Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Forums
New posts
Forum list
Search forums
Leaderboards
Games
Our Blog
Blogs
New entries
New comments
Blog list
Search blogs
Credits
Transactions
Shop
Blessings: ✟0.00
Tickets
Open new ticket
Watched
Donate
Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
More options
Toggle width
Share this page
Share this page
Share
Reddit
Pinterest
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Email
Share
Link
Menu
Install the app
Install
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
Physical & Life Sciences
The God particle is a fabrication.
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Phred" data-source="post: 58935000" data-attributes="member: 10891"><p>When we observe stars in the universe we see that some stars at the edges of galaxies move too fast. Yet they are held in orbit around the center of these galaxies. So we infer that there must be more mass in the galaxies than we can see. The stars act as if they are following normal gravitational rules. So we don't infer that they are being held in place by God. That would be stupid. There's no evidence to suggest that a god or gods exist. There's no evidence to suggest that if they did exist in their spare time they imitate gravitational pull. So why in the world would we assume such a thing? Oh, right... because you're so desperate to have someone, anyone validate your belief.</p><p></p><p></p><p>You mean like finding a fossil on a mountain top and assuming it's because of a tremendous flood and not the upheaval of tectonic plates over millions of years? It's not the evidence that supports a false idea. The evidence is what it is. It's the person that interprets the evidence. </p><p></p><p> </p><p>That's why we work to find more and more evidence to support our hypothesis. Right now dark matter is a hypothesis. We know there's more matter out there than we can account for. We don't know where it is or what form it takes. Science right now claims dark matter MAY exist. When we can prove it we'll let you know.</p><p></p><p></p><p>It seems as if the person interpreting the data (you) is screwed up. And that's why the evidence is being misinterpreted. The fact is that there's more gravity out there than we can account for. Now we're trying to account for it. Dark matter is one way we're hypothesizing it may be. Another is that gravity is a force that comes into this universe from another. Which is why it's so strong over such long distances yet so weak compared to other forces. That's the short version. </p><p></p><p>You done trying to discredit science for today?</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Phred, post: 58935000, member: 10891"] When we observe stars in the universe we see that some stars at the edges of galaxies move too fast. Yet they are held in orbit around the center of these galaxies. So we infer that there must be more mass in the galaxies than we can see. The stars act as if they are following normal gravitational rules. So we don't infer that they are being held in place by God. That would be stupid. There's no evidence to suggest that a god or gods exist. There's no evidence to suggest that if they did exist in their spare time they imitate gravitational pull. So why in the world would we assume such a thing? Oh, right... because you're so desperate to have someone, anyone validate your belief. You mean like finding a fossil on a mountain top and assuming it's because of a tremendous flood and not the upheaval of tectonic plates over millions of years? It's not the evidence that supports a false idea. The evidence is what it is. It's the person that interprets the evidence. That's why we work to find more and more evidence to support our hypothesis. Right now dark matter is a hypothesis. We know there's more matter out there than we can account for. We don't know where it is or what form it takes. Science right now claims dark matter MAY exist. When we can prove it we'll let you know. It seems as if the person interpreting the data (you) is screwed up. And that's why the evidence is being misinterpreted. The fact is that there's more gravity out there than we can account for. Now we're trying to account for it. Dark matter is one way we're hypothesizing it may be. Another is that gravity is a force that comes into this universe from another. Which is why it's so strong over such long distances yet so weak compared to other forces. That's the short version. You done trying to discredit science for today? [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
Physical & Life Sciences
The God particle is a fabrication.
Top
Bottom