I guess that's why I am wary of terms such as 'sin' and 'repentence' - they come with a cargo load of baggage; can mean different things to different people, and can simply cause non churchgoers to glaze over. Perhaps the language we use needs to evolve to cope with connotations that words gather over years. I like your break down of what it means to you, but you had to explain it.
I tend to lean towards reclaiming their true biblical meaning. But, I can see how words like these can be problematic who have only ever heard them misused and abused.
What do you mean by this? Do you mean when people divorce prematurely?
Some people divorce for no reason other than that they are tired of their spouse, they are escaping a momentarily unpleasant situation, etc. Sometimes divorce happens without a good reason (no abuse, no adultery, no fundamental dysfunction in the relationship, just boredom or laziness). Not that this is common, but we should acknowledge that some people just take divorce too casually.
I still say, and maybe especially since you must have seen so many divorces that it may become like seeing the wood for the trees, that every situation is different. If you mean none are 'without sin' I completely agree, I would certainly not claim that for myself, even though my ex was abusive. However, there is a difference between not having reacted in the most Christlike way in all situations, if you will, and in there being equal weight in bringing about the actual divorce. Making the mistake of marrying someone damaging is hardly a share of blame, and neither is reacting badly to being mistreated. I'm surprised you don't seem to allow a case of justification for abusive situations, although as I understand it, the courts assume that everyone is lying at least a little bit to protect their corner.
Just remember I am not talking about blame, but rather about recognizing unhealthy patterns so that you don't repeat them. Blame is focused on the past. But, if one is going to learn from a failed marriage, it should be an opportunity to look at one's past mistakes. A victim of abuse might ask "why was a I drawn to an abusive person?" or "what caused me to put up with it?". An addict might ask "how did my addiction hurt my marriage?" or "how do I get help with overcoming my addiction?" There is really nothing that you can do to fix the other person's deficiencies, so there is no benefit to focusing on them. It's up to them if they want to change or not.
Also, just to be clear, I am talking about looking at it after the fact. Certainly, while a divorce is pending and for a while thereafter, a period of grief is important. And, the grieving period is not really the best time to sort through one's personal shortcomings. But, at some point, if we are to be healthy, we need to move past the grief and into an honest appraisal of what happened and what our role in it was.
I like this!! This is my experience, but I had never thought of it this way.
That I draw a lot from my own divorce and remarriage. My divorce was the official end of a terribly unhealthy relationship. But, the lessons I learned from it shaped my attitudes, which helped me to meet my current wife, with whom I have a much healthier relationship. And, this not because she is a better person than my ex, but because I am a healthier person than I was when I was married to my ex.