Cyril of Jerusalem said Mary was not a "channel", and held to the e-v of Mary; you seem to have forgotten one "option".
Clement of Alexandria metaphorically expressed Mary as ever-virgin.
No, Clement says scripture is the ever-virgin, not Mary.
"
But, as appears, many even down to our own time regard Mary, on account of the birth of her child, as having been in the puerperal state, although she was not. For some say that, after she brought forth, she was found, when examined, to be a virgin.36663666 [A reference to the sickening and profane history of an apocryphal book, hereafter to be noted. But this language is most noteworthy as an absolute refutation of modern Mariolatry.]
Now such to us are the Scriptures of the Lord, which gave birth to the truth and continue virgin,"
ANF02. Fathers of the Second Century: Hermas, Tatian, Athenagoras, Theophilus, and Clement of Alexandria (Entire) - Christian Classics Ethereal Library
IOW, Clement, like Cyril, is saying Mary did not remain a virgin. Such to us are the scriptures that gave birth AND continue virgin. Clement is very clear, very explicit about what is the e-v (scriptures of the Lord) and what is not (mary). Mary gave birth and her virginity was over.
So, at that time, there was no choice but 1 of 2.
Upvote
0