitable result of the "existence" (for want of a better term) of primal chaos.
That the world exists is demonstration that this claim is correct.
That you have to resort to semantic arguments show nothing but that you haven't anything worthwile to offer.
Replace "produce" with a term like "demonstrate" (bad style: that demonstration did not demonstrate what this demonstration was claimed to demonstrate)... or, say, "reveal". Or simply "show".
You demonstration does not "do" what you claim it does... or, otherwise, my demonstration does the same... resulting in a contradiction.
It is as simple as that.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?