The head of Trump’s antisemitism task force just re-posted two antisemitic X accounts

[essentialsaltes]

Leo Terrell, the Department of Justice lawyer who heads the Federal Task Force to Combat Antisemitism [is a] media-savvy former Fox News contributor

First, on Wednesday, Terrell re-posted a comment by Patrick Casey, the former leader of the now-defunct white nationalist group Identity Evropa, whose members chanted, “Jews will not replace us,” during the violent 2017 Unite the Right rally in Charlottesville, Va.

I noted, but didn't post about, Trump's disrespectful comment about Schumer. But even if Terrell doesn't know who Patrick Casey is, he should know that saying someone "is not a real Jew" is antisemitic.

[AI: Yes, the statement "not a real Jew" is antisemitic because it denies someone's Jewish identity and can be used to delegitimize or marginalize Jewish individuals and communities.]

 

[Chesterton]

[AI: Yes, the statement "not a real Jew" is antisemitic because it denies someone's Jewish identity...

Yes or No question: Am I a real Jew?

 

[Pommer]

Yes or No question: Am I a real Jew?

Loaded question

 

[Chesterton]

Joe Biden: "...if you have a problem figuring out whether you’re for me or Trump, then you ain’t black."

 

[The IbanezerScrooge]

Joe Biden: "...if you have a problem figuring out whether you’re for me or Trump, then you ain’t black."

Non-sequitar, tu quoque, deflection.... This thread is about what convicted felon Trump said about a sitting member of Congress.

Curious, what did the convicted felon mean by that? Like, is that an insult? Was he degrading him by calling him a Palestinian obviously incorrectly? I mean, it's obviously wrong and Schumer certainly is not a Palestinian any more than the convicted felon is an innocent man, but what's the connotation here?

To be sure, we all know. I'd just love to hear it out loud.

 

[The IbanezerScrooge]

Yes or No question: Am I a real Jew?

We don't know unless you divulge that info. How is that relevant?

 

[Chesterton]

Non-sequitar, tu quoque, deflection.... This thread is about what convicted felon Trump said about a sitting member of Congress.

Curious, what did the convicted felon mean by that? Like, is that an insult? Was he degrading him by calling him a Palestinian obviously incorrectly? I mean, it's obviously wrong and Schumer certainly is not a Palestinian any more than the convicted felon is an innocent man, but what's the connotation here?

To be sure, we all know. I'd just love to hear it out loud.

He's using rhetoric. The connotation is that Schumer's on the side of the bad guys - Hamas.

Do you realize that in about 5 sentences you said "convicted felon" 3 times?

We don't know unless you divulge that info. How is that relevant?

That info is divulged under my avatar (or lack of avatar). I'm an Eastern Orthodox Christian. So yes or no, am I a real Jew?

 

[The IbanezerScrooge]

He's using rhetoric. The connotation is that Schumer's on the side of the bad guys - Hamas.

But Palestinians are not inherently Hamas. Palestinian is a nationality. Hamas is a political organization that has been designated a terrorist organization. Just because someone is Palestinian does not make them a member of Hamas or even a supporter.

Do you realize that in about 5 sentences you said "convicted felon" 3 times?

Yes, and I will continue to do so as long as it remains true. Our elected president is a convicted felon. A third of this country knowingly voted for a convicted felon and an adjudicated rapist to be the president of the country. Those are just facts.

That info is divulged under my avatar (or lack of avatar). I'm an Eastern Orthodox Christian. So yes or no, am I a real Jew?

I don't care. It's irrelevant to the topic of the thread.

 

[Chesterton]

But Palestinians are not inherently Hamas. Palestinian is a nationality. Hamas is a political organization that has been designated a terrorist organization. Just because someone is Palestinian does not make them a member of Hamas or even a supporter.

Irrelevant to the point he was making.

Yes, and I will continue to do so as long as it remains true. Our elected president is a convicted felon. A third of this country knowingly voted for a convicted felon and an adjudicated rapist to be the president of the country. Those are just facts.

No, Bill Clinton was a known rapist. Joe Biden was a known rapist. But Fact Check: Was Donald Trump found guilty of rape?

I don't care. It's irrelevant to the topic of the thread.

I didn't ask you whether you cared.

 

[The IbanezerScrooge]

Irrelevant to the point he was making.

Yes it is. You just don't want to admit that the convicted felon was being an anti-Semite at the same time as he was denigrating a whole nationality of people. 'Cause that's what he was doing.

No, Bill Clinton was a known rapist. Joe Biden was a known rapist. But Fact Check: Was Donald Trump found guilty of rape?

Joe Biden was never accused of rape and so could certainly not be a "known rapist" except in right-wing fever dreams. I did not say Trump was found guilty of rape. Convicted felon Trump was ADJUDICATED a rapist by a judge who, in his decision to award damages to a woman who sued Trump for sexual assault, including rape, and harassment stated that it was more likely than not that the convicted felon had committed the acts she was accusing him of based on the evidence presented in court.

I didn't ask you whether you cared.

But that's what I said, so...

BTW, how many times did I use "convicted felon" that time since you're keeping track?

 

[NxNW]

No, Bill Clinton was a known rapist.

Bill Clinton never raped anyone.

Joe Biden was a known rapist.

Joe Biden never raped anyone.

But Fact Check: Was Donald Trump found guilty of rape?

The judge says yes.