- Jan 21, 2005
- 451
- 51
- 42
- Faith
- Christian
- Marital Status
- Married
- Politics
- US-Republican
Hello everyone.
I have been doing a word study lately on "baptism," and it came up in a discussion on one of the verses the supposed warning that the end of Mark may not belong in the Bible.
My NIV translation makes a note saying, "The earliest manuscripts and some other ancient witnesses do not have Mark 16:9-20."
I just wondered if anyone knew some background on these verses, and could present the arguments for and against the end of this gospel. We were just curious.
I have been doing a word study lately on "baptism," and it came up in a discussion on one of the verses the supposed warning that the end of Mark may not belong in the Bible.
My NIV translation makes a note saying, "The earliest manuscripts and some other ancient witnesses do not have Mark 16:9-20."
I just wondered if anyone knew some background on these verses, and could present the arguments for and against the end of this gospel. We were just curious.