- Jun 18, 2006
- 3,856,411
- 52,717
- Country
- United States
- Gender
- Male
- Faith
- Baptist
- Marital Status
- Married
- Politics
- US-Republican
Upvote
0
Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
So would atheists.Muslims would say that Jesus is not the son of God,
Ditto.... you both can't be right, but you can both be wrong.
He is helping you to understand, but he uses reverse psychology for lack of a better name, so you do not know your being helped. He wins his argument when you proclaim him to be wrong. It is a great tactic because creationists are so often proclaimed to be wrong on this board no matter what evidence they produce. So he plays your game and beats you at it just about every time. People have a lot of respect for him because he is so good at beating people at their own game.
Ask Split Rock.I suppose AV1611VET could help someone understand the wilder shores of fundamentalist literalist dispensensationalist beliefs, although I can't imagine anyone being very interested in that in anything but a "you'll never guess what he's saying now" kind of way. Other than that I'm at a loss as to how you come to the above conclusions.
Right, just as most people have never been to the stars. So we see the starlight star bright shining through our window at night. Here, where the laws we know are all we assume exists anywhere. How provincial.
Ask Split Rock.
Stopping the sun would do nothing, to make the day longer the earth would need to stop spinning, but of course they knew nothing of that did they? only fools and the gullible would believe those stories, do you believe them dad?
I did not deny that he is helping me to understand. Even the evasion of the remainder of my post is an answer in itself.He is helping you to understand, but he uses reverse psychology for lack of a better name, so you do not know your being helped.
So he wins the argument, but is still wrong. Good point, Jazer.He wins his argument when you proclaim him to be wrong.
I will agree with this. So often wrong, they would be happy to win any argument.It is a great tactic because creationists are so often proclaimed to be wrong on this board no matter what evidence they produce.
Just not in any way that you can demonstrate.So he plays your game and beats you at it just about every time.
Even if that were true, it would not 'poof' his deity into existence.People have a lot of respect for him because he is so good at beating people at their own game.
What does God being unchanging have to do with a stretched out space or firmament, and what laws exist in areas far from earth? If a third of the stars fall to the earth, how big could they really be?It's Biblical. God is a rock and unchanging. Here or There.
Now if you have some evidence or scriptures or even supporters,
that would be interesting.
Nope. The area that was affected was not the earth. It was a battle area on earth in the 'holy' land. We are fools for Christ's sake, and believers do believe it, yes indeed.Stopping the sun would do nothing, to make the day longer the earth would need to stop spinning, but of course they knew nothing of that did they? only fools and the gullible would believe those stories, do you believe them dad?
If time and laws were suspended in a local area, then that means that normal laws were out the window.
No. In this present state and time we have a certain nature and normal set of laws. In local situations, this can be and is overridden when God adds the spiritual component to this. Not all of man's universe is changed but just the affected person or area for the duration of the miracle.But you usually support different laws for different times and places.
I am not allowed to say what everyone is thinking am I?
Any better ideas or some flaw in this concept?
What do we hear from you?? Shall we simply ask you who is right, and who is brainwashed? This is not a beauty contest where you are the judge. Your lowly job here is to talk intelligently and with some sort of unblonde substance.
You might be surprised. Until one begins to look at what we actually know, and what the facts actually are, one would tend to think that it is crazy to question the foundational beliefs of science. Once ones looks honestly however, one realizes that the basis for old age godless wild claims of science is quite defeatable.I am not allowed to say what everyone is thinking am I?
Is that good or bad?I dated a real good looking Blonde once. She was da Bomb.
I should think that if what fast froze the water was that stuff, it might be rare now! Also we need to ask if we even know exactly what it was. We also need to look at how rare any substance may have been in the former state as well as deep under the earth, and possibly space also. There is therefore no way to limit the freezing substance in the far past.
- Liquid nitrogen is rare.
Under normal conditions in this present state, maybe. However, have a planet upchuck oceans of water, and heaven knows what else came with it! For example large deposits of salt!? The evidence is startling and mounting.Under ground gasses tend to dissipate
Say what? This has what to do with water from the wormholes of space, or the fountains of the deep?? If you mean water NOW covers most of the globe, that is irrelevant to the pre flood time.
- Water would condense most gasses and does cover most of the globe.
I agree. But when the ice age came, that would have changed fast in many parts of the earth! Just look at all the ice even still here!The early earth temps were likely very moderate.
What is now trapped in this present time would have resulted in many cases from the flood, so I guess I would tend to agree.Most trapped resources suggest they came from catastrophic events rather than caused them.
Right, I would suspect that when the continents moved fast that produced some heat! Of course even if almost none was produced if the separation was in the former state, we must ask whether there final little movements were in this state, which would explain volcanism, large lava areas, and mountain ranges that are from 'molten' rock.
- Underground temperatures are mild to warm.
I produce evidence all the time, where would you like to start?Creationists produce evidence? that would be a first, I think everyone would like to see that happen, even you.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?