So is life.
It is an observation. All of the processes in the body can be described as chemical reactions.
Prove it.
Upvote
0
Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
MU experiment is nothing but chemistry.
The idea that man is a product of chemistry is a religious belief.
But living cell isn't just chemistry like a dead cell.
False.
My computer I'm using doesn't explain away the information I'm sending though the internet. The same with life.
Does the plastic DVD explains the movie written on it?
If you don't want to believe the universe exist outside your mind no one can prove it to you.
Prove the making of the movie is just the results of natural processes.Along with the other pieces of AV equipment, yes it does. It explains how those pictures get on the screen and how those sounds are made. The making of the movie and the making of the DVD are also natural processes. Nowhere in the making of a movie is there evidence for the involvement of the supernatural.
Information itself has no mass. I can't prove to you I'm not a computer program since I'm talk to you by going through a computer.I accept that there is a universe that exists outside of my mind.
Now, prove your claim.
"My computer I'm using doesn't explain away the information I'm sending though the internet. The same with life."--Smidlee
Prove the making of the movie is just the results of natural processes.
Information itself has no mass. I can't prove to you I'm not a computer program since I'm talk to you by going through a computer.
It all depends on what you call magic. A movie appear out of thin air in a man's imagination.Which part do you have doubts about? Do you think images appear on the film negative by magic? Do you think the optics of lenses are magic?
I assume you knew I'm referring to "code" and "word" kind of information like found on a movie DVD.All mass has information, including the air around you. Why does that require an intelligence?
It all depends on what you call magic. A movie appear out of thin air in a man's imagination.
I assume you knew I'm referring to "code" and "word" kind of information like found on a movie DVD.
This is a dog chasing it's own tail. In order to study the brain you have to use the very thing you are studying. The real question is who is actually doing the studying?No, it doesn't. Have you never heard of a brain? Do you understand that the brain works through chemistry?
"Neurochemistry is the specific study of neurochemicals, including neurotransmitters and other molecules (such as psychopharmaceuticals, neuropeptides, or gastrotransmitters) that influence the function of neurons. This field closely examines how these neurochemicals influence the network of neural operation."
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Neurochemistry
Now you are changing to subject toward the fine tuned the laws of physics are for life.Single atoms also have codes, including the hydrogen, oxygen, nitrogen, and carbon that are floating around you.
https://www.chemcomp.com/journal/molorbs.htm
In order to study the brain you have to use the very thing you are studying.
The real question is who is actually doing the studying?
are changing to subject toward the fine tuned the laws of physics are for life.
LOL You still are using the thing you are studying , a human brain. You will never get to know a person by studying their brain. Your biological brain will only go as far as someone's else biological brain.No I don't. I can study someone else's brain.
Atoms themselves doesn't explain the genetic code. The genetic code itself doesn't explain the scientist.No, I'm not. I am pointing to the code of atomic orbitals.
http://chemwiki.ucdavis.edu/Physica...Theory/Electrons_in_Atoms/Electronic_Orbitals
It is directly comparable to the information found in DNA.
LOL You still are using the thing you are studying , a human brain.
You will never get to know a person by studying their brain. Your biological brain will only go as far as someone's else biological brain.
Atoms themselves doesn't explain the genetic code.
nope.No, you aren't. I already explained that.
Nope. What you are studying in our brain reactions to our thoughts. There is no evidence of "words" having physical existence.Sure you can. You can say and do things, and look for the reactions the brain makes. You can study this in the words and actions that the brain produces.
Because bottom-up worldview doesn't work.Why not?
nope.
Nope. What you are studying in our brain reactions to our thoughts.
There is no evidence of "words" having physical existence.
Neurobiologist can't speak and think outside their head.Show me a single neurobiologist whose only subject has been his own brain.
Where did this assumption come from except inside your head.The thoughts are the brain's reaction to stimuli.
You are still referring to how our brain reacts yet it doesn't explain the one who doing the explaining. Who is actually doing the watching?There is evidence of specific reactions in brains as caused by spoken sounds and images.
"Imagine tapping into the mind of a coma patient, or watching one’s own dream on YouTube. With a cutting-edge blend of brain imaging and computer simulation, scientists at the University of California, Berkeley, are bringing these futuristic scenarios within reach.
Using functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging (fMRI) and computational models, UC Berkeley researchers have succeeded in decoding and reconstructing people’s dynamic visual experiences – in this case, watching Hollywood movie trailers."
http://news.berkeley.edu/2011/09/22/brain-movies/
Neurobiologist can't speak and think outside their head.
Where did this assumption come from except inside your head.
You are still referring to how our brain reacts yet it doesn't explain the one who doing the explaining.
The only evidence of me you have is through the internet using computers. The same with the brain.You can't hear a neurobiologist speak? Are you deaf?
They came from independent evidence found in the universe around me.
Why not? It shows a direct correlation between brain activity and thoughts.
The only evidence of me you have is through the internet using computers. The same with the brain.
Your mind don't have direct contact with the outside world.
Notice I wrote "your mind". you are assuming exactly as this video points out , that man can explain himself away mechanically.Using fMRI, we can directly measure brain activity. That is more than looking at the outputs.
It most certainly does. Have you not heard of the 5 senses?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?