The Fossil Record- As God Would Have Made It Through Time

[Warden_of_the_Storm]

of course not, because its falsify your claim.

Can't happen, especially with your 'example'.

 

[xianghua]

Are you claiming that the one on the left gave birth to the one in the middle?

no. i just showed that puting things in hierarchy doesnt prove they evolved from each other.

 

[majj27]

no. i just showed that puting things in hierarchy doesnt prove they evolved from each other.

No, you didn't. You proved that you can post a picture of non-living objects ordered small to large. That's the extent of what you've demonstrated.

 

[xianghua]

No, you didn't. You proved that you can post a picture of non-living objects ordered small to large.

true. so order by itself prove nothing. right?

 

[majj27]

true. so order by itself prove nothing. right?

*sigh* I can't tell if you're confused or just intentionally being obtuse. I mean, I really can't tell.

I mean, it makes about as much sense as going into a discussion on whether or not Van Gogh was more post-impressionist or expressionist, dropping down this image:

And then declaring that Van Gogh was, in fact, an apple tree.

 

[tas8831]

no. i just showed that puting things in hierarchy doesnt prove they evolved from each other.

But you see, in biology, we do NOT 'just put things' in a hierarchy.

Analysis of the DATA puts them there.

I am feeling like a broken record - here is a series of citations/abstracts that outline the rationale - in a post in this very thread, just below the post you replied to.

 

[tas8831]

The best way to put God back in the schools is to teach the kids that they aren't the "little angels" that they, their parents and teachers constantly lead them to believe they are. Place the moral onus on them to behave like decent human beings, sit down, shut up, and engage with the teacher to learn what is being taught. Also point out that many of them will fail, die young, go to jail, go nuts, fall into poverty, get or get someone pregnant out of wedlock, etc, etc, etc, just as every 'class' before them has done. And that they will likely become victims of the 'world' because of their own greed and stupidity long before any of them bring meaningful change to it.

That would be a good start.

I agree with the 'process', but disagree that it really has anything to do with God.

Most of the worst-behaved kids I know are proud and vocal Christians.

 

[OldWiseGuy]

Most of the worst-behaved kids I know are proud and vocal Christians.

Who think they are sinless and pure as the wind driven snow. Only God tells us the truth about our rotten character. That's why when we tell our kids they aren't little angels we are putting the truth of God into their minds (no need to even mention God however).

 

[Warden_of_the_Storm]

true. so order by itself prove nothing. right?

But those photos aren't showing an order of small fossils to larger fossils. If you can't see the fact that those photos show the transition from basal forms of whales to modern forms, then there's no helping you.

 

[FrumiousBandersnatch]

of course not, because its falsify your claim.

No, because it's stupid.

 

[Jimmy D]

like this one?;

(image from Focum Desenvolvimento | São Paulo)

(Only just spotted this as I've got xianghua on ignore.)

No xianghua, nothing like that.

Seriously, what is wrong with you?

You are responding to my post that shows a smooth, gradual transition of fossils. Are you suggesting that your image shows the same thing? Do you think that the truck is the ancestor of the small van?!?! That it evolved from the small van via a process analogous to biological evolution? That is one of the stupidest things I have read on these forums and a timely reminder of why you're on ignore.

Goodbye.

 

[Heissonear]

(Only just spotted this as I've got xianghua on ignore.)

No xianghua, nothing like that.

Seriously, what is wrong with you?

You are responding to my post that shows a smooth, gradual transition of fossils. Are you suggesting that your image shows the same thing? Do you think that the truck is the ancestor of the small van?!?! That it evolved from the small van via a process analogous to biological evolution? That is one of the stupidest things I have read on these forums and a timely reminder of why you're on ignore.

Goodbye.

In the OP, there is reference to zero fossil sequences of one lifeform morpholigically changing step by step into another lifeform.

Zero means zero.

The fossil record does not show evolution ever happened. The very physical evidence to prove evolution scientifically does not exist.

The fossil record then proves there is not a biological process of natural factors and conditions that show one lesser lifeform changes through such referred natural and biological processes into a new lifeform morphologically distinct and adapted to its natural surroundings.

Zero natural process exist for evolution.

The position of evolutionists is now like stating nature evolves mopeds into Harley's, VW's into Porsche's, lawnmowere into farm tractors, pickup trucks into semi's. The list goes on. There are no natural processes nor pathways of "equipment evolving".

The same is true with lifeforms past and present - no natural processes nor pathways of "complex lifeforms evolving."

Now tell us again how a Chevy evolves into a Mercedes. You know, a process where over time into a more complex higher equipment-form.

 

[Speedwell]

Now tell us again how a Chevy evolves into a Mercedes.

Certainly. As soon as you show me a self-replicating Chevy which reproduces with heritable variation.

 

[Heissonear]

The Tree of Life has zero fossil record evidence inbetween all speculative from this to that lifeform hierarchy.

Evolution and its cartoon images have no physical proof in fossil record. This is a fact evolutionists are not wanting to acknowledge nor accept.

 

[majj27]

Certainly. As soon as you show me a self-replicating Chevy which reproduces with heritable variation.

Well, you see Speedwell, when a Mommy Car and a Daddy Car love each other very much...

 

[Warden_of_the_Storm]

In the OP, there is reference to zero fossil sequences of one lifeform morpholigically changing step by step into another lifeform.

Zero means zero.

The fossil record does not show evolution ever happened. The very physical evidence to prove evolution scientifically does not exist.

The fossil record then proves there is not a biological process of natural factors and conditions that show one lesser lifeform changes through such referred natural and biological processes into a new lifeform morphologically distinct and adapted to its natural surroundings.

Zero natural process exist for evolution.

The position of evolutionists is now like stating nature evolves mopeds into Harley's, VW's into Porsche's, lawnmowere into farm tractors, pickup trucks into semi's. The list goes on. There are no natural processes nor pathways of "equipment evolving".

The same is true with lifeforms past and present - no natural processes nor pathways of "complex lifeforms evolving."

Now tell us again how a Chevy evolves into a Mercedes. You know, a process where over time into a more complex higher equipment-form.

Why are you lying?

 

[Warden_of_the_Storm]

The Tree of Life has zero fossil record evidence inbetween all speculative from this to that lifeform hierarchy.

Evolution and its cartoon images have no physical proof in fossil record. This is a fact evolutionists are not wanting to acknowledge nor accept.

Why are you lying?

 

[theQuincunx5]

In the OP, there is reference to zero fossil sequences of one lifeform morpholigically changing step by step into another lifeform.

Zero means zero.

But I think we can all agree there are transitional forms that show common features between one lifeform and another. Take Tikktallik for instance.

Indeed we do see life change in the largest aspects over time. We never find rabbit fossils in Cambrian strata, we don't find any mammals there. We never find human bones in with dinosaurs. We do however find that birds appear to have come out of dinosaurs and share many features common.

The fossil record then proves there is not a biological process of natural factors and conditions that show one lesser lifeform changes through such referred natural and biological processes

So are you saying that maladaptive traits that would keep something from reproducing carry forward in life forms? How does that work?

Zero natural process exist for evolution.

That's surprising because the processes are basically a reproducing life form in an environment that can kill things. It would seem extremely simple to suggest how that could result in evolution.

Now tell us again how a Chevy evolves into a Mercedes.

Where are all these self-reproducing cars and trucks? I thought they came from a factory. Is there a farm somewhere?

 

[Heissonear]

The fossil record proves how God Created Kinds, with no evolution. Zero lifeforms evolving morphologically into another lifeform over time in the fossil record. Just as God would have made the fossil record, per Genesis One. 100% evidence supporting Genesis One Kinds with no evolution in sight or needed.

 

[Heissonear]

But I think we can all agree there are transitional forms that show common features between one lifeform and another. Take Tikktallik for instance.

Indeed we do see life change in the largest aspects over time. We never find rabbit fossils in Cambrian strata, we don't find any mammals there. We never find human bones in with dinosaurs. We do however find that birds appear to have come out of dinosaurs and share many features common.



So are you saying that maladaptive traits that would keep something from reproducing carry forward in life forms? How does that work?



That's surprising because the processes are basically a reproducing life form in an environment that can kill things. It would seem extremely simple to suggest how that could result in evolution.



Where are all these self-reproducing cars and trucks? I thought they came from a factory. Is there a farm somewhere?

Are you unwilling to face the glaring fact that out of billions of fossils there are no sequence of fossils unearthed showing morphological changes of one lifeform changing into another lifeform over time?

Are you unwilling to face this face?