anonymous person
Well-Known Member
He (@anonymous person) really doesn't get it. He thinks it's about pride. Yet who in this thread isn't willing to admit even the possibility of error? It's him.
Possibilities come cheap.
Upvote
0
Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
He (@anonymous person) really doesn't get it. He thinks it's about pride. Yet who in this thread isn't willing to admit even the possibility of error? It's him.
If you had told us that you weren't willing to support your positions or answer questions, but that you had no qualms about deceit and plagiarism, then you would have indeed saved us some time.
As do baseless accusations of pride from individuals too conceited to recognise it in themselves.Possibilities come cheap.
One must find amusement somehow. Hypocrites are easy targets.And yet I have a strange feeling you will keep engaging me in discussion.
As do baseless accusations of pride from individuals too conceited to recognise it in themselves.![]()
That sounds like someone I would respect.
Sounds like someone admirable.
She wants to earn her way in life? She has my vote for President.
Let's see... intellectual integrity, standing on her own two feet, and values intellect and knowledge. She must have been told that she passed the test and was offered a special place in heaven as a reward. Oh, but wait, that would be rational and ethical.
eudaimonia,
Mark
That's a good insight, Jeremy: now apply it to yourself (for once).God has said that sin and pride keeps men from realizing their desperate situation. That's either true or false. So your qualm is really not with me, but with the bible.
Good to finally have you say it. That is, that you are here for amusement. Since that is the case and you have said it, I will for the time, refrain from speaking with you.One must find amusement somehow. Hypocrites are easy targets.
"He just wants a relationship with you... And to save you from what he will do to you if you don't reciprocate his 'love.' Isn't that just wonderful?!"I remember wanting to make a thread about themes of defeatism within christianity. Posts like this (and so many others) reek of the whole "lay down and give up" attitude which seems to be a prerequisite for a relationship with an all powerful entity which "loves you".
The thing is, I realized that had I created the thread...I would've simply been told that I was misunderstanding christianity, that there were no themes of "you're a pathetic human being until you submit completely to god".
I remember wanting to make a thread about themes of defeatism within christianity. Posts like this (and so many others) reek of the whole "lay down and give up" attitude which seems to be a prerequisite for a relationship with an all powerful entity which "loves you".
The thing is, I realized that had I created the thread...I would've simply been told that I was misunderstanding christianity, that there were no themes of "you're a pathetic human being until you submit completely to god".
Well, I didn't say that I was here for amusement. Rather, what I implied was that I get quite a bit of amusement from your posts. You hold yourself in such high regard, Jeremy, and yet your tactics are so blatantly disingenuous. It's no wonder that you were banned from The Thinking Atheist. You want to be taken seriously, but you cannot be taken seriously while you continue on this path. That's why I'm amused. You're chasing your tail.Good to finally have you say it. That is, that you are here for amusement. Since that is the case and you have said it, I will for the time, refrain from speaking with you.
So your qualm is really not with me, but with the bible.
If you would have told me this at the start, it would have saved us both much time.
I don't have any problems with the Bible. It's some of the best fiction I've ever read, and even Christians may read it symbolically rather than literally. I do have problems with certain interpretations of the Bible, and those problems necessarily are with certain living individuals, not with ink on paper.
eudaimonia,
Mark
A literal reading of Genesis is untenable, for example.The bible is comprised of 66 pieces of literature. These pieces range in genre from historical narrative to poetry.
Labeling it some of the best fiction you have ever read belies a gross generalization of it's contents.
Name one account that you have evidence is fictional.
Name one account that you have evidence is fictional.
Much of the Old Testament is almost certainly written centuries after the events described therein had allegedly happened.
http://www.independent.co.uk/news/l...ld-testament-storeis-are-fiction-1500431.html
As amusing as this diversion may be, I still don't have any problems with a book -- only the interpretations that someone might have of that book.
eudaimonia,
Mark
Are you willing to change your view about this?
Why are you so concerned about this issue? The point of my post (#592) is that different people may interpret a book in different ways. That means that one has qualms with interpretations of books, not with the books themselves. I wasn't making any claims about the historicity of the Bible. That is completely off topic to my point.
eudaimonia,
Mark