The burden of proof is upon you. Prove that God didn't mean exactly what He said.
Exodus 31:17 (KJV)
17 for in six days the Lord made heaven and earth,
Upvote
0
Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
The burden of proof is upon you. Prove that God didn't mean exactly what He said.That's YECism for you. Stick your fingers in your ears and just proof text ad nauseum until everyone else gives up on you.
You seem to be confusing inspiration with literary style. Are you saying God's word cannot contain any literary styles we find in secular literature, history, genealogy, poetry?It's still God's Word, not fables.
THE PILLARS OF THE EARTHThe burden of proof is upon you. Prove that God didn't mean exactly what He said.
One is God's Word, the other isn't.You seem to be confusing inspiration with literary style. Are you saying God's word cannot contain any literary styles we find in secular literature, history, genealogy, poetry?
Other than the fact one is inspired by God, how is the literary style of Aesop's fable The Fox and The Grapes different from the story of the talking trees in Judges 9:8-15?
Who said I don't believe it? Not I.The bible clearly says that the earth sits on pillars. If you don't believe it then you obviously have unbelief in God. Prove that God didn't mean exactly what He said. The burden of proof is now on you.
You are still confusing inspiration with literary style. Want to try again?One is God's Word, the other isn't.You seem to be confusing inspiration with literary style. Are you saying God's word cannot contain any literary styles we find in secular literature, history, genealogy, poetry?
Other than the fact one is inspired by God, how is the literary style of Aesop's fable The Fox and The Grapes different from the story of the talking trees in Judges 9:8-15?
Utter utter nonsense. It's hard to know where to begin with such unadulterated cobblers, it's so wrong I'm thinking of writing to Oxford English Press to get each of the specific words you used removed from their dictionary so that such a heinous sentence can't ever be constructed again.
Evolutionary biology, in fact any branch of science, has absolutely zero effect on the end-times no matter what your eschatology, the two things have no bearing on each other and to say Christ's second coming is anti-evolution is just teh kind of ad hoc non-sequitur we'd expect from you. And the idea that the end-times concet exists specifically as some kind of bullwark against evolution, or any branch of science, is a fundamental misunderstanding of what God 's special revelation through scripture. I'm fed up of people appropriating the Bible to preach against their pet-hates.
The burden of proof is upon you. Prove that God didn't mean exactly what He said.
The world education is becoming very secular at a very fast pace. Is this what should happen near the end time? Ask yourself why don't biology department teach TE, instead of just teach E? Without the "very important" "constant support" of God, they seems doing fine with the same version of evolution as you know it.
Ah so you are a troll, thanks for clarifying that.Who said I don't believe it? Not I.
I suppose I could point you to all the overwhelming scientific evidence from God's own creation that contradicts a 6-day creation, but I don't expect you would acknowledge it because it contradicts your interpretation of Scripture.The burden of proof is upon you. Prove that God didn't mean exactly what He said.
Exodus 31:17 (KJV)
17 for in six days the Lord made heaven and earth,
Irrelevant. God's Word is God's Word, not fables.You are still confusing inspiration with literary style. Want to try again?
Is that your best defense?Ah so you are a troll, thanks for clarifying that.
Answer this: If science contradicts God's Word which do you believe? If the 6 day creation is literal how would God have said it? Exactly like He did.I suppose I could point you to all the overwhelming scientific evidence from God's own creation that contradicts a 6-day creation, but I don't expect you would acknowledge it because it contradicts your interpretation of Scripture.
Anyways, it's clear you're not interested in expounding on your hermeneutical approach -- opting instead to just repeat out-of-context Bible quotes -- so I'll leave it at that.
I told you, people like you want to appropriate and subvert the bible for your own ends. Instead of letting God's word lead you, you want to shoehorn in you own agendas.You seems to be upset by this simple connection of ideas. I do not know why.
The world education is becoming very secular at a very fast pace. Is this what should happen near the end time? Ask yourself why don't biology department teach TE, instead of just teach E? Without the "very important" "constant support" of God, they seems doing fine with the same version of evolution as you know it.
Bilbo! I can see the river of the Nile below! by thunder, they're taking us to the edge of ..... Sinai forest!
YouTube - The Hobbit (1977) Part 5
More promotion. Its a shame then, that empirical evidence is excommunicated in the name of another field of science. Oh, look at an astronomer with a telescope, no mention of molecules. Your innards are now composed of Saturn and its rings. You can also "see" the photosphere of the star regulating temperature because I spend my life putting astronomy over molecular biology just so it would have paid off in an instance like this. An instance when a propellant would be needed to circumvent the gates of testing and observation.And those evil atheistic calculus departments! No mention of God.
The are theories connecting the Great Flood with Atlantis which I find to be the most likely. An event of such proportions as recorded would have taken place within a locality, or two seperate expanses. This in itself would render it beyond a national title and would constitute the title of a Global event. Another fact is that the catastrophic effects of that event would have been felt to a lesser degree around the world, which would also render it as a global flood (with the flood title capturing both the major element involved in the cataclysm felt at the local levels, and the effects felt around the globe).Noah's Flood was a large local flood. As for plants, plants seem to return to areas previously flooded. In Missouri, we had what is termed a "thousand year flood" in 1993. The area has recovered quite well since then.
Completely protected though. So this is what these flood threads are built for. Another haven for the debasing of biblical authors. Instead of rising to the occasion and providing evidence for random mutational origin, the pull down everything around them. Complaining that creationists use the bible with no scientific evidence, a complacent reader will not realize that creationist in this context is actually referring to Darwinists. Somehow altering biblical texts to mean Darwinism, will lead Christians to Darwin since they follow the bible.The Bible is God's holy Word of Truth. Comparing it to fables is near blasphemous.
And if God meant the earth literally does not move, how would He have said it? Exactly like He did:Answer this: If science contradicts God's Word which do you believe? If the 6 day creation is literal how would God have said it? Exactly like He did.
Exodus 31:17 (KJV)
17 for in six days the Lord made heaven and earth, ...
Again simply say it is irrelevant doesn't make it so. Does being God's word mean scripture cannot have literary styles? Do you also claimIrrelevant. God's Word is God's Word, not fables.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?