• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

The Eucharist: Symbolic, Real Presence, Transubstantiation

CaliforniaJosiah

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Aug 6, 2005
17,496
1,568
✟229,195.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Lutheran
Marital Status
Private
Politics
US-Republican
It is what it is, body and blood and bread and wine; no more, no less.


.... exactly, literally, as Jesus said and Paul penned.


And obviously, that's all Luther personally meant by twice in his life saying body and blood with bread and wine. No replacement of what is written with pagan philosophies.





.
 
Upvote 0

Erose

Newbie
Jul 2, 2010
9,009
1,471
✟75,992.00
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
Neither can we witewash Aquinas's transubstantiation.;)

It is what it is, body and blood and bread and wine; no more, no less.

Pax Domini
Why should we? We are not claiming that the discipline of philosophy is exclusively pagan as you and CJ are claiming. Also Aquinas did not "invent" the doctrine of transubstantiation. It came before him. Way before him.
 
  • Like
Reactions: MrPolo
Upvote 0

Rick Otto

The Dude Abides
Nov 19, 2002
34,112
7,406
On The Prairie
✟29,593.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
It seems then that you and I both must wait until we stand in Heaven to have our "truths" confirmed.

In the mean time, may God continue to bless us all.:)
Indeed God has blessed us with the truth right now.
Heaven confirms only one truth.
Don't wait too long to stand on it.
 
Upvote 0

MarkRohfrietsch

Unapologetic Apologist
Site Supporter
Dec 8, 2007
30,981
5,810
✟1,008,144.00
Country
Canada
Gender
Male
Faith
Lutheran
Marital Status
Married
Indeed God has blessed us with the truth right now.
Heaven confirms only one truth.
Don't wait too long to stand on it.

I'm willing to walk away; I have thrown much seed on barren ground. There is no need to continually goad those of us, the overwhelming majority of Christians who hold the real presence by implying that we are without truth.

While this issue is of great importance to those of us who hold the real presence, for those who deny it, one would think that it's of little consequence. Should not we, as Scripture tells us, also dwell on faith in Christ, and the salvation that He has won for us?

You believe we are wrong, we believe you are wrong; you know you are right, as we also know that we are right. Can we not discuss our differences without trying to belittle and insult each others understanding of Scripture?

I was always told by reformed protestants that one must study Scripture, and through this study, come to a personal understanding and relationship; all tell me that this is a key doctrine and teaching of many reformed Congregations/denominations.

I think it's time some here suck it up, and come to the realization that not all of us have the same "personal understanding". Your understanding comes from the context which you view Scripture, ours comes from the context which we view Scripture; part of which happens to be the 2000 year old "tradition" of Apostolic teaching.

You also derive context from "traditions", which are only a few hundred years old, and I might add, at odds with apostolic teaching, which we know by faith was given to us in Scripture, and seamlessly taught over the millennia by the ECFs, and the Church catholic; which are retained, held, seamlessly taught, and believed by only a small number of denominations, but the largest number of Christians.

May the Holy Spirit increase in all of us true knowledge of our Lord through His Holy word, so that we may walk in His Will, to the Glory of His Holy name! Amen! :crossrc::crossrc::prayer::prayer::crossrc::crossrc:
 
  • Like
Reactions: MrPolo
Upvote 0

Rick Otto

The Dude Abides
Nov 19, 2002
34,112
7,406
On The Prairie
✟29,593.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
I'm willing to let you have the last word, but not if it is a false note.
Why not assume it is of equal importance?
Maybe you feel goaded because it is too important for some reason.

You have the popular position & a long tradition of it on your side.
Shouldn't you care less what the odd guy out says?

I haven't implied anything, sir. I have stated plainly exactly what the truth is.
This is a thread on the Eucharist. If you want to dwell on your faith in Christ you are welcome to start that thread.
Have I complained of your belittlements & insults direct or implied? I'm "barren ground"?

If you feel belittled & insulted by someone explaining the definition of a metaphor, informing you how to recognize one, explaining to you that the meaning it conveys is far greater than the miracle you imagine, then you need to look for another forum because you lack the coping skills to rationaly, not emotionaly, discuss & confront issues that challenge your dearly held beliefs in what truth is.

Produce the apostolic quote that supports real presence or transubstantiation without bald-faced denial of metaphor & your claim will have some integrity, otherwise you are just grandstanding for the crowd about being apostolic in this particular belief.

Suck up what you will, but if it includes intellectual dishonesty regarding metaphors & vain imaginations regarding miracles & matter, you can have all the smug security your blanket of demographics can afford you.
 
Upvote 0

MarkRohfrietsch

Unapologetic Apologist
Site Supporter
Dec 8, 2007
30,981
5,810
✟1,008,144.00
Country
Canada
Gender
Male
Faith
Lutheran
Marital Status
Married
I'm willing to let you have the last word, but not if it is a false note.
Why not assume it is of equal importance?
Maybe you feel goaded because it is too important for some reason.

You have the popular position & a long tradition of it on your side.
Shouldn't you care less what the odd guy out says?

I haven't implied anything, sir. I have stated plainly exactly what the truth is.
This is a thread on the Eucharist. If you want to dwell on your faith in Christ you are welcome to start that thread.
Have I complained of your belittlements & insults direct or implied? I'm "barren ground"?

If you feel belittled & insulted by someone explaining the definition of a metaphor, informing you how to recognize one, explaining to you that the meaning it conveys is far greater than the miracle you imagine, then you need to look for another forum because you lack the coping skills to rationaly, not emotionaly, discuss & confront issues that challenge your dearly held beliefs in what truth is.

Produce the apostolic quote that supports real presence or transubstantiation without bald-faced denial of metaphor & your claim will have some integrity, otherwise you are just grandstanding for the crowd about being apostolic in this particular belief.

Suck up what you will, but if it includes intellectual dishonesty regarding metaphors & vain imaginations regarding miracles & matter, you can have all the smug security your blanket of demographics can afford you.

Rick, if this is a metaphor, then so is the rest of Scripture; and both our faiths are in vain.

This is my last post here, so you will be free of that bothersome Mark; who may very well be a metaphor himself of something totally different:D:D^_^^_^:D:D.

God bless.:liturgy:
 
Upvote 0

virgilio

Newbie
Aug 21, 2011
975
63
✟23,951.00
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
In light of circumstances wherein there is ongoing discussion about the breaking of bread and drinking of wine which was done by Jesus in the night he was betrayed which happen in celebration of Passover.

We cannot deny that this really happen, but are every one of us sure if what is the meaning of this which happen in Last Supper? Can it not be a hyperbole wherein he substitute bread as a metaphor for his body? and wine or grape juice as substitute for his blood?

Let us ask ourselves, which did he offer a bread or his body and what is the blood of the new covenant? was it wine? Are we not mistaken for not knowing the meaning of this?

Let us look back from the beginning before Jesus preaches his ministry. From the beginning what was He? The "WORD" of God and the "Word was made flesh" so the word was made body of Jesus.

Forward to 1 Cor 11 he took bread and break it, and said.Take, eat, this is my body which is broken for you. so the bread or body is a word breakthrough that we must eat Jeremiah 15:16 Thy words were found, and I did eat them, and thy word was unto me the joy and rejoicing of mine hearts: for I am called by thy name, O LORD God of host.

This is the new law in New Covenant that shall be written in our mind and hearts Hebrews 8:10 or in book of memory Malachi 3:16

Hope this help.
your brother in Christ.
virgilio
 
Upvote 0

CaliforniaJosiah

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Aug 6, 2005
17,496
1,568
✟229,195.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Lutheran
Marital Status
Private
Politics
US-Republican
In light of circumstances wherein there is ongoing discussion about the breaking of bread and drinking of wine which was done by Jesus in the night he was betrayed which happen in celebration of Passover.

We cannot deny that this really happen, but are every one of us sure if what is the meaning of this which happen in Last Supper? Can it not be a hyperbole wherein he substitute bread as a metaphor for his body? and wine or grape juice as substitute for his blood?

Yes, it's POSSIBLE.

It's one of the options in the opening post.

I think it's also possible that He meant just what He said - and that we should leave it where and as He did - with nothing added or subtracted.



Thank you for adding to the discussion!


- Josiah




.
 
Upvote 0

virgilio

Newbie
Aug 21, 2011
975
63
✟23,951.00
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
Yes, it's POSSIBLE.

It's one of the options in the opening post.

I think it's also possible that He meant just what He said - and that we should leave it where and as He did - with nothing added or subtracted.

Hi CaliforniaJosiah greetings;
[FONT=&quot]I’m afraid that you might not understand clearly my points so, let me make some vignettes[/FONT]
[FONT=&quot]I’m that may help to in describing my position about the bread and wine which is in truth was used as a metaphor in the Lord’s Supper to symbolize the body and blood of Jesus.[/FONT]
[FONT=&quot]I do agree that we shall not add or take away words in the book of the Lord; but let me emphasize that God in many times has made some changes or transliteration in some facts[/FONT]
[FONT=&quot]eg. when he changes the name of Abram to Abraham when he made a promise of Covenant with him and the name of Sarai to Sarah. God also made a changes in the name of Jacob when he struggled with an angel and call his name Israel wherein a nation and tribes forebear. [/FONT]
[FONT=&quot]In the Lord’s Supper in the night Passover Jesus made a substitution of offering when he used bread in place of a Lamb and wine as substitutes for blood of bulls.m [/FONT]
[FONT=&quot]
[/FONT]

[FONT=&quot]Matthew 26:[/FONT][FONT=&quot]26-27 While they were eating, Jesus took bread, gave thanks and broke it, and gave it to his disciples, saying, "Take and eat; this is my body." [/FONT][FONT=&quot]
[/FONT]
[FONT=&quot]v.27. Then he took the cup (wine), gave thanks and offered it to them, saying, "Drink from it, all of you.[/FONT]
[FONT=&quot]
[/FONT]

[FONT=&quot]In 1 Corinthians 11:24-25 he gave this as an ordinances “do this in remembrance of me” this is to be an ordinance or a new law under a new covenant. Jesus know that he is about to give his life as a propitiation of the sin of the world and he knows that as written in Galatians 4:15 Brethren, I speak after the manner of man; though it be a man’s covenant, yet it be confirmed, no man disannuleth, or added thereto.
Hebrews 9:17 For a testament is of force after men are dead: otherwise it is of no strength at all while the testator liveth. [/FONT]

[FONT=&quot]
In verse 25 After the same manner also he took the cup, when he had supped, saying, This cup is the new testament in my blood; this do ye, as oft as you drink it in remembrance of me.[/FONT]

[FONT=&quot]
The radical substitution of bread in lieu of meat of a lamb is a metaphoric and symbolism of the body and blood of Christ in the Lord’s Supper is mystery which had been hidden since the foundation of the world and a man cannot understand this without revelation from the Holy Ghost which Jesus promises he will sent to his believers in John 14:26 the Comforter or interpreter that shall teaches us of all things (emphasis mine) [/FONT]
[FONT=&quot]

[/FONT]
[FONT=&quot]This is in parallel of the day of Pentecost wherein the Holy Ghost gives gifts to believer when they were enable to speak in tongue (but not the glosollalia) but a heavenly language Paul manifested in 2 Corinthians 12:4[/FONT][FONT=&quot] "unspeakable words, which is not lawful for a man to utter.[/FONT]


Thank you and God bless.
your brother in Christ.
virgilio
 
Upvote 0

CaliforniaJosiah

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Aug 6, 2005
17,496
1,568
✟229,195.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Lutheran
Marital Status
Private
Politics
US-Republican
Yes, it's POSSIBLE.

It's one of the options in the opening post.

I think it's also possible that He meant just what He said - and that we should leave it where and as He did - with nothing added or subtracted.

Hi CaliforniaJosiah greetings;
[FONT=&quot]I’m afraid that you might not understand clearly my points so, let me make some vignettes[/FONT]
[FONT=&quot]I’m that may help to in describing my position about the bread and wine which is in truth was used as a metaphor in the Lord’s Supper to symbolize the body and blood of Jesus.[/FONT]
[FONT=&quot]I do agree that we shall not add or take away words in the book of the Lord; but let me emphasize that God in many times has made some changes or transliteration in some facts[/FONT]
[FONT=&quot]eg. when he changes the name of Abram to Abraham when he made a promise of Covenant with him and the name of Sarai to Sarah. God also made a changes in the name of Jacob when he struggled with an angel and call his name Israel wherein a nation and tribes forebear. [/FONT]
[FONT=&quot]In the Lord’s Supper in the night Passover Jesus made a substitution of offering when he used bread in place of a Lamb and wine as substitutes for blood of bulls.m [/FONT]
[FONT=&quot]
[/FONT]

[FONT=&quot]Matthew 26:[/FONT][FONT=&quot]26-27 While they were eating, Jesus took bread, gave thanks and broke it, and gave it to his disciples, saying, "Take and eat; this is my body." [/FONT][FONT=&quot]
[/FONT]
[FONT=&quot]v.27. Then he took the cup (wine), gave thanks and offered it to them, saying, "Drink from it, all of you.[/FONT]
[FONT=&quot]
[/FONT]

[FONT=&quot]In 1 Corinthians 11:24-25 he gave this as an ordinances “do this in remembrance of me” this is to be an ordinance or a new law under a new covenant. Jesus know that he is about to give his life as a propitiation of the sin of the world and he knows that as written in Galatians 4:15 Brethren, I speak after the manner of man; though it be a man’s covenant, yet it be confirmed, no man disannuleth, or added thereto.
Hebrews 9:17 For a testament is of force after men are dead: otherwise it is of no strength at all while the testator liveth. [/FONT]

[FONT=&quot]
In verse 25 After the same manner also he took the cup, when he had supped, saying, This cup is the new testament in my blood; this do ye, as oft as you drink it in remembrance of me.[/FONT]

[FONT=&quot]
The radical substitution of bread in lieu of meat of a lamb is a metaphoric and symbolism of the body and blood of Christ in the Lord’s Supper is mystery which had been hidden since the foundation of the world and a man cannot understand this without revelation from the Holy Ghost which Jesus promises he will sent to his believers in John 14:26 the Comforter or interpreter that shall teaches us of all things (emphasis mine) [/FONT]
[FONT=&quot]

[/FONT]
[FONT=&quot]This is in parallel of the day of Pentecost wherein the Holy Ghost gives gifts to believer when they were enable to speak in tongue (but not the glosollalia) but a heavenly language Paul manifested in 2 Corinthians 12:4[/FONT][FONT=&quot] "unspeakable words, which is not lawful for a man to utter.[/FONT]


Thank you and God bless.
your brother in Christ.
virgilio



Again, yes - you may take Jesus' words (and Paul's inspired writing) as symbolic - a "metaphor". Read the opening post. That IS one of the 3 options given.

I SIMPLY pointed out there are other possibilities - including that what is said is what is meant, simply taking it all at "face value." Typically, in hermeneutics, we accept what is said as what is meant unless there is something textually to indicate a "figure of speech" is being used. IMO, part of the difficulty of such in the Eucharistic texts is not only that there is nothing to indicate that Jesus is speaking figuratively or symbolicly but that it's not embraced with any consistency. The Roman Catholic says "bread" and "wine" aren't meant literally but "body" and "blood" are - an entirely arbitrary "split" interpretation- half is, half isn't. The Zwinglist Protestant takes the same view, the same split interpretation, the same split "half of this verse is literal, half is symbolic" hermeneutic, they just don't agree on which is literal and which is symbolic but it's the same view, same hermeneutic. I'm simply saying it's POSSIBLE that Jesus meant what He said, Paul meant what he penned by inspiration, nothing added and nothing taken away: that's the other option.


Thank you.


Pax


- Josiah




.
 
Upvote 0

virgilio

Newbie
Aug 21, 2011
975
63
✟23,951.00
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
Again, yes - you may take Jesus' words (and Paul's inspired writing) as symbolic - a "metaphor". Read the opening post. That IS one of the 3 options given.

I SIMPLY pointed out there are other possibilities - including that what is said is what is meant, simply taking it all at "face value." Typically, in hermeneutics, we accept what is said as what is meant unless there is something textually to indicate a "figure of speech" is being used. IMO, part of the difficulty of such in the Eucharistic texts is not only that there is nothing to indicate that Jesus is speaking figuratively or symbolicly but that it's not embraced with any consistency. The Roman Catholic says "bread" and "wine" aren't meant literally but "body" and "blood" are - an entirely arbitrary "split" interpretation- half is, half isn't. The Zwinglist Protestant takes the same view, the same split interpretation, the same split "half of this verse is literal, half is symbolic" hermeneutic, they just don't agree on which is literal and which is symbolic but it's the same view, same hermeneutic. I'm simply saying it's POSSIBLE that Jesus meant what He said, Paul meant what he penned by inspiration, nothing added and nothing taken away: that's the other option.

Thank you.

Pax

- Josiah
.


Hi California Josiah, greetings,

Typically, in hermeneutics, we accept what is said as what is meant unless there is something textually to indicate a "figure of speech" is being used. IMO

I would like to pursue the option of figurative speech that Jesus do when he preach in John 6:50-58 and John 7:38-39. It is needless to say that we have literal food to sustain our physical growth and health and we also need spiritual food for enhancement and regeneration of our spirit.

We clothed ourselves with fine clothing that fitted our taste and fashion and we must also have the spiritual raiment to cover our spiritual nakedness which means lack of knowledge about God. Herewith is figurative speech of Jesus which we cannot took literally:

John 6:27 Do not work for the food that disappears, but for the food that remains to eternal life – the food which the Son of Man will give to you. For God the Father has put his seal of approval on him.”

John 6:50-58 This is the bread that has come down from heaven, so that a person may eat from it and not die.
6:51 I am the living bread that came down from heaven. If anyone eats from this bread he will live forever. The bread that I will give for the life of the world is my flesh.”
6:52 Then the Jews who were hostile to Jesus began to argue with one another,“How can this man give us his flesh to eat?”
6:53 Jesus said to them, “I tell you the solemn truth, unless you eat the flesh of the Son of Man and drink his blood, you have no life in yourselves.
6:54 The one who eats my flesh and drinks my blood has eternal life, and I will raise him up on the last day.
6:55 For my flesh is true food, and my blood is true drink.
6:56 The one who eats my flesh and drinks my blood resides in me, and I in him.
6:57 Just as the living Father sent me, and I live because of the Father, so the one who consumes me will live because of me.
6:58 This is the bread that came down from heaven; it is not like the bread your ancestors ate, but then later died. The one who eats this bread will live forever.”
John 7:38-39 let the one who believes in me drink. Just as the scripture says, ‘From within him will flow rivers of living water.”
7:39 (Now he said this about the Spirit, whom those who believed in him were going to receive, for the Spirit had not yet been given, because Jesus was not yet glorified.)


Thank you and God bless.
your brother in Christ.

virgilio
 
Upvote 0

Rick Otto

The Dude Abides
Nov 19, 2002
34,112
7,406
On The Prairie
✟29,593.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
It's metaphor.

MET'APHOR, n. [Gr. to transfer, over, to carry.] A short similitude; a similitude reduced to a single word; or a word expressing similitude without the signs of comparison. Thus "that man is a fox," is a metaphor; but "that man is like a fox," is a similitude or comparison. So when I say, "the soldiers fought like lions," I use a similitude. In metaphor, the similitude is contained in the name; a man is a fox, means, a man is as crafty as a fox. So we say, a man bridles his anger, that is, restrains it as a bridle restrains a horse. Beauty awakens love or tender passions; opposition fires courage.
Browse 1828 => Word METAPHOR :: Search the 1828 Noah Webster's Dictionary of the English Language (FREE) :: 1828.mshaffer.com
 
Upvote 0

CaliforniaJosiah

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Aug 6, 2005
17,496
1,568
✟229,195.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Lutheran
Marital Status
Private
Politics
US-Republican
Hi California Josiah, greetings,

Typically, in hermeneutics, we accept what is said as what is meant unless there is something textually to indicate a "figure of speech" is being used. IMO

I would like to pursue the option of figurative speech that Jesus do when he preach in John 6:50-58 and John 7:38-39. It is needless to say that we have literal food to sustain our physical growth and health and we also need spiritual food for enhancement and regeneration of our spirit.

We clothed ourselves with fine clothing that fitted our taste and fashion and we must also have the spiritual raiment to cover our spiritual nakedness which means lack of knowledge about God. Herewith is figurative speech of Jesus which we cannot took literally:

John 6:27 Do not work for the food that disappears, but for the food that remains to eternal life – the food which the Son of Man will give to you. For God the Father has put his seal of approval on him.”

John 6:50-58 This is the bread that has come down from heaven, so that a person may eat from it and not die.
6:51 I am the living bread that came down from heaven. If anyone eats from this bread he will live forever. The bread that I will give for the life of the world is my flesh.”
6:52 Then the Jews who were hostile to Jesus began to argue with one another,“How can this man give us his flesh to eat?”
6:53 Jesus said to them, “I tell you the solemn truth, unless you eat the flesh of the Son of Man and drink his blood, you have no life in yourselves.
6:54 The one who eats my flesh and drinks my blood has eternal life, and I will raise him up on the last day.
6:55 For my flesh is true food, and my blood is true drink.
6:56 The one who eats my flesh and drinks my blood resides in me, and I in him.
6:57 Just as the living Father sent me, and I live because of the Father, so the one who consumes me will live because of me.
6:58 This is the bread that came down from heaven; it is not like the bread your ancestors ate, but then later died. The one who eats this bread will live forever.”
John 7:38-39 let the one who believes in me drink. Just as the scripture says, ‘From within him will flow rivers of living water
7:39 (Now he said this about the Spirit, whom those who believed in him were going to receive, for the Spirit had not yet been given, because Jesus was not yet glorified.)


Thank you and God bless.
your brother in Christ.

virgilio

I quite agree with you. But then John 6 and 7 are not about the Eucharist, they are never even mentioned in the opening post.


Thank you!


Pax


- Josiah



.





.
 
Upvote 0

virgilio

Newbie
Aug 21, 2011
975
63
✟23,951.00
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
I quite agree with you. But then John 6 and 7 are not about the Eucharist, they are never even mentioned in the opening post.

Thank you!

Pax

- Josiah
Hi California Josiah greetings,
Thank you for giving me some attention in answering my post.

Peace and Grace be with you.:wave:
Thank you very much.
your brother in Christ.
virgilio


.
 
Upvote 0

MarkRohfrietsch

Unapologetic Apologist
Site Supporter
Dec 8, 2007
30,981
5,810
✟1,008,144.00
Country
Canada
Gender
Male
Faith
Lutheran
Marital Status
Married
It's metaphor.

MET'APHOR, n. [Gr. to transfer, over, to carry.] A short similitude; a similitude reduced to a single word; or a word expressing similitude without the signs of comparison. Thus "that man is a fox," is a metaphor; but "that man is like a fox," is a similitude or comparison. So when I say, "the soldiers fought like lions," I use a similitude. In metaphor, the similitude is contained in the name; a man is a fox, means, a man is as crafty as a fox. So we say, a man bridles his anger, that is, restrains it as a bridle restrains a horse. Beauty awakens love or tender passions; opposition fires courage.
Browse 1828 => Word METAPHOR :: Search the 1828 Noah Webster's Dictionary of the English Language (FREE) :: 1828.mshaffer.com

Sorry, but this proves nothing.
 
Upvote 0
B

bbbbbbb

Guest
We Zwinglians are consistent in our hermeneutic concerning the bread and wine. When Jesus took the bread and said, "Take eat, this is my body which is broken for you." the bread did not become his body in any physical sense or "spiritual" sense, however that word might be defined. He used a metaphor which would have been clearly understood by the disciples and, indeed, is understood in the Jewish Passover seder. The bread symbolizes the physical body of Jesus even as the wine symbolizes the physical blood of Jesus. All Christian agree on the symbolic understanding of the bread and the wine but some have chosen to add additional meanings to them which were never intended by our Lord.
 
Upvote 0

simonthezealot

have you not read,what God has spoken unto you?
Apr 17, 2006
16,461
1,919
Minnesota
✟27,453.00
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
We Zwinglians are consistent in our hermeneutic concerning the bread and wine. When Jesus took the bread and said, "Take eat, this is my body which is broken for you." the bread did not become his body in any physical sense or "spiritual" sense, however that word might be defined. He used a metaphor which would have been clearly understood by the disciples and, indeed, is understood in the Jewish Passover seder. The bread symbolizes the physical body of Jesus even as the wine symbolizes the physical blood of Jesus. All Christian agree on the symbolic understanding of the bread and the wine but some have chosen to add additional meanings to them which were never intended by our Lord.
Guess that makes me a Zwinglian as well.
 
Upvote 0