Hi there,
The difference between separation anxiety and the death penalty, is actually nothing to do with: psychology, psychiatry, or the appointment of an executioner.
As such, even attempts to associate these three in any context: can not be considered, "work" or anything related.
If you said for example, "I know what I haven't done: I haven't predicted that someone else should have mated at the same time, I had a choice God didn't give me because of England having ruled the country" - even when having committed a sin, worthy of the death penalty - - actually you would be attempting to use psychology, to change something considered known to be the extra mile ("as if not having changed anything"), as though any attempt to say "the" executioner is "the executioner, who was not recognized" means that: the crime itself ____ is ____ ____ disqualified ____ ____ ____.
As such the presumption of work, is completely "_____".
(And no work that could have been done without Christ, was done without Christ, having been Christ, without work or "work having worked").
_
In some sense, this has meant the problem, of defining a principle without point, as though law, which disqualifies the individual's expectation of justice ____ is a worse crime (than attempts to say, I have deserved a principle on the basis of a point, until such time, as you can write, in principle "you were principled, and duly assertive or "affirmative" to a point (which remained "pointed")).
_
There is in fact, no way to arrest someone, who fulfils the law of love.
In context with arousal, for example, it is in fact the man's duty in innocence, to lose a desire, within 37 seconds ____ should the appearance of such anywhere ____ ____ have ____ ____ ____ ____ (as his parents have told him is "impossible" to have "kept ____ honouring ____ ____" ____ ____ ____).
+
_
+
In Christ, this difference, is an arrest in spirit, and spirit only ____ on the basis of the law ____ being fulfilled ____ ____ for all time: when despite making the assumption of acknowledged word and difference ____ yet the law of such within the heart ____ ____ neither acknowledges loosing and binding, nor treading, nor ____ the evil one ____ ____.
The difference between separation anxiety and the death penalty, is actually nothing to do with: psychology, psychiatry, or the appointment of an executioner.
As such, even attempts to associate these three in any context: can not be considered, "work" or anything related.
If you said for example, "I know what I haven't done: I haven't predicted that someone else should have mated at the same time, I had a choice God didn't give me because of England having ruled the country" - even when having committed a sin, worthy of the death penalty - - actually you would be attempting to use psychology, to change something considered known to be the extra mile ("as if not having changed anything"), as though any attempt to say "the" executioner is "the executioner, who was not recognized" means that: the crime itself ____ is ____ ____ disqualified ____ ____ ____.
As such the presumption of work, is completely "_____".
(And no work that could have been done without Christ, was done without Christ, having been Christ, without work or "work having worked").
_
In some sense, this has meant the problem, of defining a principle without point, as though law, which disqualifies the individual's expectation of justice ____ is a worse crime (than attempts to say, I have deserved a principle on the basis of a point, until such time, as you can write, in principle "you were principled, and duly assertive or "affirmative" to a point (which remained "pointed")).
_
There is in fact, no way to arrest someone, who fulfils the law of love.
In context with arousal, for example, it is in fact the man's duty in innocence, to lose a desire, within 37 seconds ____ should the appearance of such anywhere ____ ____ have ____ ____ ____ ____ (as his parents have told him is "impossible" to have "kept ____ honouring ____ ____" ____ ____ ____).
+
_
+
In Christ, this difference, is an arrest in spirit, and spirit only ____ on the basis of the law ____ being fulfilled ____ ____ for all time: when despite making the assumption of acknowledged word and difference ____ yet the law of such within the heart ____ ____ neither acknowledges loosing and binding, nor treading, nor ____ the evil one ____ ____.
