Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
Wisdom.
He who has not read Proverbs, is far less the wise for it than if he had.
I've read the Bible cover to cover, there's some good advice in there, and some not so good advice. Nothing is mind shatteringly impressive though.
I don't need to excuse the Bible. If you don't remember anything, but go the extra mile, the extra mile alone you will go. If you don't remember anything but turn the other cheek, the other cheek you will turn alone. These things were told to you that you might live, if you want to keep it to yourself, you will live by yourself.
There will be more than enough people in future who will call the Bible impressive, without someone complaining that they don't like some of the advice it gives needing to be remembered.
When I was a Christian (Anglican) I read the bible entirely (yes all the way through) at aged 13 and again when I was about 17 during my time in a Christian boarding school. I again made numerous attempts as a young adult but always gave up partway. Anyway it didn't matter to me about reading it entirely again as I believed it was the inspired word of God and I had read it entirely twice before. At least that was the reason I used to justify to myself why I stopped reading it. Now older with more wisdom I know why. Because I wasn't satisfied that is why. Everybody seemed to refer to it as the good book, but to me it was anything but. The best way to keep my faith was to actually avoid reading it and focus on the good parts my priest would choose for his sermons.
Anyway...
If you have read the bible entirely(honesty here please folks) what makes you conclude that the bible is a good book?
You essentially say that you stopped reading it because it had some sad or bad parts in it and that made it unsatisfying to you.
The question I have is: If a book came from God, why would you expect it not to have a record of the sad or bad in it? It seems to me that it would record the sad as well as the bad along with the happy and good about life. If it were a book from God, it would necessarily have to be a complete book, and of course we know that the book would not be complete if there were not therein recorded the good along with the bad.
Except some of the bad (actually a lot of it) is commanded by god. So the (in theory) all-good god does bad things.
That may be why many people read the bible and doubt its reputation of moral perfection.
I am not aware of anything that God commanded that was bad. Are you?
I am not aware of anything that God commanded that was bad. Are you?
How about orders to wipe out entire towns, murder the inhabitants and keep the virgin women as sex slaves?
Stoning to death?
Deuteronomy 22-23-24 KJV
23 If a young woman who is a virgin is betrothed to a husband, and a man finds her in the city and lies with her, 24 then you shall bring them both out to the gate of that city, and you shall stone them to death with stones, the young woman because she did not cry out in the city, and the man because he humbled his neighbors wife; so you shall put away the evil from among you.
Well, stoning people to death doesn´t sound like promoting the paradigms of harmonious living to me. To me it sounds like being concerned with the law being kept, more than it sounds like being concerned with harmony, civility, empathy, compassion, love etc.Ok, now what is wrong with God putting into place certain laws and penalties for breaking those laws in a nation of people who He desires to be the paradigm of civil, righteous, and just harmonious living?
Do you have a specific passage in mind?
Well, stoning people to death doesn´t sound like promoting the paradigms of harmonious living to me. To me it sounds like being concerned with the law being kept, more than it sounds like being concerned with harmony, civility, empathy, compassion, love etc.
Anyway, in case you are planning to pull the "God is sovereign and can do whatever He wants" card or your favourite "God determines what´s good and what´s bad - so who are you to..." script at any point your other arguments might fail, please do it right now. It could spare us all a lot of redundant discussion which at this point you are pretending to be willing to have.
1 Samuel 15:2-3 refers to God directly ordering the complete and total destruction of the amalekites, and killing everything in their civilization, including innocent livestock.
Numbers 31:1-18 says God ordered the killing of all the Midianites, except the virgin women who the soldiers were allowed to "keep for themselves".
And stoning others to death would be among the first things that this law would have to prohibit - in order for this society to even only come close to something that deserves the term "civility" and "harmony".There can be no civility and harmony within a society without law.
Applying your own paradigms: Nothing, of course. The picture painted there looks like an utopia of perfect harmony and civility.Ok, lets assume your paraphrases are accurate.
What is wrong with those commands?
There can be no civility and harmony within a society without law.
Ok, lets assume your paraphrases are accurate.
What is wrong with those commands?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?