• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

The Fall of Adam and Eve

orthedoxy

Lusavorchagan
Dec 15, 2003
533
17
pasadena california
✟764.00
Faith
Oriental Orthodox
God is in control. That doesn't mean he control us like a puppet master control the puppet. God punishes the wicked he rewards believers. Jesus is coming at the end to judge everyone. God also uses the believers to do his work and greater is he in us then he who is in the world. Now how can I say he is not sovereign?
I’m not saying we are made of the same material as a puppet. From Calvinist view God controls people like a puppet master control his puppet. You guys believe he causes murder and rape, He ordains people to molest babies. How is this not like controlling puppets?
How can a man be free to go through walls when he was not ordained to do so? How can Adam be free to eat the apple when he was created to eat the fruit?
 
Upvote 0

wnwall

Active Member
Aug 18, 2007
110
24
✟22,906.00
Faith
Calvinist
Marital Status
Single
How can Adam be free to eat the apple when he was created to eat the fruit?

What makes you assume Adam was "free"? Whatever it is that you mean when you say "free", it is obviously not compatible with Adam being ordained to eat the fruit, but then how can you assume Adam had this type of freedom?

Calvinists believe the Bible means what it says. What do you think the Bible means when it says that before the foundation of the world God had planned to slay his Son? It does say that, and I've already quoted the verse.

All who dwell on earth will worship it, everyone whose name has not been written before the foundation of the world in the book of life of the Lamb who was slain (Revelation 13:8).
Don't just ignore what's obvious in the verse just because there are some hard things about it to understand (such as what the beast is in Revelation). We can draw some conclusions from this verse without even understanding the difficult things. For instance, we know God has a book with names in it. It doesn't matter if it's a physical book, which I grant to you it probably isn't, or if the "book" is metaphorical. What matters is this verse says God has a list of names and if your name is in this list you will not worship the beast, whatever the beast is is irrelevant. And the Lamb was slain for the names of the people on this list. When was the book written? This verse says, "before the foundation of the world." So before creation, God already knew that he would slay his Son. God could have not created the world. Or he could have created it a different way; in such a way that his Son would not have to be slain. But he did it this way, knowing already that his Son would be slain, and he did it that way because he wanted to. He planned it. It doesn't matter how you conceive on the immediate causality. If you know how something is going to turn out because of what you do and you know that later you'll do something else, and you want to do that, so you do it, we call that a plan. God created a world where sin would exist and his Son would be slain because he wanted to.

There are plenty of other examples in the Bible where we are told God planned specific sins. Would you deny that the murder of Jesus at the hand of the Romans and Jews was a horrendous evil? Would you deny that the Romans and Jews who murdered Jesus were acting sinfully? But the Bible says they killed him "according to the definite plan and foreknowledge of God" (Acts 2:23). And two chapters later it says it again,

Truly in this city there were gathered together against your holy servant Jesus, whom you anointed, both Herod and Pontius Pilate, along with the Gentiles and the peoples of Israel, to do whatever your hand and your plan had predestined to take place (Acts 4:27-28).
God planned Jesus' death. It can't get any clearer than that. Yet the Jews and Romans who participated are still responsible for their sins.

Another great example is Joseph's being sold into slavery by his brothers. Joseph said to them, "You meant evil against me, but God meant it for good" (Genesis 50:20). There was no doubt in Joseph's mind that behind his brother's wicked plans was God's good plan.

Or Job, who after all ten of his children were killed by Satan, fell to the ground and said, "The LORD gave, and the LORD has taken away; blessed be the name of the LORD" (Job 1:21). Do you think Job was wrong in attributing what Satan did to God's ultimate plan? The writer of the book didn't, for the very next verse says, "In all this Job did not sin or charge God with wrong."

Or Peter, who had a very similar story to Job. Satan came to God and said, "Let me sift Peter like wheat," and God said, "Alright." But look what Jesus said to Peter, "But I have prayed for you that your faith may not fail. And when you have turned again, strengthen your brothers" (Luke 22:32). That's absolute sovereignty talking. Jesus did not say, "if you turn," Jesus said, "I have seen to it that your faith may not fail utterly, when you have turned strengthen your brothers." And when Peter objected and said, "I would never deny you; I would die for you." Jesus did not say, "Well you do have free will, so if you try hard enough you can overcome what my Father has planned." Jesus said, "I tell you, Peter, the rooster will not crow this day, until you deny three times that you know me" (Luke 22:34).

Or Naomi, who after her husband and two sons died said, "The Almighty has dealt very bitterly with me. I went away full, and the LORD has brought me back empty" (Ruth 1:21). There was no question in her mind that her husband and sons were dead because God had planned it.

Or Pharaoh, who refused to let the Israelites go; why? Exodus 4:21 says, "the LORD said to Moses, 'When you go back to Egypt, see that you do before Pharaoh all the miracles that I have put in your power. But I will harden his heart, so that he will not let the people go.'"

Proverbs 21:1 says, "The king’s heart is a stream of water in the hand of the LORD; he turns it wherever he will". And that applies to good kings and bad kings.

Mark 1:27 says, "He commands even the unclean spirits, and they obey him." When Jesus says, "Satan you can inflict Job will all kinds of sores and painful ailments, but do not lay a hand on his life," Satan does not frustrate Jesus' plans with his free will and kill Job. Satan obeys.

Daniel 4:35, "He does according to his will among the host of heaven and among the inhabitants of the earth; and none can stay his hand or say to him, 'What have you done?'"

Isaiah 45:7, "I form light and create darkness, I make well-being and create calamity, I am the LORD, who does all these things."

Amos 3:6, "Does disaster come to a city, unless the LORD has done it?"

Matthew 10:29, "Are not two sparrows sold for a penny? And not one of them will fall to the ground apart from your Father." Even birds that aren't worth more than a penny, not a single one dies unless God wills it.

Proverbs 16:33, "The lot is cast into the lap, but its every decision is from the LORD." Or to put it in modern-day terms, "There is not one dice roll in Reno that isn't governed by God" (John Piper, I think; maybe Sproul?). That's what Proverbs 16:33 says. God plans every win and every loss in Vegas.

There are so many verses that teach that God is absolutely in control of all things, whether it be weather or death or sickness or famine or poverty or riches or wickedness or righteousness, God plans it. These verses aren't lies. They're there because it's true.

Do you know what sovereignty is? Sovereignty is Isaiah 14:27, "For the LORD of hosts has purposed, and who will annul it? His hand is stretched out, and who will turn it back?" God is in control. No one frustrates his plans. God did not create us hoping we wouldn't sin and then get his plans of a perfect world frustrated by men with free wills.

God planned that we would fall so that his Son could die for us and get the glory that only a Redeemer can. "God shows his love for us in that while we were still sinners, Christ died for us" (Romans 5:8).

One thing people struggle with as they're learning about Calvinism is this assumption that if God planned our sin, we're not responsible for it. But that's not what the Bible teaches. The Bible teaches that somehow, and it is a mystery, I do not understand it fully, but somehow God has done things in such a way that we are still responsible for our sins even though he planned them to serve his good purposes.

I saw another poster here (I think it was GrinningDwarf) pose this question to someone else, and I'll pose it here for you. If this is true, that God has planned even our sins, why does he still find fault? For who can resist his will? How would you answer that question?

Don't lose this question in the rest of my post because the apostle Paul was asked the very same thing, and I'd really like you to try to answer it before reading how Paul answered it. Don't look it up. Try to answer it to the best of your ability. Answer it as if someone who was struggling with Calvinism had come up to you and asked you, "Why does God still find fault? For who can resist his will?" What would you say to them? Then compare your answer to Paul's answer and see how they line up. I'll tell you where Paul answered it after you think about it some.

I know this is hard, but please give it some good honest thought. The biblical evidence for God's sovereignty in all things is overwhelming. Calvinism isn't just a philosophical discussion on whether God could create men with free will. Calvinism is what the Bible teaches, and that's the only reason I ever accepted Calvinism. But I can promise you, it has not been a gloomy acceptance. It has been a joyful acceptance, and I am glad to serve a God whose purposes cannot be frustrated, who ordains that all things should come to pass, who upholds the very foundations of life with his very thought. The God of the Bible; the sovereign Lord over all creation, is a glorious God worthy of all praise and adoration.

May he open your heart to his eternal truths,
Nathan

(Much of this post is nearly a direct quote from Piper's sermon "Where Is God? (UCF)". I highly recommend listening to it.)
 
Upvote 0

orthedoxy

Lusavorchagan
Dec 15, 2003
533
17
pasadena california
✟764.00
Faith
Oriental Orthodox
Our names were written in the book of life before the foundation of the world because God saves according to his foreknowledge. God is the one doing the saving and he is the beginning and the end.
Rom 8: 29For those God foreknew he also predestined to be conformed to the likeness of his Son, that he might be the firstborn among many brothers.
1 Pet 1:2who have been chosen according to the foreknowledge of God the Father, through the sanctifying work of the Spirit, for obedience to Jesus Christ and sprinkling by his blood:
God saves after you believe not before.
Act 2:38 Peter replied, "Repent and be baptized, every one of you, in the name of Jesus Christ for the forgiveness of your sins. And you will receive the gift of the Holy Spirit.

Rom 10:9That if you confess with your mouth, "Jesus is Lord," and believe in your heart that God raised him from the dead, you will be saved. This verse doesn’t say you may know you are one of the elect. This verse says you will be saved.
I can show you hundreds of verses that say the same thing salvation comes after believe. How can you have read the bible and missed this simple teaching?
How can we have been saved before the creation when we have not believed yet?

You have proved to me that your God is a child molester and a liar and commits murder by quoting all these verses. Why don’t you give God the glory when a person lies? Why don’t you just come out and say God lied? Why give him the glory only in the good things like salvation? Why do you guys say God saves when its men that preaches the gospel?
I will answer your question. God does not plan our sins. Nobody can resist Gods will in this way if God wants his people to enter the Promised Land they will enter. This does not mean he could irresistibly program people to accomplish his will. Look at Jonah for example if God could programmed him to go to Nineveh he would have programmed him and he would have said I want to go to Nineveh. God made Jonah go to Nineveh by having a fish swallow him instead. Why didn’t God change his heart?
The same thing with the flood why did he cause the flood when he could have changed everyone heart to repent?
Act 7: 51"You stiff-necked people, with uncircumcised hearts and ears! You are just like your fathers: You always resist the Holy Spirit!” Did these people resist God?
Matt 23: 37"O Jerusalem, Jerusalem, you who kill the prophets and stone those sent to you, how often I have longed to gather your children together, as a hen gathers her chicks under her wings, but you were not willing.” Jesus(God) wanted to do something why couldn’t he do it?
Matthew 18:6
But if anyone causes one of these little ones who believe in me to sin, it would be better for him to have a large millstone hung around his neck and to be drowned in the depths of the sea. Is it God’s will that the little ones to be harmed?
How do you explain in these places were God will could be resisted?
I still don’t understand from your view, why did God wanted to kill his son before he created people?
 
Upvote 0

wnwall

Active Member
Aug 18, 2007
110
24
✟22,906.00
Faith
Calvinist
Marital Status
Single
I can show you hundreds of verses that say the same thing salvation comes after believe. How can you have read the bible and missed this simple teaching?
How can we have been saved before the creation when we have not believed yet?
I do not believe we were saved before the foundation of the world. That's not the conclusion I drew from that verse. The conclusion I drew was that before creation, God had already planned to send his Son to die. We hadn't yet believed, but God had already made plans to save us. Which means that before creation, God already knew we would sin, and I also believe God had plenty of other options in creation, this isn't the only world he could have created. But this is the one he did create, which tells us this is the one he wanted to create. Knowing that we would sin and he would send his Son to die for our sins, God created the world. He didn't have to do it that way, but he did. In all similar cases, we call that line of reasoning a plan. God planned our sin along with the death of his Son in creation. He didn't force us to sin, but he knew we would sin, he could have stopped us from sinning, he could have created the world a different way, but he made this world in which we would sin so that he could send his Son. That's a plan.

You have proved to me that your God is a child molester and a liar and commits murder by quoting all these verses.

The quotes came from the Bible. I do not know if you believe the Bible is inerrant and inspired by God, but I didn't write those verses. They were there long before me.

Why don’t you give God the glory when a person lies?

God is glorified when a person lies, in one of two ways. He is glorified in the grace he shows that person in the death of his Son, or he is glorified by banishing that person from his presence and condemning them, justly and righteously, to everlasting hell.

What if some were unfaithful? Does their faithlessness nullify the faithfulness of God? By no means! Let God be true though every one were a liar, as it is written,

"That you may be justified in your words,
and prevail when you are judged."

But if our unrighteousness serves to show the righteousness of God, what shall we say? That God is unrighteous to inflict wrath on us? (I speak in a human way.) By no means! For then how could God judge the world? But if through my lie God’s truth abounds to his glory, why am I still being condemned as a sinner? And why not do evil that good may come?—as some people slanderously charge us with saying. Their condemnation is just (Romans 3:3-8).
Why don’t you just come out and say God lied?
Because God is not the author of sin. Instead it is by God's withholding of his grace and goodness that we sin. As I have recently posted in another thread, Jonathan Edwards compared it to the sun. The sun is not the source of cold and darkness, rather the lack of the sun is the cause of cold and darkness. So it is with God. God cannot be called the source of sin, for he is the source of good and light. But it is by God withholding his grace and goodness through which he allows sin to enter the world, and he allows sin to enter the world to serve his good purposes.

Why give him the glory only in the good things like salvation?

Again, God will be glorified by all things, as Romans 3 says. And I can give you plenty of examples of Calvinists who have praised God in the midst of personal loss.

Job is one good example. After all ten of his children died, he fell to the ground in worship and said, "Blessed be the name of the LORD."

And Paul's "thorn" in 2 Corinthians 12, which he describes as "a messenger of Satan to harass me". Paul knew it was an opportunity to make Jesus look glorious, as he really is, and said, "Therefore I will boast all the more gladly of my weaknesses, so that the power of Christ may rest upon me".

When John Piper was diagnosed with cancer, he wrote the article Don't Waste Your Cancer, in which he says, "You will waste your cancer if you believe it is a curse and not a gift."

I will answer your question. God does not plan our sins. Nobody can resist Gods will in this way if God wants his people to enter the Promised Land they will enter. This does not mean he could irresistibly program people to accomplish his will. Look at Jonah for example if God could programmed him to go to Nineveh he would have programmed him and he would have said I want to go to Nineveh. God made Jonah go to Nineveh by having a fish swallow him instead. Why didn’t God change his heart?

Thank you for giving an honest, well thought out answer. This is a hard topic, and first I will tell you I do not know why God chose in Jonah's case to work through a fish or in Moses' case to work through a burning bush. But I can tell you that his choices were good and sovereign and took into consideration all factors and all possibilities.

Here's how Paul answered the question; you'll see him state the question himself first. His answer is a remarkable answer, and it's not the way most people would have answered it.

You will say to me then, "Why does he still find fault? For who can resist his will?" But who are you, O man, to answer back to God? Will what is molded say to its molder, 'Why have you made me like this?' Has the potter no right over the clay, to make out of the same lump one vessel for honorable use and another for dishonorable use? What if God, desiring to show his wrath and to make known his power, has endured with much patience vessels of wrath prepared for destruction, in order to make known the riches of his glory for vessels of mercy, which he has prepared beforehand for glory (Romans 9:19-23).
What does that passage mean to you? Read the whole chapter if you'd like, so you can see why he is even bringing this question up. It's because he knows people are going to be asking this question because of what he has been teaching in the verses prior. He's preached this enough to know how people are going to respond, and he provides an answer to our questions knowing we would ask them.

I still don’t understand from your view, why did God wanted to kill his son before he created people?

That's a good question. But I think a better question is, Why did God create people? Some people have this idea that God was lonely and wanted company. That is not what I believe. I do not believe God created the world out of any sort of lack in anything he had. Before the creation of the world, the Father had the fellowship he has now in his Son and the Holy Spirit. And the Father was infinitely happy in their fellowship and company. Jonathan Edwards compared the creation of the world to the overflowing of a fountain. The Father was so happy and so pleased with his Son that his abundant love spilt forth into creation.

God created the world to magnify and glorify his Son, to bring all honor and praise to the one he loves most. And God created a world where his Son would come and die for us so that his Son would receive the praise that only a Lamb who bought us with his blood could. That's why the first thing Jesus prayed in his great prayer before being taken away to be crucified was, "Father, the hour has come; glorify your Son that the Son may glorify you" (John 17:1).

That's why I believe God planned before the creation of the world that his Son would die for our sins. When God planned the creation of the world, he did so in such a way that his love for his Son would be most echoed in the praises of the sinners he bought with his blood.

"Now is my soul troubled. And what shall I say? 'Father, save me from this hour'? But for this purpose I have come to this hour. Father, glorify your name." Then a voice came from heaven: "I have glorified it, and I will glorify it again" (John 12:27-28).
May God's grace, mercy, and peace be with you,
Nathan
 
  • Like
Reactions: edie19
Upvote 0

orthedoxy

Lusavorchagan
Dec 15, 2003
533
17
pasadena california
✟764.00
Faith
Oriental Orthodox
You miss quoted Rev 13 (NASB)

8All who (A)dwell on the earth will worship him, everyone (B)whose name has not been [a]written (C)from the foundation of the world in the (D)book of life of (E)the Lamb who has been slain.
Jesus was not slain before the foundation but 2000 years ago. This verse is showing we were saved before the foundation(our names written) and yet the bible says you are saved after believe. how can you not believe we were saved before the foundation when our names were written then?
The Bible says confess with your mouth and you will be saved. Many of these verses tell us you will be saved not merely you may know you are saved. What do you do with verses like Rom 10:9 and Act 2:38 where it show you were not saved before believe?
You have not answered my other question (maybe I was not clear) Why would you say God saved a person when that person believes but not say God lied when a person lies? You say you give God the glory when a person molests a child. Would you say God is a child molester or you don’t really give him the glory?
I also don’t understand how is giving his son before we have done anything bad is love ? Explain.
 
Upvote 0

wnwall

Active Member
Aug 18, 2007
110
24
✟22,906.00
Faith
Calvinist
Marital Status
Single
You miss quoted Rev 13 (NASB)

I quoted the ESV, but it said the exact same thing this NASB quote says.

Jesus was not slain before the foundation but 2000 years ago.
Correct. I did not say Jesus was killed before the foundation of the world. I said before the foundation of the world God planned that Jesus would be killed thousands of years later.

This verse is showing we were saved before the foundation(our names written) and yet the bible says you are saved after believe.
:scratch: Are you saying the Bible is contradicting itself?

Revelation 13:8 does not say we were saved before the foundation of the world. Revelation 13:8 says God planned to save us before the foundation of the world.

how can you not believe we were saved before the foundation when our names were written then?
Because salvation comes by faith.

The Bible says confess with your mouth and you will be saved. Many of these verses tell us you will be saved not merely you may know you are saved. What do you do with verses like Rom 10:9 and Act 2:38 where it show you were not saved before believe?
See everything I said above.

You have not answered my other question (maybe I was not clear) Why would you say God saved a person when that person believes but not say God lied when a person lies?
Would you say God believed when a person believed? Of course not! Would you say God ran a mile when a person ran a mile? Of course not! God ordains all things, but in ordaining all things he is not the doer, he is the planner.

You say you give God the glory when a person molests a child. Would you say God is a child molester or you don’t really give him the glory?
Paul said God gets glory when a person molests a child. Do you agree with Paul or do you think Paul was a liar?

I also don’t understand how is giving his son before we have done anything bad is love ? Explain.
Didn't Jesus say, "Greater love has no one than this, that one lay down his life for his friends" ? If that is true, then it is only possible for God to show his love the most in a world where there is death and we deserve it. Otherwise, Christ couldn't have died for us and couldn't have showed us the greatest act of love.
 
  • Like
Reactions: xapis
Upvote 0

orthedoxy

Lusavorchagan
Dec 15, 2003
533
17
pasadena california
✟764.00
Faith
Oriental Orthodox
That verse says he wrote the names in the book of life. We know he predestined according to his foreknowledge. God wrote the names knowing the future. He knows what decisions we would make but does not create us to go to hell.
When you say "God ordains all things, but in ordaining all things he is not the doer, he is the planner."
Why do you give him credit when one comes to Christ?
If I understand you correctly you are saying God is a child molester and a liar. You even quoted verses to prove it. Am I right?
Would you sacrifice your son to show you love your son that has not come into the world? This is non-sense.
Jesus died because of our sins after we sinned Christ became the lamb and took away our sins, it was not because God wanted to kill his son so he created people that sin.
 
Upvote 0

DeaconDean

γέγονα χαλκὸς, κύμβαλον ἀλαλάζον
Jul 19, 2005
22,188
2,677
63
Gastonia N.C. (Piedmont of N.C.)
✟115,334.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
We know he predestined according to his foreknowledge.

Now here you will get an argument from me based on that sentence.

Rom. 8:29 does not teach predestination based on God's "foreknowledge."

The Greek word used there, on the surface does mean "to know before, prior knowledge of, to know before-hand," people see that and look no further. But the word used in Rom. 8:29 also means "fore-ordained."

"proginwskw - fut. prognwsomai, 2 aor. proegnwn, perf. pass. proegnwsuai (pro + ginwskw) to know before-hand, to be previously acquainted with, to determine on before-hand, to fore-ordain, to fore-know, to appoint as the subjects of future privledges,"

The New Analytical Greek Lexicon, Wesley J. Perschbacher, Hendrickson Publishing, Peabody, Mass., 01962, Ninth Printing, 2006, proginwskw, p. 345

Furthermore,

According to the dictionary (Kittel’s), K. L. Schmidt comments:

“This comparatively rare and late word is used in the Greek Bible only six times in the NT in the sense “to foreordain” “to predestinate.” Since God is eternal and has ordained everything before time, proopizein is a stronger form of opizein (to set bounds to). The synonyms and textual history show that the reference in proginwskien is the same. Rom. 8:29; ouv proginw kai prowpisen summorfouv tnv eikonov tou niou autou, Rom. 8:30; ous...prowpisen (A: proegnw) toutov kai ekalesen. The omniscient God has determined everything in advance, both persons and things in salvation history, with Jesus Christ as the goal. When Herod and Pilate work together with the Gentiles and the mob against Christ, it may be said: “h boulh [sou] prowrisen genesqai, Acts 4:28. Herein lies the hidden wisdom of God in a mystery, “hn prowrisen o qeoV pro twn aiwnwn eiV doxan hmwn,” 1 Cor. 2:7, cf. IV, 819. The goal of our predestination is divine sonship through Jesus Christ: “proorisaV hmaV eiV uioqesian dia ihsou cristou ,” Eph. 1:5. That we have our inheritance in Christ rests in the fact that we are proopisqentev kata proqesin tou ta panta energountov, Eph. 1:11.

Theological Dictionary of the New Testament, Edited by: Gerhard Kittel, Translated by: Geoffery W. Bromiley, Vol. V, “proopizw”, p. 456, K. L. Schmidt.

Lets also refer to Rudolf Bultmann’s work in this area:

“In the NT, “proginwskein” is referred to God. His foreknowledge, however, is an election or foreordination of His people (Rom. 8:29; 11:2) or Christ (1 Pet. 1:20) (> ginwskw, 698, 706). In Pastor Hermae, mandata, 4, 3, 4 it simply means
God’s foreknowledge (cf. prognwstv in 2 Cl. 9:9). On the basis of prophecy the word “proginwskein” can be used of believers in 2 Pet. 3:17, also as Pastor Hermae, similitudines, 7,5 > eklegw. Another possible meaning in Greek is that of knowing earlier, i.e., than the time speaking (cf. Demosthenes of Athens, 29, 58; Aristotle, Rhetorica, II, 21, p. 1394b, 11; Josephus, Bella Judiacum, 6,8). This is found in Acts 26:5, where the meaning is strengthened by the addition of “anwqen.” In Justin God’s “proginwskein” is Hid foreknowledge (Apol. I, 28, 2 etc.) and the “proegnwsmenoi” are believers (Apol. I, 45, 1 etc.). The polemic against determinism, however, shows that the OT view has been abandoned (Dial., 140, 4). As One who simply knows beforehand, God is called “prognwstv” in Apol., I, 44, 11 etc. as is also Christ in Dial., 35, 7; 82, 1. There is also reference to prophetic foreknowledge in Apol., I, 43, 1; 49, 6 etc. Tatian, of Syria, in Oratio ad Graecos, 19, 3, speaks of Apollo in the same terms, so that what we have here is the Greek understanding."

Theological Dictionary of the New Testament, Edited by: Gerhard Kittel, Translated by: Geoffery W. Bromiley, Vol. V, “prognwskein”, p. 457, Rudolph Bultmann commenting.

While the Greek word in Romans 8:29 does mean "fore-know, "fore-knowledge," that is not the infered meaning, it is God who called first (cf. v. 28) then "fore-ordained" and then predestinated. (cf. v. 29)

"to them who are the called according to his purpose. For whom he did foreordain, he also did predestinate to be conformed to the image of his Son, that he might be the firstborn among many brethren." -Rom. 8:28-29

If God did use His "foreknowledge" or His "fore-knowing" in determining who would or would not be among the elect, or even having their names written in the Lambs Book of Life, the that makes God a respecter of persons. And that my friend, the Bible clearly speaks against. (cf. Acts 10:34)

God Bless

Till all are one.
 
Upvote 0

UMP

Well-Known Member
Aug 16, 2004
5,022
116
✟5,772.00
Faith
Christian
Now here you will get an argument from me based on that sentence.

Rom. 8:29 does not teach predestination based on God's "foreknowledge."

Indeed!

Here is one of the best things I've read on the "foreknowledge" of God.


........Another thing to which we desire to call particular attention is that the first two passages quoted above show plainly and teach implicitly that God's "foreknowledge" is not causative, that instead, something else lies behind, precedes it. and that something is His own sovereign decree. Christ was "delivered by the (1) determinate counsel and (2) foreknowledge of God" (Acts 2:23). His "counsel" or decree was the ground of His foreknowledge. So again in Rom. 8:29. That verse opens with the word "for," which tells us to look back to what immediately precedes. What, then, does the previous verse say? This, "all things work together for good to them . . . who are the called according to His purpose." Thus God's "foreknowledge" is based upon His purpose" or decree (see Psa. 2:7).

God foreknows what will be because He has decreed what shall be. It is therefore a reversing of the order of Scripture, a putting of the cart before the horse, to affirm that God elects because He foreknows people. The truth is, He "foreknows" because He has elected. This removes the ground or cause of election from the creature, and places it in God's own sovereign will. God purposed in Himself to elect a certain people, not because of anything good in them or from them, either actual or foreseen, but solely out of His own mere pleasure. As to why He chose the ones He did, we do not know, and can only say, "Even so, Father, for it seemed good in Thy sight." The plain truth of Rom. 8:29 is that God, before the foundation of the world, singled out certain sinners and appointed them unto salvation (II Thess. 2:13).

This is clear from the concluding words of the verse: "Predestinated to be conformed to the image of His son," etc. God did not predestinate those whom he foreknew were "conformed," but, on the contrary, those whom he "foreknew" (i.e.. loved and elected) He predestinated "to be conformed." Their conformity to Christ is not the cause, but the effect of God's foreknowledge and predestination. God did not elect any sinner because He foresaw that he would believe, for the simple but sufficient reason that no sinner ever does believe until God gives him faith; just as no man sees until God gives him sight. Sight is God's gift, seeing is the consequence of my using His gift. So faith is God's gift (Eph. 2:8,9), believing is the consequence of my using His gift. If it were true that God had elected certain ones to be saved because in due time they would believe, then that would make believing a meritorious act, and in that event the saved sinner would have ground for "boasting," which Scripture emphatically denies: Eph. 2:9.

A.W. Pink
http://users.aol.com/libcfl/foreknow.htm
 
Upvote 0

orthedoxy

Lusavorchagan
Dec 15, 2003
533
17
pasadena california
✟764.00
Faith
Oriental Orthodox
So what is Rom 8:29 is saying?
What about 1 Pet 1:2who have been chosen according to the foreknowledge of God the Father, through the sanctifying work of the Spirit, for obedience to Jesus Christ and sprinkling by his blood:
How could God elect when people didn't exist?
If he did elect before creation wouldn't that mean we were saved before believe? If so why does scripture say we are not saved before believe?
Wnwall interpreted scripture to say it was God doing the evil.
Also did God want to sacrafice his son so he created man?
 
Upvote 0

wnwall

Active Member
Aug 18, 2007
110
24
✟22,906.00
Faith
Calvinist
Marital Status
Single
That verse says he wrote the names in the book of life. We know he predestined according to his foreknowledge. God wrote the names knowing the future.

If you want to buy a house, and you don't have the money, but you borrow it in order to provide a home for your family, you know that's going to mean you'll have to work extra hard to pay off the loan. And you're willing to work extra hard to pay off the loan because you want your family to have a house. That's called a plan. You do not have to buy your family a house. You can live in your car, you can get an apartment for a cheaper rate, but you want your family to have a house, so you plan to borrow the money and work extra hard to pay it off. That's a plan.

Before God created us, he knew we would sin, you agree with that. God could have not created us, or he could have created us a different way. But God wanted to create us the way he did, that's obvious by the fact that we're here. If he hadn't wanted to create humans who would fall to sin he had plenty of ways to not do it that way. (1) He could have not created Satan; he knew Satan would sin before creating Satan. (2) He could have prevented Satan from tempting Eve; he knew Satan would tempt Eve and he allowed it. (3) He could have not created the tree of knowledge of good and evil; when he created the tree he already knew Adam and Eve would eat from it; he could have simply not created it. (4) He could have prevented Eve from taking the fruit. (5) He could have prevented Eve from giving the fruit to Adam. (6) He could have simply not created Adam and Eve; he knew exactly what would happen when he created them, just like you would know you'd have to work extra hard to pay off a loan. (7) He could have created Adam and Eve in a different way.

This list can go on and on. At the end of the day, we are left knowing one basic thing: God did it this way because this is the way God wanted to do it. It does not matter how you conceive on the immediate causality. It makes no difference if you think he predestined because he foreknew or he foreknew because he predestined. It's still a plan.

In your case, you wanted to work extra hard so that you could buy a house for your family. In God's case, we know he wanted Christ to endure suffering long before he created the world because Christ did endure suffering and God knew he would suffer before creating the world. But it would be wrong of me to say you took out a loan simply because you wanted to work hard. You didn't take out a loan because you wanted to work hard, you wanted to work hard so you could pay off the loan that you took out because you wanted to buy a house. Similarly, God did not create the world because he wanted his Son to suffer. God wanted his Son to suffer so that his Son could get the praise that only a suffering Savior can. God created the world so that his Son would be praised by the redeemed, and in order to get his Son the praise that only a Redeemer can, he created a world in which his Son would suffer. This is easy to understand, and it's clear in the Bible. I have offered numerous scriptural references, and you have simply ignored them and said, "That's not my God." If your God did not inspire the scriptures, then what God do you worship?

He knows what decisions we would make but does not create us to go to hell.
You will say to me then, "Why does he still find fault? For who can resist his will?" But who are you, O man, to answer back to God? Will what is molded say to its molder, "Why have you made me like this?" Has the potter no right over the clay, to make out of the same lump one vessel for honorable use and another for dishonorable use? What if God, desiring to show his wrath and to make known his power, has endured with much patience vessels of wrath prepared for destruction, in order to make known the riches of his glory for vessels of mercy, which he has prepared beforehand for glory (Romans 9).

If I understand you correctly you are saying God is a child molester and a liar. You even quoted verses to prove it. Am I right?
No. God is no child molester, nor is he a murderer, nor is he a thief, nor has he ever done anyone wrong. To say God is a child molester is to accuse him of doing someone wrong. God has planned that every child molestation happen, but in doing it he has done no one wrong, and he was not the molester; the molester was the person doing the molesting.

You meant evil against me, but God meant it for good (Genesis 50:20).

The LORD gave, and the LORD has taken away; blessed be the name of the LORD
(Job 1:21).
You interpret it. What does Job 1:21 mean? To remind you, Job had just lost all ten of his children when the roof of the house collapsed where they were eating, and his response is, "God gave me my children, and God took them from me; blessed be his name."

I form light and create darkness, I make well-being and create calamity, I am the LORD, who does all these things (Isaiah 45:7).

Does disaster come to a city unless the LORD has done it? (Amos 3:6)
God planned the airplanes to crash into the World Trade Center on 9/11. 9/11 was a great disaster in New York. Amos 3:6 says, no disaster comes to a city unless God does it. Can you interpret it another way? This is not a complicated exegesis; it's simply reading the Bible and believing it means what it says, rather than ignoring what it says and believing what you want it to mean.

God bless,
Nathan
 
Upvote 0

orthedoxy

Lusavorchagan
Dec 15, 2003
533
17
pasadena california
✟764.00
Faith
Oriental Orthodox
If you want to buy a house, and you don't have the money, but you borrow it in order to provide a home for your family, you know that's going to mean you'll have to work extra hard to pay off the loan. And you're willing to work extra hard to pay off the loan because you want your family to have a house. That's called a plan. You do not have to buy your family a house. You can live in your car, you can get an apartment for a cheaper rate, but you want your family to have a house, so you plan to borrow the money and work extra hard to pay it off. That's a plan.

Before God created us, he knew we would sin, you agree with that. God could have not created us, or he could have created us a different way. But God wanted to create us the way he did, that's obvious by the fact that we're here. If he hadn't wanted to create humans who would fall to sin he had plenty of ways to not do it that way. (1) He could have not created Satan; he knew Satan would sin before creating Satan. (2) He could have prevented Satan from tempting Eve; he knew Satan would tempt Eve and he allowed it. (3) He could have not created the tree of knowledge of good and evil; when he created the tree he already knew Adam and Eve would eat from it; he could have simply not created it. (4) He could have prevented Eve from taking the fruit. (5) He could have prevented Eve from giving the fruit to Adam. (6) He could have simply not created Adam and Eve; he knew exactly what would happen when he created them, just like you would know you'd have to work extra hard to pay off a loan. (7) He could have created Adam and Eve in a different way.

This list can go on and on. At the end of the day, we are left knowing one basic thing: God did it this way because this is the way God wanted to do it. It does not matter how you conceive on the immediate causality. It makes no difference if you think he predestined because he foreknew or he foreknew because he predestined. It's still a plan.

In your case, you wanted to work extra hard so that you could buy a house for your family. In God's case, we know he wanted Christ to endure suffering long before he created the world because Christ did endure suffering and God knew he would suffer before creating the world. But it would be wrong of me to say you took out a loan simply because you wanted to work hard. You didn't take out a loan because you wanted to work hard, you wanted to work hard so you could pay off the loan that you took out because you wanted to buy a house. Similarly, God did not create the world because he wanted his Son to suffer. God wanted his Son to suffer so that his Son could get the praise that only a suffering Savior can. God created the world so that his Son would be praised by the redeemed, and in order to get his Son the praise that only a Redeemer can, he created a world in which his Son would suffer. This is easy to understand, and it's clear in the Bible. I have offered numerous scriptural references, and you have simply ignored them and said, "That's not my God." If your God did not inspire the scriptures, then what God do you worship?


You will say to me then, "Why does he still find fault? For who can resist his will?" But who are you, O man, to answer back to God? Will what is molded say to its molder, "Why have you made me like this?" Has the potter no right over the clay, to make out of the same lump one vessel for honorable use and another for dishonorable use? What if God, desiring to show his wrath and to make known his power, has endured with much patience vessels of wrath prepared for destruction, in order to make known the riches of his glory for vessels of mercy, which he has prepared beforehand for glory (Romans 9).

No. God is no child molester, nor is he a murderer, nor is he a thief, nor has he ever done anyone wrong. To say God is a child molester is to accuse him of doing someone wrong. God has planned that every child molestation happen, but in doing it he has done no one wrong, and he was not the molester; the molester was the person doing the molesting.


You meant evil against me, but God meant it for good (Genesis 50:20).


The LORD gave, and the LORD has taken away; blessed be the name of the LORD (Job 1:21).
You interpret it. What does Job 1:21 mean? To remind you, Job had just lost all ten of his children when the roof of the house collapsed where they were eating, and his response is, "God gave me my children, and God took them from me; blessed be his name."


I form light and create darkness, I make well-being and create calamity, I am the LORD, who does all these things (Isaiah 45:7).


Does disaster come to a city unless the LORD has done it? (Amos 3:6)
God planned the airplanes to crash into the World Trade Center on 9/11. 9/11 was a great disaster in New York. Amos 3:6 says, no disaster comes to a city unless God does it. Can you interpret it another way? This is not a complicated exegesis; it's simply reading the Bible and believing it means what it says, rather than ignoring what it says and believing what you want it to mean.

God bless,
Nathan
If God Does the disaster, "Does disaster come to a city unless the LORD has done it?"
 
Upvote 0

BBAS 64

Contributor
Site Supporter
Aug 21, 2003
10,049
1,801
60
New England
✟614,644.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
If God Does the disaster, "Does disaster come to a city unless the LORD has done it?"
The Lord killed Job's kids and from the verses you misquoted shows God is the child molester, is the thief and is the liar.
I don't know why you are trying to defend your God just come out and say it God is the child molester and the liar.

Good Day, Othedoxy

Misquoted:scratch:

You must have a really funky EO translation, or your reading skills are in need of some help :p

In Him,

Bill
 
Upvote 0

BBAS 64

Contributor
Site Supporter
Aug 21, 2003
10,049
1,801
60
New England
✟614,644.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
That verse says he wrote the names in the book of life. We know he predestined according to his foreknowledge. God wrote the names knowing the future. He knows what decisions we would make but does not create us to go to hell.
When you say "God ordains all things, but in ordaining all things he is not the doer, he is the planner."
Why do you give him credit when one comes to Christ?
If I understand you correctly you are saying God is a child molester and a liar. You even quoted verses to prove it. Am I right?
Would you sacrifice your son to show you love your son that has not come into the world? This is non-sense.
Jesus died because of our sins after we sinned Christ became the lamb and took away our sins, it was not because God wanted to kill his son so he created people that sin.

Good Day,

WE KNOW...

You must have a mouse under your hat :ebil:

As for your other assertions, they are just that "baseless'.


In Him,

Bill
 
Upvote 0

wnwall

Active Member
Aug 18, 2007
110
24
✟22,906.00
Faith
Calvinist
Marital Status
Single
If God Does the disaster, "Does disaster come to a city unless the LORD has done it?"
The Lord killed Job's kids and from the verses you misquoted shows God is the child molester, is the thief and is the liar.
I don't know why you are trying to defend your God just come out and say it God is the child molester and the liar.

Ok, we'll part ways here. If you have no more questions, all I can ask is that you read your Bible and consider what it says.

Nathan
 
Upvote 0

Elect

It is God that Justifies
Jun 9, 2005
403
22
59
Wichita Falls, TX
Visit site
✟667.00
Faith
Calvinist
Marital Status
Married
Do Calvinists believe that God predestined the fall, and that God had meant to have Adam and Eve take of the "fruit"?
Yes. Why do you think that God put the tree of knowledge of good and evil in the garden and made a law that He knew would be broken? The law being do not eat from that tree. Did God hope for a different outcome?

Eph 1:11 In whom also we have obtained an inheritance, being predestinated according to the purpose of him who worketh all things after the counsel of his own will:

When did He start working all things out after the counsel of His will? Was it yesterday?
 
Upvote 0

orthedoxy

Lusavorchagan
Dec 15, 2003
533
17
pasadena california
✟764.00
Faith
Oriental Orthodox
Yes. Why do you think that God put the tree of knowledge of good and evil in the garden and made a law that He knew would be broken? The law being do not eat from that tree. Did God hope for a different outcome?

Eph 1:11 In whom also we have obtained an inheritance, being predestinated according to the purpose of him who worketh all things after the counsel of his own will:

When did He start working all things out after the counsel of His will? Was it yesterday?
Do Calvinists believe God is powerful enough to create man with free will to eat or not to eat?
 
Upvote 0

bradfordl

Veteran
Mar 20, 2006
1,510
181
✟25,108.00
Faith
Calvinist
Marital Status
Married
Do Calvinists believe God is powerful enough to create man with free will to eat or not to eat?
Do arminians believe that God is powerful enough to create a rock too heavy for Him to move?

"Power" to do something contrary to His nature is not coherent. God knows all things. To create something that is capable of defeating His omniscience is incoherent. How would He know all things if there were something a man could do that He did not know would happen? You maybe infer that God plays peek-a-boo with Himself? Mighty hilarious scenario to cling to so's you can keep your self importance intact, don't you think?
 
Upvote 0

orthedoxy

Lusavorchagan
Dec 15, 2003
533
17
pasadena california
✟764.00
Faith
Oriental Orthodox
Do arminians believe that God is powerful enough to create a rock too heavy for Him to move?

"Power" to do something contrary to His nature is not coherent. God knows all things. To create something that is capable of defeating His omniscience is incoherent. How would He know all things if there were something a man could do that He did not know would happen? You maybe infer that God plays peek-a-boo with Himself? Mighty hilarious scenario to cling to so's you can keep your self importance intact, don't you think?
God knew what Adam was going to do before Adam ate of The Fruit. He didn't create him to eat it.
The scriptures never say he created him to eat of the fruit. God was angry when Adam ate of the fruit that shows God didn't create Adam to eat the fruit.
Why do you accept there are something’s God can't do and not accept there are something’s God can't know?
 
Upvote 0

bradfordl

Veteran
Mar 20, 2006
1,510
181
✟25,108.00
Faith
Calvinist
Marital Status
Married
First:
God knew what Adam was going to do before Adam ate of The Fruit.
Then:
He didn't create him to eat it.
If God knew Adam was going to eat the fruit before he did so, then one of the purposes He created him for was to eat of the fruit. Your statement is incoherent.

The scriptures never say he created him to eat of the fruit. God was angry when Adam ate of the fruit that shows God didn't create Adam to eat the fruit.
They never say He didn't either, but it can be easily deduced from the simple fact that God is omniscient. Nothing happens that He has not decreed. He created Adam to eat the fruit because Adam ate the fruit. Very simple.

Why do you accept there are something’s God can't do and not accept there are something’s God can't know?

The things one might say "God can't do" would fall into the category of things that would defeat His omnipotence (rock He can't move), or that of things that are contrary to His nature (lie, steal, adultery, etc.). The idea that there are things God can't know would defeat both His omnipotence and His omniscience, and is therefore impossible. It would also be contrary to His nature in that His purposes are always holy and good, and if there is anything outside of His knowledge or control that thing can defeat the holiness of His purposes.

So it's not so much a matter of what He can't do, but what He won't do, and one of those things is play peek-a-boo with Himself as you seem to infer. How can God intentionally not know something that He could know? Or are you saying there are things that He could not know even if He wanted to know them? That is a portrayal of God as subjugable to the will of others, and borders on blasphemy.
 
Upvote 0