Dave Ellis
Contributor
- Dec 27, 2011
- 8,933
- 821
- Gender
- Male
- Faith
- Atheist
- Marital Status
- In Relationship
- Politics
- CA-Conservatives
Perhaps the Australian PM, though an atheist, sees religion as necessary for the majority of people because she is a cynic and an elitist - i.e., she really thinks they would not be "good" if they didn't worry about an invisible all-seeing eye all around. Or maybe she thinks political control of people in general is necessary and that religion will tend to produce sheep-like attitudes, as opposed to atheism (in the sense that herding atheists is like herding cats. LOL.)
It's called pragmatism.
I suspect Obama is in reality some sort of agnostic/atheist/deist and is just playing the game one must play if one is to be the POTUS - and be reelected POTUS.
IOW, the idea some atheists hold - that to be a TRUE atheist one must be scrupulously honest and "pure" 100 per cent of the time, come hell or high-water - is utopian clap-trap. (I blame Ayn Rand and Karl Marx - among others - for such, uh, baloney.)
Seeing as there's a significant percentage of Atheists in Australia, and religion generally plays no part in their politics I can't see that being her reasoning. It would be fairly obvious in that kind of culture that religious belief is not required to be good.
Upvote
0