The Globe

[Hentenza]

Sun cults influenced cosmology, and later, heliocentrism challenged religiously held geocentric views.

And the “flat earth/ everything I the Bible is literary true” cult ignores cosmology and challenges religiosity as well since the Bible teaches neither.

 

[Apple Sky]

And he’s influencing you with his paganism because you continue to watch his videos.

And why you continue to watch the so called Paganistic planets & quoting the Helios sun Apollo.

So stop accusing others of paganism when you’re the one quoting it.

Pot kettle

 

[Phil G]

And why you continue to watch the so called Paganistic planets & quoting the Helios sun Apollo.

I don’t. I watch Christian eye witnesses. I do my own checks about the shape of the earth. I study the Bible in context, which you don’t.

It has nothing to do with anything pagan.

You on the other hand post videos from a proven pagan. You read myths and legends and new ageism. Stop being so hypocritical.

 

[Phil G]

Pot kettle

I don’t post pagan videos. You do.

 

[Apple Sky]

The heliocentric model is been known since the 3rd century BCE.

But never more so since Copernicus.

 

[Phil G]

But never more so since Copernicus.

Rubbish. Globe earth was an accepted fact for centuries before Copernicus.

 

[Apple Sky]

It has nothing to do with anything pagan.

No - Think on.

 

[Phil G]

No - Think on.

No you think on. I’ve just told you what I do, and it isn’t pagan.

You post Dubay videos, which proves beyond doubt you imbibe paganism.

All one has to do is go back through your posts on various threads and it will be obvious that you mix paganism, myths, legends and new ageism into your beliefs.

 

[Apple Sky]

Rubbish. Globe earth was an accepted fact for centuries before Copernicus.

About 500 years ago is when Heliocentricism came too fruition.

 

[RDKirk]

About 500 years ago is when Heliocentricism came too fruition.

And the geocentric theory had also used a globular earth since 300BC.

 

[Phil G]

About 500 years ago is when Heliocentricism came too fruition.

No heliocentricism came to fruition centuries before.

 

[Apple Sky]

No you think on. I’ve just told you what I do, and it isn’t pagan.

Then what is when one keeps on about the none existent planets and the Helios sun Apollo.

 

[Apple Sky]

No heliocentricism came to fruition centuries before.

Before what ?

 

[Hentenza]

But never more so since Copernicus.

The heliocentric model is a fact Apple Sky. There is no geocentric model.

 

[Phil G]

Then what is when one keeps on about the none existent planets and the Helios sun Apollo.

I don’t keep on about that no more than I keep on about Thor or Woden when I mention Wednesday or Thursday.

You on the other hand delve deep into paganism with your myths, legends, new ageism.

 

[Phil G]

Before what ?

Before 500 years ago. Why can you not understand context? My answer was in the context of your post before it!

 

[Apple Sky]

I don’t keep on about that no more than I keep on about Thor or Widen when I mention Wednesday or Thursday.

You know that these planets & the sun are named after pagan gods so why do you quote them ?

 

[Phil G]

You know that these planets & the sun are named after pagan gods so why do you quote them ?

I don’t quote them. There’s a difference between using a given name and quoting somebody. The days of the week are also named after pagan gods. Are you quoting them when you say you did something on Tuesday or Saturday?

The difference is you actually read myths, legends and new ageism and mix it all in with your belief system.

When I use the given names of planets and such, I’m not mixing paganism into my beliefs. They are just given names.

I think you’re just trolling me now as the difference is obvious.

 

[Apple Sky]

I don’t quote them.

Yes you do, why do you quote planets that are really stars ? They are, as stated in Scripture, Wandering stars.

 

[Phil G]

Yes you do, why do you quote planets that are really stars ? They are, as stated in Scripture, Wandering stars.

You don’t know the meaning of quote. A quote is when you repeat something that somebody said.

Mentioning a name is not a quote. Saying you did something on Thursday is not quoting Thor. Nor is saying you saw Jupiter in the sky quoting Jupiter.

You however have posted various posts actually quoting pagans. That’s a big difference. You’ve also posted videos of pagan anti-Christ Dubay on numerous occasions, despite agreeing that he mocks God.

Either you are incredibly uneducated or you’re deliberately trolling me not to know the difference between what you do (actually quoting pagans and posting their videos) and what I do (using a given name, which is not quoting).