And that proves what exactly? That's why it's called Dualism.
How is showing that physical stimuli change the decision-making process evidence of Dualism?
Doesn't state the brain makes decisions, it's analogous to someone punching another and causing them to physically retaliate, now did the punch cause them to decide?
It was one of the causes, obviously.
or someone eating sugar, feeling physically good, and then happy affecting their decisions, they ultimately choose their decisions.
The evidence is not conclusive here. Often our conscious mind is only aware of decisions after they are made. And other times our conscious mind takes credit for making decisions that weren't actually decisions in the first place (i.e. it'll take credit for actions which others have done if the conditions are correct). There's a lot of interesting research here, but none of it points towards what you are claiming.
also who said physical cannot affect mental states? they can affect them, but not control them.
Many physical stimuli can control them. That's the whole point of anesthesia, to give but one obvious example.
what I'm saying is that the mind cannot be physical, sure the physical can affect the immaterial mind, but no way does it control or is the mind.
Yes, you're saying this. The problem is you're giving no reason to believe you.
I could easily prove the reverse in mental to physical, for example shame, which causes physical stress, when shame has no physical property.
You know what's more convincing that telling us you can do something? Actually doing it.
if we were purely physical then hearing someone tell you they love you is no different physically then saying they hate you.
No reason to believe this. Physical effects take on lots of forms - no reason to assume they're all the same.
the mind isn't the brain, you've been refuted.
Post your CV, please. If you're going to ask us to blindly accept your assertions I'd at least want to know what areas of neuroscience you work in professionally.
Upvote
0