- Nov 25, 2017
- 4,861
- 1,022
- Country
- United States
- Faith
- Christian
- Marital Status
- Private
Science now says they have identified a subatomic particle that is the mirror image of matter, and have studied it for so many seconds. They say if its counterpart touches both are destroyed. They also say at the Big Bang there were equal amounts of matter and anti-matter, but then somehow the anti-matter decreased and only matter was left, i.e., our material world of today.
Scientists, like their ideas on evolution too, think that anti-matter theory is real, and that they have observed it. If one looks at the old Ying/Yang philosophy, the eastern dialectic of polar opposites that exists in nature, then one could easily assign that principle to everything in the universe, including the theory of anti-matter. In other words, is it possible scientists simply believe something is true, and then go about trying to prove it? Yeah, that's actually the ticket, it's called the Scientific Method. So have they really... proven the existence of anti-matter, that's the real question.
Possibly they have only discovered just another sub-atomic level of the material universe they didn't know about before. It's still about the material universe. In essence, it means they aren't really any closer to discovering 'how' the Big Bang could have happened. They only have just come to another level of proof of God's creation of the worlds.
Heb 11:3
3 Through faith we understand that the worlds were framed by the word of God, so that things which are seen were not made of things which do appear.
KJV
Paul was teaching creation science right there in Hebrews 11.
That part in red is about the first law in thermodynamics which says, matter can neither be created nor destroyed, but can only change forms (solid, liquid, gas, vapor).
That law proves that material matter did not... create itself. And mind you, that applies to the whole material universe, for it is all included in the realm of material matter.
Since science well knows matter didn't create itself, then that is proof in itself that material matter was created. Thus their Big Bang theory reveals this idea too. Scientists have to admit it, as that law of thermodynamics demands it. This is where the division among what scientists believe starts. Some scientists recognize the existence of God as Creator of all things. Others don't. The point is, belief in a Creator does not interfere with the study of true science.
What the atheistic scientist isn't willing to admit is that something outside of material matter had to be the origin of it, and that origin cannot be matter itself, nor anti-matter. That is what Hebrews 11:3 shows us, material matter did not create itself. So maybe anti-matter did, right? No, because if the proof of the existence of anti-matter is what today's scientists claim, then it's just another 'part' of materialistic creation, and not proof of what created it.
Scientists, like their ideas on evolution too, think that anti-matter theory is real, and that they have observed it. If one looks at the old Ying/Yang philosophy, the eastern dialectic of polar opposites that exists in nature, then one could easily assign that principle to everything in the universe, including the theory of anti-matter. In other words, is it possible scientists simply believe something is true, and then go about trying to prove it? Yeah, that's actually the ticket, it's called the Scientific Method. So have they really... proven the existence of anti-matter, that's the real question.
Possibly they have only discovered just another sub-atomic level of the material universe they didn't know about before. It's still about the material universe. In essence, it means they aren't really any closer to discovering 'how' the Big Bang could have happened. They only have just come to another level of proof of God's creation of the worlds.
Heb 11:3
3 Through faith we understand that the worlds were framed by the word of God, so that things which are seen were not made of things which do appear.
KJV
Paul was teaching creation science right there in Hebrews 11.
That part in red is about the first law in thermodynamics which says, matter can neither be created nor destroyed, but can only change forms (solid, liquid, gas, vapor).
That law proves that material matter did not... create itself. And mind you, that applies to the whole material universe, for it is all included in the realm of material matter.
Since science well knows matter didn't create itself, then that is proof in itself that material matter was created. Thus their Big Bang theory reveals this idea too. Scientists have to admit it, as that law of thermodynamics demands it. This is where the division among what scientists believe starts. Some scientists recognize the existence of God as Creator of all things. Others don't. The point is, belief in a Creator does not interfere with the study of true science.
What the atheistic scientist isn't willing to admit is that something outside of material matter had to be the origin of it, and that origin cannot be matter itself, nor anti-matter. That is what Hebrews 11:3 shows us, material matter did not create itself. So maybe anti-matter did, right? No, because if the proof of the existence of anti-matter is what today's scientists claim, then it's just another 'part' of materialistic creation, and not proof of what created it.