Anything unclear about the OP?
The interesting point here is that you are implicitly admitting that "The Greatest Conceivable Being" isn´t a proper definition that can be argued against.
I am totally calm.
That´s good to know.
Upvote
0
Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
Anything unclear about the OP?Well, it seems to me that if you wanted to know about the phrase in question and how I use it
I am totally calm.Calm down and take a deep breath sir.
That´s good to know.The world is not going to come to an end, just yet.
So this thread is not about the phrase "greatest conceivable being"?
It is a phrase. So I explicitly, not implicitly, affirm it is not a definition.Anything unclear about the OP?
The interesting point here is that you are implicitly admitting that "The Greatest Conceivable Being" isn´t a proper definition that can be argued against.
I am totally calm.
That´s good to know.
Please tell quatona how you come to that conclusion. He seems to be unable to understand how people can come to such conclusions.Such a being would be vastly superior to any god I've ever heard of. As such, the petty details of those gods is really irrelevant to the topic here.
Oh no. People in general want to be comfortable and at ease. Hell is no such place. They want to live lives of pleasure and in general have an aversion to suffering, pain, and judgment and punishment.
I know that is how I am anyway, that is, my carnal natural self.
I guess I could just ask you a hypothetical question.
Assuming that you either go to one of two places once this life passes away, where would you want to go?
Heaven or hell?
Well the concept of hell is comprehensible...I'm not sure what's to be expected in heaven though. Care to enlighten me?
Care to answer the question you quoted?
I did...what part don't you understand?
I understood everything you said.
I just asked if you were going to answer the question.
Now if you don't know what heaven is, I can tell you what it is.
If I were to attempt to come up with "The Greatest Conceivable Being", I wouldn't start with someone that has been dead for 2000 years.I think this actually serves a point I am making.
For some, they find God to be offensive. He is just really a bad guy. To be compelled to spend eternity with such a bad person would be a very bad thing. God understands how you feel about Him and does not want you to have to spend eternity with Him if you don't want to.
The thing is, if what the new testament authors says is true, we all are appointed to die once, and then we are judged for what we have done with the lives God has given us, whether good or bad. Those who rejected God's offer of salvation through His Son Jesus, will answer for their own doings and will receive what their works merit. Those who have been covered and have had the blood of Jesus applied to their lives and have gone on to show this regeneration by good works, will receive eternal life.
I don't think anyone really has any misgivings about being free. That seems to be the rallying cry by most today. "I want to be free to live, to let live, and to do with my body what I please! Free from religion, free from oppression, etc. etc."
I know of no people who have ever marched the streets by the thousands chanting, "Down with freedom, and up with oppression!"
Nor do I think anyone really has any misgivings about people being justly judged for the evil they commit. I mean, with all of the indignation I see from people here about certain things they judge to be evil, I am pretty sure we can all agree that we should not only judge justly, but should encourage the just judgment of the people who do that which is deserving of judgment.
Nor do we really have any misgivings about love. We recognize that love is a two way street and as such, it can always be received or rejected and we can always love others or make excuses for why we should not love.
I think the real issue, is that Jesus of all people, is most offensive to some because He claimed that people, at the end of the day, are fundamentally, broken. That there is a way that men ought to live, and know it, but fail to and as a result of this failure, they are estranged to their Creator. That there is One greater than man who knows all, sees all, and is above all, Holy and that because of this, will hold us all accountable. Inside of this and actually over it all, stands the cross. The cross is offensive to many because it is a symbol of how nasty we are. The cross is ugly. It is nasty. And deep down inside, the cross is something that testifies against them. What better way for some to deal with this ugly reality, but to shut their eyes and ears and pretend it does not exist, or that if it exists, it is nothing more than the creation of a handful of superstitious Jews.
Islam is feared and hated by many because it poses a threat to their physical well-being. Christianity is feared and hated by many because it poses a threat to that part of them which is not just atoms and matter. Jihadists can be fought and their efforts can be quelled with the appropriate socio-economic and geopolitical responses. But you cannot fight against Christ and win. The long procession of the attempts throughout history to do so reveal that the bible is the anvil that has worn out many a hammer. The Church, that universal body of believers throughout the world and throughout the ages remains. It grows not despite the oppression, censorship, and persecution it faces, but through it. Augustine and Aquinas rightly pointed to this fact as the miracle God has furnished for all to behold and marvel. It was no less than Napoleon himself who spoke of Christ as being the Great Conqueror who cares not for men's lands or territories, money or national resources, but yea, for the very hearts of men themselves.
I think the best thing for all of us here would be to drop the pretense and just state plainly what the real issues are. We can all be politicians, we can all be politically correct. That is easy. Just say nothing. Or if you say something, see to it that whatever you say is sufficiently ambiguous or is qualified by "this is true for me but might not be for you" and you will do well.
At the end of the day it is recorded that Jesus made some claims that are unique to Him and Him alone. Thus, they are worthy of at minimum, our thoughtful consideration.
In the hypothetical let heaven stand for that eternal state of affairs wherein the redeemed dwell in intimate and uninterrupted communion and fellowship with God and hell stand for that eternal state of affairs wherein the unredeemed dwell apart from God.That's what I'll need in order to answer the question...
I agree with you and I reckon we are not the only ones that would start elsewhere.If I were to attempt to come up with "The Greatest Conceivable Being", I wouldn't start with someone that has been dead for 2000 years.
So you admit it was not a good idea to present it as a definition?It is a phrase. So I explicitly, not implicitly, affirm it is not a definition.
I´m sure you can figure the difference between "arguing against the existence of the Greatest Being Conceivable", and arguing against the phrase.As far as not being able to argue against it, you are doing just that.
I´m not arguing against the phrase. I am arguing against your idea that this phrase is a definition that allows an argument against the existence of its referent.In fact, this whole thread is you arguing against the phrase.
In the hypothetical let heaven stand for that eternal state of affairs wherein the redeemed dwell in intimate and uninterrupted communion and fellowship with God and hell stand for that eternal state of affairs wherein the unredeemed dwell apart from God.
Now, if such places existed, where would you prefer to dwell?
I do understand it quite fine.Please tell quatona how you come to that conclusion. He seems to be unable to understand how people can come to such conclusions.
A being is greater than an island.
Please tell quatona how you come to that conclusion. He seems to be unable to understand how people can come to such conclusions.
Since he's here in this very thread, I don't need you to tell me what he may or may not think about something I've written. You have enough to worry about with the problems with your own posts, no need to start making mistakes attempting to ghost-write for other people in thread.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?