- Apr 9, 2006
- 75
- 4
- Faith
- Seeker
- Marital Status
- Single
- Politics
- US-Democrat
Is it at all possable that the Flood described in Gen. was just a "myth" used to portray an image about God, who will reward the righteous, but punish the wicked?
Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
Absolutely. It's a Wonderful forum to see myths decimated with facts. I don't know how anyone can come away from that forum without learning why things such as the Great Flood could not have possible ever happened.Abbadon said:Wait, visit the Creation and Evolution forum on THIS site?
For accurate info?
Hi people, and thank you for replying. Yes, what you have said is what I am leaning with, and have been. I was trying to get some fundies in here to see what they would say. I feel that a lot of Christians would feel that their religion would be violated if this story turned out to be symbolic. It shouldn't, but you know how some people are.Soul_Searcher said:Hi Lightencandle,
"Is it at all possible that the Flood described in Gen. was just a "myth" used to portray an image about God, who will reward the righteous, but punish the wicked?"
Not only possible, but probable. The physical parameters of Noah's instructions were impossible. There is no evidence for a global flood in the geological record, nor is there any way for that much water to fall and then disappear. Flood stories abound in ancient traditions and mythology, and it only makes sense that people who saw lightning and thought it was from God (however they defined God) would think a flood was a punishment from God also.
I agree with you here, but I can see why people can and will feel that their faith in God is somehow violated if this story were symbolic. Kinda similar to the story of Jonah or the countless other episodes in the Bible (especially the OT) that describe bizarre events. Some people really do sincerely want to base their faith on God based upon what they consider literal events in the Bible. There may be a part of burying ones head in the sand taking place, but if it's important to their walk with God, more power to them[lightencandle] I feel that a lot of Christians would feel that their religion would be violated if this story turned out to be symbolic. It shouldn't, but you know how some people are.
Chrysalis Kat said:Absolutely. It's a Wonderful forum to see myths decimated with facts. I don't know how anyone can come away from that forum without learning why things such as the Great Flood could not have possible ever happened.
TScott said:The flood story in the Bible is a re-write of a similar story found in the Babylonian epic, The Gilgamesh. The Gilgamesh was written between 500 and a thousand years before the Noah story, but the similarities in the two are striking.
There were probably many floods in the region.
I've never seen that.KCDAD said:... and see other facts decimating those facts...![]()
http://www.religioustolerance.org/noah_com.htmKCDAD said:If you read Gilgamesh, you will see there are very few similiarities between the two tales... water, a boat, animals... that, they have in common. The Enuma Elish is another interesting tale from pre-Hebrew times. They are both rather short... and weird.
Is it at all possable that the Flood described in Gen. was just a "myth" used to portray an image about God, who will reward the righteous, but punish the wicked?