Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
Late_Cretaceous said:Back to the Good Samaritan. If that story would be taken literally, how would you ever be able to use it as a metaphor for everyday life?
Think about it.
It says the earth was created in 6 days in the 10 commandments? That's nearly as faulty as your geneology, which somehow ignored the book of Matthew.Ark Guy said:Did you ever read the 10 commandments...it says it there. Go check it out.
Bushido216 said:Oh.
In that case I wouldn't take it literally. Our body parts aren't autonomous from the rest of the brain, the brain controls our body.
So if we sin, we ought to cut out our brains, but that'd be suicide, which is against the Bible.
So I guess we're in a Catch22.
Or maybe [Jesus] meant that whatever impulses cause us to sin should be stemmed.
God knew they existed. He gave them procedure 3,000 years before science knew they existed.wblastyn said:Yes, but they did not actually know microbes existed. So if they didn't have the knowledge of our basic biological science how could they have understood evolution. People today don't even understand evolution.
Lewis, you miss the point I'm trying to spell out here, but perhaps I could do a better job answering your question...please let me know if I do not.LewisWildermuth said:Buck72, there is no mention of semiconductor theory in the Bible either. But yet here we are typing on computers that run because of semiconductor theory, should we walk away from the computer because the basics that allow it to operate are not mentioned in the Bible?
What about germ theory? should we never see a doctor since it is not mentioned in the Bible?
Thanks for the suggestion, Ark Guy.Ark Guy said:My suggestion is that you study that passage a bit more.
I have already addressed this; ad nauseum.Bushido216 said:Empty rhetoric.
If you go by your "if it's not in the Bible, it doesn't exist", theory, then evolutionsts could say "if our theory doesn't mention God, he doesn't exist".
The Bible clearly says that the method for Creation was the WORD. John 1 explains this method in its entirety, absolutely in harmony with Gen 1 to the astounding point that the 'Word was God and became flesh'.We simply look at evolution as a method for God's working.
I have referred to the Mosaic Law outlined in the Book of Leviticus that gave specific procedure to washing after contact with the sick and dead; the "unclean". Microbial infections, and communicable disease were not as clearly understood as they are today, but the Hebrews knew that by following the cleansing instructions of the Law they would counter the spreading of germs. I've already stated that medical science didn't figure that one out for nearly 3,000 years, which is why there were so many deaths in hospitals in the mid-1800's. The washing of the hands and clothes under "running water": Leviticus 15:13. Doctors up until the 1800's used stagnant basins which became fouled with blood and all sorts of who-knows-what. See the reference in Encycolpedia Brittanica under: Dr Ignaz Semmelweis, Vienna, 1845And you said that God provided man with processes. What processes? Cite scripture please.
Because your scripture has nothing to do with the topic at hand.Buck72 said:I have already addressed this; ad nauseum.
I also have been quoting scripture like mad...you have answered me by calling me "nuts", "Orwellian", and using "empty rhetoric", not to mention the strawman conspiracy. I'm just quoting the Bible bro.
Can a God fearing, bible believing, spiritually dogmatic, young earth creationist jump in or is this discussion private?Bushido216 said:No.
It's because Genesis says that God created Adam and Eve, who had Cain and Abel. Abel was killed by Cain. Cain then had children with his wife.
Okay, am I the only who sees something wrong with that?
What we know of God comes from scripture, not other men's fanciful imaginations whether it be creationism or evolution. Very presumptous indeed I would say that you would use Dr. Dino as a representative and a spokesman for all creationist - forgetting that foremost he represents himself.Vance said:Other's, like Hovind, have become so enamored with "pleasing men" (as you quote from Galations) that he will say ANYTHING that his given audience (the Creationist congregations) wants to hear (and that will sell more books and tapes).
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?