PsychoSarah
Chaotic Neutral
Uh, no, the Navajo had no written language. Neither did the Incas. In fact, literacy for most of human history was less common than illiteracy
Upvote
0
Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
These people did write in characters. In which the ancient Indians used symbols and the Egyptians hieroglyphics.
The Navajo did honor God the Father with the name, "Great Spirit."
Again, not the point, your whole deal was that written language was necessary to show humans existed, something you keep dodging is that many societies provably had no written language.
Who on earth fed you that tripe?
You just gave an explanation natural selection that practically defines cause and effect.'Natural selection' denies cause and effect.
Cause: different colors of fur blend better or worse into the background.I guessing that low survival rates for mice whose coloration contrasts with their environment (easily seen and eaten) is more responsible than the background color of that environment. If this is 'natural selection' at work I agree. The predators 'select' the easy prey leaving the more difficult prey to pass on their coloration.
False dichotomy. There is a least one more choice: random mutations, genetic drift, gene flow, and other mechanisms affect the individual and natural selection determines whether those changes offer a benefit or not.It's a mysterious process that has no reason to function. Purposeful creation on the other hand is the logical explanation for change or improvement of an organism over time. The question is a simple one; either the organism changed or improved itself at the most fundamental level, of it's own volition, or an external force did it.
This makes no sense. If there is intelligent planning involved, why are the mutations in any given population essentially random? Why don't all individuals have the same mutations?It's not illogical to credit an external force when one can perceive intelligent planning in the effort.
One point... And don't you ever forget it... The spirituality is in the heart!
Groove Is In The Heart Music Video - YouTube
Does drawing pictures count? Because we have cave art from 30,000 years ago.Because we are human! It is in our intelligent nature to write about things!
Does drawing pictures count? Because we have cave art from 30,000 years ago.
But that would be a lie. Why would you want to believe a lie just to support a woodenly literal interpretation of Genesis?Can't be sure of the timing. Knock about 27,000 years off your clock and I will believe it.
But that would be a lie. Why would you want to believe a lie just to support a woodenly literal interpretation of Genesis?
One can't put dating on hen scratching on a wall!
Of course you can date the pigments used to produce the pictures. Where did you get the idea you couldn't?One can't put dating on hen scratching on a wall!
Of course you can date the pigments used to produce the pictures. Where did you get the idea you couldn't?
I have some beachfront property in Arizona to sell you.... $30,000 an acre.
I have some beachfront property in Arizona to sell you.... $30,000 an acre.
Pretty impressive logic, wouldn't you say?Let me see if I understand your counter argument .
You don't believe we can date such things, therefore we can't .
Brilliant.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?