Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
Great. Nothing wrong with the limits and nature and space we were put in. Just do not try to make it universal.I like fishbowls.........
Unless you support parallax, all of cosmology crumbles. Too bad you can't.admitting??lol! as if it were a secret? It's a direct measurement method which is how we know other methods work too. It seems you can't (or won't?) see the forest for all those damned trees! That's your own doing.
Time does exist and is part of all of our solar system and area. No one can take a slice of this time and space and then simply call it space alone, and draw a line to the stars trying to make the space and time (distance) equal.Of course time exists, it's just the trigonometry is "A-Time-ist", just like I'm "A-Theist" we get through our respective thing unhindered by such irrelevancies...
I use the word in context of Genesis and the bible with Jesus creating it just as it says.At no stage have I ever claimed there was "no creation", I just don't have any reason to think it is a creation.
You admitted fails in predictions in sn1987a... Predictions that are then matched by observations!
Nope. The earth was without it's finished form. Not the universe! The stars were created later.How do you know? I thought in the beginning, "Formless Void" or something? That doesn't look like a universe that matched predictions made from a very hot dense plasma state... you're rubbing your own nose in it now...
except we use it to observe distant galaxies that match the predictions based on exactly the same phenomena.
And a flashlight look like a star if it is far away. We do not go by what things look like to you. Sorry.Whatever bends light in the far universe looks exactly like the same thing we see bending light here!!
Nothing works anywhere but here.Incorrect, we have ALL the reasons to apply it universally, because it WORKS!
No.Can we put the lack of your ability to point out your God in the same bucket as astronomers inability to point out an identifiable remnant??
Too bad the observations/evidence constantly, and predictably destroys your former beliefs eh? Fool us once, shame on us. Fool us many times, and shame on us. Your religion lost credibility. Sorry. Totally... absence of evidence is not evidence of absence. That we haven't identified anything yet is not a failed prediction/expectation - if it turns out we learn something new and adjust the model to better represent reality, then Great!
Creation is nip and tuck in absolute constant total agreement with how I read the bible.Now, Will you do the same for all the evidence for your religious interpretation being so demonstrably wrong when we observe your God's creation showing only things that contradict your view?
Old Neb is still around. You know that much? In the right time he will walk there...of course.Point him out then, might as well point out where Nebuchadnezzar walked the streets of Tyr as prophecised before it became a peninsular and not important anymore.
I've never seen a confirmed prophecy from the bible yet let alone 100%, that's hilarious!
No. You claimed stuff and were busted...over and over and over and over and over. That gets tiresome.What?? We learned things about the universe and adapted it to our model of the universe to make it more accurate??lol! That's exactly what Science is supposed to do!!!
That is the quintessential definition of science!If it didn't, then we might as well be a Religion spouting nonsense and irrelevant falsities as if they were true,
Since you were wrong to start with you are not updating knowledge in any way. You are just tweaking a fable.never updating our knowledge in the face of facts that show it to be wrong..
So saying God doesn't cover it?
All invented dreams inserted into the bible. No one thought that before a perceived need to make the bible fit what science taught..at any cost.
So Adam would not have lived forever if he ate the tree of life, but was only alive on some temporary work visa? Ha.
That depends if Jesus is God. If so, then I find it unlikely you would be able to tell us the difference. But silly time wasting quibbling aside, the point was that we may have been made of dust by Him, but it wasn't stardust.No, since Lord God which is translated from the Hebrew YHWH, is a singular name and God (Elohim-The Judges) is the plural name of God the invisible Spirit. If you don't know the difference between Jesus and His invisible Spiritual Father, you will NEVER understand Genesis.
Except you invented the billions of years thingie.Projection, since that's what you always do. I support what I write with the agreement of Scripture with Science and History. It helps to eliminate the "invented dreams".
The tree of life was not reaalllly the tree of life then? What was it, some billion year own twig?Amen, since God knew before He made Adam that he would sin since Adam was made from the air, dust and water which was contaminated with death because it was made apart from God. Anything apart from God is subject to death, including Adam, the entire Cosmos and you. God sees the end from the beginning. Isa 46:10
Are you seriously going to declare all of mathematics to be wrong too??Unless you support parallax, all of cosmology crumbles. Too bad you can't.
Yep! The ONLY WAY you can support your own faulty fantasies, is by declaring all of reality to be false??Time does exist and is part of all of our solar system and area. No one can take a slice of this time and space and then simply call it space alone, and draw a line to the stars trying to make the space and time (distance) equal.
Oh, well, we know that to be false - so that's literally a non-starter.I use the word in context of Genesis and the bible with Jesus creating it just as it says.
Nope, try again.You admitted fails in predictions in sn1987a.
Nope! That's two strikes and two misses now....!You seem to think that only your religion can claim credit for creation microwave background. No.
And we know that's false too - Earth is made up of the remnants of earlier stars that went supernova - so necessarily had to come from the coalescing of material ejected from a star that lived and died in spectacular fashion before it.Nope. The earth was without it's finished form. Not the universe! The stars were created later.
If by "cook up ever changing new stories", you mean "form the best model that fits reality", then Yes, yes we do. because that's what works.Baloney. The galaxies spin differently act differently and etc etc in many cases than theory expected. Science scrambles to cook up ever changing new stories to try and include the ever busting evidences!
to your layperson interpretation, sure. Not to those who know what they're looking at though.And a flashlight look like a star if it is far away. We do not go by what things look like to you. Sorry.
Bald assertion with no foundation (no, your fantasy wishes aren't a foundation, they are baseless conjecture).Nothing works anywhere but here.
He's done no such thing. I haven't seen him - I'll even go out on a limb and say You haven't seen him either. ( Exodus 33:20 )No.
God pointed Himself out just fine.
Wholly get that you don't understand reality - Same for your God, I guess.... for an allegedly omnipotent, omniscient being, he misses the mark every time...Too bad the observations/evidence constantly, and predictably destroys your former beliefs eh? Fool us once, shame on us. Fool us many times, and shame on us. Your religion lost credibility. Sorry. Totally.
Creation is nip and tuck in absolute constant total agreement with how I read the bible.
Only your baseless beliefs falsely labeled science oppose them...and that matters not a whit.
nope. Feel free to point him out tho since you hallucinate him too.Old Neb is still around. You know that much?
..... "One day, I'll be Right!" - dad.In the right time he will walk there...of course.
Of Course! You have to have the right indoctrination into the right interpretation of the right religion, Right dad??You just can't recognize them.
Well, that just demonstrates your complete misunderstanding of how science works in the first place. It isn't like your interpretation of your religion where you have to be 100% committed to every faulty belief written down by people who had at least a 1700 year outdated understanding of how the universe worked.No. You claimed stuff and were busted...over and over and over and over and over. That gets tiresome.
Nope, that's your religious interpretation to a "T", exactly what science doesn't do as you've already acknowledged.That is the quintessential definition of science!
....which is updating knowledge, your jabby insults aside... nice of you to acknowledge the fact.Since you were wrong to start with you are not updating knowledge in any way. You are just tweaking a fable.
Only when little letters like C for light speed or T for time or etc etc are used in the math that is supposed to represent the far universe. Fishbowl math is fine here IN the fishbowl.Are you seriously going to declare all of mathematics to be wrong too??lol!
Sorry you thought that you knew that story as fact. We see you can't tell the difference.And we know that's false too - Earth is made up of the remnants of earlier stars that went supernova - so necessarily had to come from the coalescing of material ejected from a star that lived and died in spectacular fashion before it.
Call it what you like. Te problem is that to 'reconstruct' reality after each of the inevitable predictable proven fails, you can only reach into your little fishbowl bag of tricks to pull out something else to try and patch up the ever busted fables.If by "cook up ever changing new stories", you mean "form the best model that fits reality", then Yes, yes we do. because that's what works.
The religiously indoctrinated are taught to believe certain things that form their belief about what the are seeing.to your layperson interpretation, sure. Not to those who know what they're looking at though.
One minute you claim God is hidden from man, the next you quote His revealed word to man.He's done no such thing. I haven't seen him - I'll even go out on a limb and say You haven't seen him either. ( Exodus 33:20 )
I understand both actual reality, and your ever changing little fishbowl religious versions of it. There should be stiff fines for evos to even use the word.Wholly get that you don't understand reality - Same for your God, I guess.... for an allegedly omnipotent, omniscient being, he misses the mark every time...
Believe what you like. Do not offer it as more than that.Of Course! You have to have the right indoctrination into the right interpretation of the right religion, Right dad??
There is no faulty beliefs in the bible. You seem to be admitting science is just a faulty belief?Well, that just demonstrates your complete misunderstanding of how science works in the first place. It isn't like your interpretation of your religion where you have to be 100% committed to every faulty belief written down by people who had at least a 1700 year outdated understanding of how the universe worked.
I would expect that that which is known fact would not need to be taken daily to the trash, where it gets traded for other garbage and sprayed with science scent perfume.....which is updating knowledge,
For you, sure. Excuse me while I go with well-evidenced science.Only when little letters like C for light speed or T for time or etc etc are used in the math that is supposed to represent the far universe. Fishbowl math is fine here IN the fishbowl.
I have Evidence, you have conjecture.Sorry you thought that you knew that story as fact. We see you can't tell the difference.
Projecting still, I see...Call it what you like. Te problem is that to 'reconstruct' reality after each of the inevitable predictable proven fails, you can only reach into your little fishbowl bag of tricks to pull out something else to try and patch up the ever busted fables.
Let me fix that for you: "The religiously indoctrinated are taught to believe certain things that form their belief despite what they are seeing, unlike science and rational thinkers." - Much better...The religiously indoctrinated are taught to believe certain things that form their belief about what the are seeing.
Nope, I quote what is claimed to be his revealed word to man despite never having been demonstrated as such.One minute you claim God is hidden from man, the next you quote His revealed word to man.
No you don't, you have no understanding of actual reality, who are you kidding...??I understand both actual reality, and your ever changing little fishbowl religious versions of it. There should be stiff fines for evos to even use the word.
Sure. I believe you believe your prophecies are 100% fulfilled, just like Muslims believe their prophecies are 100% fulfilled, and the Jews believe their prophecies are 100% fulfilled, etc...Believe what you like. Do not offer it as more than that.
Well, I certainly grant that science (along with everyone's beliefs) are imperfect. Science though, has all the evidence and is the best way by which we can discern fact from fiction. Religion though is just assertion without foundation.There is no faulty beliefs in the bible. You seem to be admitting science is just a faulty belief?
Facts aren't taken to the trash let alone traded for garbage, Science isn't a scent either, I know you with all these assertions and suppositions would suit you much better if they were true, but I know even you know your interpretation of your religion is untenable in the face of all the evidence to the contrary...I would expect that that which is known fact would not need to be taken daily to the trash, where it gets traded for other garbage and sprayed with science scent perfume.
Jesus did the demo.For you, sure. Excuse me while I go with well-evidenced science.
I have Evidence, you have conjecture.
Projecting still, I see...
Let me fix that for you: "The religiously indoctrinated are taught to believe certain things that form their belief despite what they are seeing, unlike science and rational thinkers." - Much better...
Nope, I quote what is claimed to be his revealed word to man despite never having been demonstrated as such.
You believe science predictions fulfilled...ZzzzSure. I believe you believe your prophecies are 100% fulfilled, just like Muslims believe their prophecies are 100% fulfilled, and the Jews believe their prophecies are 100% fulfilled, etc...
You have no foundation to claim time exists as we know it here in deep space. No foundation to claim nature was the same on earth in the far past. You have assertions running amok.Well, I certainly grant that science (along with everyone's beliefs) are imperfect. Science though, has all the evidence and is the best way by which we can discern fact from fiction. Religion though is just assertion without foundation.
So the stuff science discards as not valid anymore are not traded for more stuff that is also based on the same ground/fishbowl rules as the previous trash? The scent of science is quite detectable. The arrogant ignorance fragrance is smelt far and wide, regardless of whether the priests and disciples of science are so immersed in it they can't smell it.Facts aren't taken to the trash let alone traded for garbage, Science isn't a scent either, I know you with all these assertions and suppositions would suit you much better if they were true, but I know even you know your interpretation of your religion is untenable in the face of all the evidence to the contrary...
Then you'd have to agree that nobody in the past 19 centuries or so has seen that demo...Jesus did the demo.
Nope, I have demonstrations of those predictions. You do too, every time you fire up your networked device to deny that science right there in your hands...You believe science predictions fulfilled...Zzzz
We have every foundation, that we can see the spectrum of light is but just one data point of that evidence...You have no foundation to claim time exists as we know it here in deep space. No foundation to claim nature was the same on earth in the far past. You have assertions running amok.
So the stuff science discards as not valid anymore are not traded for more stuff that is also based on the same ground/fishbowl rules as the previous trash? The scent of science is quite detectable. The arrogant ignorance fragrance is smelt far and wide, regardless of whether the priests and disciples of science are so immersed in it they can't smell it.
Your religious opinions on life in general are off topic. It is the religious opinions related to science that are of import here.Then you'd have to agree that nobody in the past 19 centuries or so has seen that demo...
Sorry, detecting some radiation in the universe is not a demo of your religious predictions any more than it is a demo that it was a creation remnant background. Your religious fantasy ALSO requires some background radiation...whoopee do.Nope, I have demonstrations of those predictions. You do too, every time you fire up your networked device to deny that science right there in your hands...
You see that here on earth. Not sure how you would cite fishbowl vision as evidence of...anything at all...in the far far far universe?We have every foundation, that we can see the spectrum of light is but just one data point of that evidence...
Science is of the fishbowl and works in the fishbowl. That has no relation to your fantastic fables from the far side.LOL! STILL Projecting?? oh, dear... You keep ignoring the bit where science works & yields useful and practical results!
I don't have religious opinions aside I don't accept that claim...Your religious opinions on life in general are off topic. It is the religious opinions related to science that are of import here.
Not just detecting a bit of radiation, we specifically predicted the type and amount of radiation that would be detected based on a model that matched and predicted a wide array of other observations and predictions. I have a feeling you're just being disingenuous in a vain attempt to play down the obvious, because you know you're wrong.Sorry, detecting some radiation in the universe is not a demo of your religious predictions any more than it is a demo that it was a creation remnant background. Your religious fantasy ALSO requires some background radiation...whoopee do.
Because it matches the predictions we make!You see that here on earth. Not sure how you would cite fishbowl vision as evidence of...anything at all...in the far far far universe?
.... and everywhere else too....Science is of the fishbowl and works in the fishbowl....
Well, it does, and does so quite well - so good luck with that!....That has no relation to your fantastic fables from the far side.
You can call your demonstrated unsupportable beliefs anything you like and deny till the cows come home.I don't have religious opinions aside I don't accept that claim...
Not just detecting a bit of radiation, we specifically predicted the type and amount of radiation that would be detected based on a model that matched and predicted a wide array of other observations and predictions. I have a feeling you're just being disingenuous in a vain attempt to play down the obvious, because you know you're wrong.
Show your great education by showing us what was predicted that somehow negates a created universe and radiation fro that?Because it matches the predictions we make!lol! I don't believe you seriously don't understand that - I get the US education system is pretty bad, but surely you couldn't have undone this much education that you can deny reality altogether... Come on!
why, Thank you.You can call your demonstrated unsupportable beliefs anything you like and deny till the cows come home.
Show a working model for how it supports yours then - you won't have anything besides "Goddunnit!" because something that explains everything, effectively explains nothing. Scientific models on the other hand explain quite a lot, even if not everything and are therefore able to be practically applied to problems to give usable solutions, something you will never be able to do with your "Goddunnit!" model. Such a model gives no useful predictive results.Sorry, what you need/predict is not unique to some godless uncreated universe.
Again for the umpteenth time, I never said this universe couldn't have been created. Work on your comprehension.Show your great education by showing us what was predicted that somehow negates a created universe and radiation fro that?
Scientific theories and the models base on them consistently give predictive useful solutions. That's why your government along with all the governments worth their salt teach Science and scientific theories through their public education systems, it's because they have real world uses and consistently yield practically applicable solutions which have real world economic and technological advantages to them. Why do you think all those governments push the sciences through their education systems? Do you think the indian government hates Shiva & Brahma? Does the Saudi Arabian government hate Allah & his final prophet, Mohammed? Does the US government hate your particular interpretation of your particular version of your particular religion?Let's review your religion has a long string of repeated failed predictions, and wild unsupportable claims, and declares 95% of the universe unknown dark stuff. Yet you beg us to believe anyhow.
If it wasn't the other way round it might. However the best strategy for evos at this juncture seems to be to study to learn what words actually mean, like evidence.why, Thank you.does it bother you that pretty much all the evidence supports my position and doesn't support yours?
I am not here to pretend little man has all the knowledge of the workings of God and creation. Science has stod up to proclaim it knows about where we came from. I simply showed that this was a vile religioous claim with no merit in fact.Show a working model for how it supports yours then - you won't have anything besides "Goddunnit!" because something that explains everything, effectively explains nothing. Scientific models on the other hand explain quite a lot, even if not everything and are therefore able to be practically applied to problems to give usable solutions, something you will never be able to do with your "Goddunnit!" model. Such a model gives no useful predictive results.
Then say something! Was it? Or not? What, if anything are you saying?I never said this universe couldn't have been created.
Scientific theories and the models base on them consistently give predictive useful solutions.
For the origins issues they give false prophesies, failed so called predictions, and hand waving ra ra ra go team go stump speeches.
Are you suggesting governments are good and know best? I suggest they have agenda to please the people and fool the people and rule the people, and molest the people in some cases...such as in Canada where the government set up the church to run the first nations schools and mass molestation ensued.That's why your government along with all the governments worth their salt teach Science and scientific theories through their public education systems, it's because they have real world uses and consistently yield practically applicable solutions which have real world economic and technological advantages to them.
Their father inspires them?Why do you think all those governments push the sciences through their education systems?
Not sure why anyone cares what the government pushes? They are a bunch of crooks and cons in large measure who are easy tools of the dark side.Do you think the indian government hates Shiva & Brahma? Does the Saudi Arabian government hate Allah & his final prophet, Mohammed? Does the US government hate your particular interpretation of your particular version of your particular religion?
Lemme guess, we should equate 'evidence' with 'baseless and unfounded imagination' like you do?If it wasn't the other way round it might. However the best strategy for evos at this juncture seems to be to study to learn what words actually mean, like evidence.
You've showed no such thing. The facts are, we can predict, and have predicted numerous things about the universe around us based on the science involved. Religion (yours included) has not predicted anything useful. Ever.I am not here to pretend little man has all the knowledge of the workings of God and creation. Science has stod up to proclaim it knows about where we came from. I simply showed that this was a vile religioous claim with no merit in fact.
Again, I don't know how the universe got started. Both science and all the various religions have ideas or claims respectively, but nothing that can be tested either way. I have to say though, given science has a verified history of successful predictions over all religions by far, I'd be inclined to have a soft opinion that follows scientific models if one ever becomes testable, though any testable model (scientific or religious) that passes such testing would do.Then say something! Was it? Or not? What, if anything are you saying?
Well, that's just wishful nonsense on your part. These models work, no matter what you imagine in your fantasy universe.For the origins issues they give false prophesies, failed so called predictions, and hand waving ra ra ra go team go stump speeches.
It's because it provides real economical and technical benefits, it softens the burden on the health and welfare systems by maximising medical sciences and enabling better food production and creates a technological and science export opportunities that in turn benefit the citizens of that nation.... but I suspect you know this quite well.Are you suggesting governments are good and know best? I suggest they have agenda to please the people and fool the people and rule the people, and molest the people in some cases...such as in Canada where the government set up the church to run the first nations schools and mass molestation ensued.
Their father inspires them?
Ahh, a conspiracy theorist...Not sure why anyone cares what the government pushes? They are a bunch of crooks and cons in large measure who are easy tools of the dark side.
That depends, are we talking about the cunningly devised fables of your religion and what they call evidence, or are we talking actual evidence?Lemme guess, we should equate 'evidence' with 'baseless and unfounded imagination' like you do?
Facts are you failed routinely and predictably. Fact is your religion seeks to take credit for and explain away creation with any ever changing hogwash it needs to grasp onto in an ever changing frenzy of deception and obfuscation and denial.You've showed no such thing. The facts are, we can predict, and have predicted numerous things about the universe around us based on the science involved. Religion (yours included) has not predicted anything useful. Ever.
So you don't know, yet preach a certain way. OK.Again, I don't know how the universe got started. Both science and all the various religions have ideas or claims respectively, but nothing that can be tested either way. I have to say though, given science has a verified history of successful predictions over all religions by far, I'd be inclined to have a soft opinion that follows scientific models if one ever becomes testable, though any testable model (scientific or religious) that passes such testing would do.
N. They don't. They are shoved into the fishbowl philosophy and physics box, and seem like a fit to your religion.Well, that's just wishful nonsense on your part. These models work, no matter what you imagine in your fantasy universe.
Origins provides nothing ever in any way whatsoever and never will. Unless you count fable making make work projects as benefits?It's because it provides real economical and technical benefits,
Strange delusion.it softens the burden on the health and welfare systems by maximising medical sciences and enabling better food production and creates a technological and science export opportunities that in turn benefit the citizens of that nation.... but I suspect you know this quite well.
The kingdoms of the world are ruled by Satan at the moment, although he has certain limits. Sorry to inform you it is not all heaven and laughter and truth on earth right now, as much as that seems like a conspiracy to the uninformed.Ah, a conspiracy theorist...
Obviously evidence because 'cunningly devised fables of my religion' is a made up non-existent thing.That depends, are we talking about the cunningly devised fables of your religion and what they call evidence, or are we talking actual evidence?
Easy to fix then, provide some evidence for your fantasy interpretations.Facts are you failed routinely and predictably. Fact is your religion seeks to take credit for and explain away creation with any ever changing hogwash it needs to grasp onto in an ever changing frenzy of deception and obfuscation and denial.
I haven't preached anything at all about the cause of the universe, that's an outright false statement. So much for "christian values", or do you subscribe to the "it's okay to Lie for Jesus!" school of thought?So you don't know, yet preach a certain way. OK.
If your electronics work for you to be able to post here on the internet, then yes, it works. That's hands-down proof you're deluded to think otherwise. Funnily enough, these conditions match perfectly with our observations of the far universe. You can't explain it otherwise, yet you'll stand fast on these deluded ideas without any supporting foundation whatsoever - which is why you'll rightly be seen as a crank by rational people.N. They don't. They are shoved into the fishbowl philosophy and physics box, and seem like a fit to your religion.
Well, Science is all about explaining reality as best it can, and that's what reality tells us. Would you be more comfortable if Science just made bald assertions without foundation and doggedly stuck to it despite any evidence to the contrary, like you and most other religions and religious interpretations in general?'95% of the universe is invisible dark stuff or energy...that fits!'
Yep, it sure does. Vaccines, drug and treatment testing, study of cures for cancer and other genetic diseases, so on. It seems those science 'fables' are providing real-world benefits every day...Origins provides nothing ever in any way whatsoever and never will. Unless you count fable making make work projects as benefits?
lol! No refutation of the facts then.Strange delusion.
Definitely a conspiracy, uninfomed as I am... Just to point out though, it isn't me denying a universe of facts and evidence billions and billions of light years across to protect an obviously deluded worldview based on an untenable interpretation of a religion...The kingdoms of the world are ruled by Satan at the moment, although he has certain limits. Sorry to inform you it is not all heaven and laughter and truth on earth right now, as much as that seems like a conspiracy to the uninformed.
Science does exist.Obviously evidence because 'cunningly devised fables of my religion' is a made up non-existent thing
Science of man is too small to handles it. To top it off they have rejected the truth of God from the outset, so they miss the truth in all they see. Their inventions are lying vanities when it comes to their anti creation fables.Easy to fix then, provide some evidence for your fantasy interpretations.
Science does though and you have been blindly and loudly cheer leading for it's whoppers.I haven't preached anything at all about the cause of the universe, that's an outright false statement.
? Nonsensical rambling. Nothing about our phones or tv has anything to do with deep space.If your electronics work for you to be able to post here on the internet, then yes, it works. That's hands-down proof you're deluded to think otherwise. Funnily enough, these conditions match perfectly with our observations of the far universe.
Yes I can explain it easily. Science is totally out to lunch and must remain in the absolute dark and can never possible find the truth despite their frenzied learning. The world and stars were created.You can't explain it otherwise, yet you'll stand fast on these deluded ideas without any supporting foundation whatsoever - which is why you'll rightly be seen as a crank by rational people.
They are about explaining away creation, and inventing godless whoppers for pay. Hired denizens of darkness.Well, Science is all about explaining reality as best it can, and that's what reality tells us.
Science is about deception and instilling doubt in creation. They religiously strive to make their cunning devised fables believable by trying to incorporate partial knowledge and truths in with the woven web of directly Satan inspired demon talk.Would you be more comfortable if Science just made bald assertions without foundation and doggedly stuck to it despite any evidence to the contrary, like you and most other religions and religious interpretations in general?
None at all of which have the remotest connection to origin fables.Yep, it sure does. Vaccines, drug and treatment testing, study of cures for cancer and other genetic diseases, so on. It seems those science 'fables' are providing real-world benefits every day...
Do you feel that mankind all through history was engaged in some conspiracy in saying spirits lived?Definitely a conspiracy, uninfomed as I am...
There are no billions of light years that is all in your head and part of a religion of darkness.Just to point out though, it isn't me denying a universe of facts and evidence billions and billions of light years across to protect an obviously deluded worldview based on an untenable interpretation of a religion...
Us either.Us rational people aren't impaired by a foggy disbelief of reality and what it tells us.
The evidences cannot lead. What leads origin fable manufacturing is the religious criteria by which they weld facts, and filter all things.We're free to follow the evidence where it leads without the tainted apriory beliefs that lead to false views of the universe we're in
Which has zero to do with godless origin sciences.. Thankfully, that's why scientists are able to give real-world solutions to real-world problems all day, every day.
We don't have to worry about some invisible fantasy universe of demons, spirits and magical goings on in some ethereal plain as if it were happening right here.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?