Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
dad said:All your reason for deep space claims involve distance which involves our space and laws. That means it is way out of your depth.
How about physics description of parallel universe, is that real?Good thing the Bible's description of heaven isn't real, then.
If they always apply then why do we have quantam physics?We have reasons (aka evidence) to believe that the laws of the universe apply everywhere and anytime.
Jazer said:If they always apply then why do we have quantam physics?
Can't cope with science being exposed eh. That's OK. Feel free to blather on about nothing.So you can't back up your word. Thanks for playing. Now take your little ideas and go sit back at the kiddie table.
In their head it may be..How about physics description of parallel universe, is that real?
Better you be clear. Others may read this that know not what bit that you refer to as "it"..I read your posts, and still would like you to be honest and clear.
The part you think science deals in or can.
Then what is 'it' that is science you are talking about specifically? Think about 'it'. It might come to you.
After milk and apple pie? Yes, that would be nice, whatever you are jabbering about this time.
Not sure, what is 'that'?? You really have some contraction curve balls here. Impressive.
YouTube - ‪daffy duck‬‏Then I say your limits are clear, and standards are exposed.
....then I say....
Utter rubbish. It doesn't match history or the bible. You have no proof for it. The tooth fairy might explain all the same things...in other words you have no clue.The way you phrased it sure seems like you just forgot.
In any case, the IT refers to the idea that the past was the same as the present, in that the laws of the universe that apply today applied millions of years ago. Working with such an assumption explains everything we see, and it does not say that we should be seeing things that don't exist in reality. In short, the idea that the past was the same as the present matches perfectly with reality. You have not provided a single shred of evidence to support your claim.
The long life spans and the spirits. Spirits do not live or rule in the world of men directly. Check it out. What Obama is a spook?? Harper is a ghost? Sarkozy is a gnome?Do you actually know what specific means? It means "in detail." Please provide details about which exact parts of history indicate that the laws of the past were different to the laws of the present. These details must - MUST - be checkable!
Example?The idea of investigating reality to find out about reality is unfamiliar to you?
What reality? Says who? When? Where? You think that tossing out another contraction helps you? Watch out people, he use the word "that"!Like I said, the "THAT" which I refered to was investigating reality to find out about reality.
Is this some new creationist technique? Play dumb and hope the other person gives up or forgets what they were talking about?
This is an example of the same creo physics used to prove "Same State Past":That helps your defeated same state past claims??
What YEC in their right mind would want to prove a same state past fable?This is an example of the same creo physics used to prove "Same State Past":http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NWzROoxS2b4&feature=related
That's crazy, neither the Bible nor I think the past was the same. That would be science. Thanks for that. Good luck.YOU?
Can't cope with science being exposed eh. That's OK. Feel free to blather on about nothing.
Actually some people make an honest effort and contribute thoughtful arguments, and try to scrape up evidence. You seem to have gone the Poe way.I'll leave that up to you. That seems to be your specialty.
Actually some people make an honest effort and contribute thoughtful arguments, and try to scrape up evidence. You seem to have gone the Poe way.
In Poe kind. If you had the goods, you wouldn't have had to resort to that.Well, I can only try for so long before I give into the impulse to respond in kind.
In Poe kind. If you had the goods, you wouldn't have had to resort to that.
Reort to what, dad -- calling blather blather?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?