zippy2006
Dragonsworn
- Nov 9, 2013
- 7,641
- 3,846
- Country
- United States
- Gender
- Male
- Faith
- Catholic
- Marital Status
- Single
It's factually incorrect that what gaara presented was the definition of an appeal to authority.
He never claimed it was. Those are just three words ("appeal to authority"), not a proper noun. He explained that when someone appeals to an authority outside of their field of expertise the appeal is fallacious. That's correct. Trying to claim that it is incorrect is just playing word games.
Fallacies, just like words, have definitions.
No, not really. The lexicon is nowhere near as universally agreed-upon, and the populations that make frequent use of stock fallacies are basically amateur philosophers and internet forum-goers. They are more often mis-used than used.
Just like I don't write out the definition for every word I use, I can cite a fallacy instead of writing out the entire definition. It's no different from saying something like "computer" instead of writing out, "an electronic device for storing and processing data, typically in binary form, according to instructions given to it in a variable program."
Some people use words without knowing what they mean. Lots of people use "fallacies" without knowing what they mean. Gaara gave the substance, demonstrating he understands the actual meaning.
Last edited:
Upvote
0