- Jun 18, 2006
- 3,856,192
- 52,657
- Country
- United States
- Gender
- Male
- Faith
- Baptist
- Marital Status
- Married
- Politics
- US-Republican
Upvote
0
Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
Of course there's polar ice, far more extensly
studied and cross checked.
There are a number of hilariously inane
"explanations' for the depth and age of the uce.
The enemy of my enemy is my friend.Why do you cite Hovind when his arguments don't match up with yours? He doesn't subscribe to the whole 'embedded age' thing, for one. He thinks (or claims to think) the physical evidence actually supports a young earth, which is something that you're on the record as denying.
The enemy of my enemy is my friend.
It's what he is tearing down; not what he is building up.
(Besides, he's my brother-in-Christ, just like you are.)
Just remember who it was who decided there even existed a so-called 'enemy' .. (and the source of that decision)!The enemy of my enemy is my friend.
Sorry ... I should have made it clearer.In that case, you should be citing my theistic evolution arguments...
Just remember who it was who decided there even existed a so-called 'enemy' .. (and the source of that decision)!
Care to fill out the Nicolas Bourbaki anti-intellectual checksheet?Sorry ... I should have made it clearer.
Evolution is the enemy; young earth creationism is the friend.
In fact, my pastor is a young earth creationist.
I scored a 9.Care to fill out the Nicolas Bourbaki anti-intellectual checksheet?
Gobsmackingly anti-intellectual .. (and yet somehow twistedly proud of it)?I scored a 9
Eyes barn ignit, eyes die ignit.Gobsmackingly anti-intellectual .. (and yet somehow twistedly proud of it)?
Velcro.SelfSim said:(All I can wonder is how you manage to do up your shoelaces ..?)
Sorry ... I should have made it clearer.
Evolution is the enemy; young earth creationism is the friend.
In fact, my pastor is a young earth creationist.
Would you (et alii) please dispense with the phrase THE APPEARANCE OF AGE and use what it is: AGE.On topic, it seems to me that if God created the Earth and universe with the appearance of age, one can hardly blame scientists for estimating the age to be billions of years rather than 6,000.
Would you (et alii) please dispense with the phrase THE APPEARANCE OF AGE and use what it is: AGE.
There's a difference.
God created the universe with age ... and ... God created the universe with [the appearance of] age can be misconstrued.
The universe appears old, because the universe is old.
You're a gentleman and a scholar!Oops. Sorry. Fixed.
I scored a 9.
How did you score?
Easier to just say "planned it all along"
So no bird nor other creature ate seeds, nuts, fruit until
after the "fall".
So, as the purpose of fruit and berries is to get animals
to eat them and spread the seeds, the fall had to happen
pretty soon, to get seed distribution going.
Giant squids used their tentacles to reach out of the water
for tufts of grass. Spidrrs ate grass.
Strange.
They ate plants, fruit and seeds from creation.
After the fall some animals ate meat.
After the flood man was allowed allowed meat.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?