Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
Appointed death? Where do you get that idea? What do you make of Romans 5:12 which states that death came through sin? What is your basis for putting death before sin?Jesus' death doesn't atone for the appointed death of all that are mortal (flesh and blood) but for the eternal death penalty that results from unrepented sin.
Appointed death? Where do you get that idea? What do you make of Romans 5:12 which states that death came through sin? What is your basis for putting death before sin?
Theologically the creation story has to be taken at face value. If there is death before sin, then Jesus' death does not accomplish the stated end of conquering death through atonement for sin because sin is not the cause of death. And so we cannot accept a paradigm in which sin is not directly responsible for death. Now, we may propose alternative understandings of reality in which there is not such a naive correspondence which complicates the whole matter and rectifies this discrepancy between theories of science and theological imperatives so that does not mean we have to take it as actual history though it seems to me such a process would be more about appeasing enlightenment sensibilities than dealing with the implications.
Every person who has "dated" creation has come up with a different date.If you step away from the literal reading, do you enter a place where any interpretation is valid? I was raised in a church that taught that it was literal. (the "days" and the "begats") Outside the literal reading, I am at a loss to know what to make of it. Not sure if I want to get on that boat - lol
The creation story: (Genesis)
- Was the universe created in six literal days?
- Was Adam the first human, a created being?
- Was Adam created in the image of God, after his likeness? (appearance)
- Is the Genesis account literal, or figurative?
- Was the Genesis account based on an oral tradition? (origins myth)
- In reference to Adam, is the conclusion of the genealogy of Jesus correct? (see below)
Luke 3:38 NIV
the son of Enosh, the son of Seth, the son of Adam, the son of God.
Sounds like an interesting concept for a "dating" app. - lolEvery person who has "dated" creation has come up with a different date.
This proves that the "begats" were not intended to date anything.
I would be curious to hear your figurative view of the Genesis account.- It is possible but I don't know.
- Yes.
- Probably, but Image may not refer to appearance. But considering the Incarnation I think probably. For it says "you were created in Christ Jesus," which is a term for the Incarnate Lord. I do not think time is just linear. But this makes a chicken-and-egg scenario, so I don't know.
- Yes (that is, both).
- Yes.
- Yes.
The Bible teaches that it was a literal 6 days, despite many not accepting that it is presented as literal, even by God himself.
This is God speaking:
Exodus 20:8-11
The creation story: (Genesis)
- Was the universe created in six literal days?
- Was Adam the first human, a created being?
- Was Adam created in the image of God, after his likeness? (appearance)
- Is the Genesis account literal, or figurative?
- Was the Genesis account based on an oral tradition? (origins myth)
- In reference to Adam, is the conclusion of the genealogy of Jesus correct? (see below)
Luke 3:38 NIV
the son of Enosh, the son of Seth, the son of Adam, the son of God.
Well, that's a rather curious thing for God to say.He says when someone can be perfect by their own strength, then they will be qualified to know how He does everything.
So, are you saying that you understand Genesis, or that it is folly to try?Exodus 20:8-11 God said He did make it in six literal days, and Adam was the first man. You will note that of course over the many years of Adam and Eve’s life outside the garden, but inside the greater Eden area they would have had many children that would intermarry.
....
I would note that God is all powerful.
Imagine that imbalance when placed next to us, and we are trying to figure out how He did something; it is folly. ...
Someone asked earlier if we are calling God a liar if we don't accept the Genesis account as literal. Well, no. But we are asking for some clarification about all the factors that don't add up. If we dare to question it. Somehow I think God can handle a few questions. But not according to the end of Job, apparently. See post #629 second paragraph. (quoted below) God as prickly pear.We probably won't ever understand 'creation week' from the biblical account alone.
I am new to this forum, and have never been on one before. Thank you for commenting on my post despite the many flaws with it. I am not sure I can satisfy the question though.My statement not looking at Job was not helpful. The relevant passages are quoted below showing the inadequacy of my earlier quote. I would uphold that we are like those of Job 38:2 also darkening His counsel with words without knowledge. Quotes of God responding to Job below:Well, that's a rather curious thing for God to say.
Imagine going to an art fair and asking someone how they did their work.
And then you get what is said in your quote above.
If it's not okay for a human to talk that way, why is it okay for God?
Does he live at a lower moral standard then we do?
There are some straightforward problems with the text that don't require a degree in rocket science to discuss. Conflicts between the accounts in chapter one and two. And problems in each account by itself. This video points out the problems, How do you respond?Regarding the question asking if I understand Genesis 1, I would say I do not comprehend the details of Genesis one, I accept them. I have things I think, but, again, I cannot know; I was not there. I think AnswersInGenesis.com gives many scientific resources regarding the faults of the ways we have tried to make earth old, and evolution the method of creation’s start, and progression.
There are some straightforward problems with the text that don't require a degree in rocket science to discuss. Conflicts between the accounts in chapter one and two. And problems in each account by itself. This video points out the problems, How do you respond?
Joel Baden (Professor of Hebrew Bible Yale University) spoke at the 2013 Nantucket Project. Nearly 80 percent of all Americans think the Bible is either literally true or is the inspired word of God. And yet, most Americans have no idea what is actually in the Bible. So we have the paradoxical situation in which we as a culture "have invested the words of this book with amazing authority even when we don't know what these words are and what they mean."
There are some straightforward problems with the text that don't require a degree in rocket science to discuss. Conflicts between the accounts in chapter one and two. And problems in each account by itself. This video points out the problems, How do you respond?
Joel Baden (Professor of Hebrew Bible Yale University) spoke at the 2013 Nantucket Project. Nearly 80 percent of all Americans think the Bible is either literally true or is the inspired word of God. And yet, most Americans have no idea what is actually in the Bible. So we have the paradoxical situation in which we as a culture "have invested the words of this book with amazing authority even when we don't know what these words are and what they mean."
Joel Baden (Professor of Hebrew Bible Yale University) spoke at the 2013 Nantucket Project. Nearly 80 percent of all Americans think the Bible is either literally true or is the inspired word of God. And yet, most Americans have no idea what is actually in the Bible. So we have the paradoxical situation in which we as a culture "have invested the words of this book with amazing authority even when we don't know what these words are and what they mean."
- In reference to Adam, is the conclusion of the genealogy of Jesus correct? (see below)
Fair point, though then what do we make Romans 6 declaration that we are delivered by entering into His death? Was His death a spiritual death, or a physical death? If a physical death, then how did that serve to meet the demand if the death demanded by sin was spiritual death?Hebrews 9:27
And as it is appointed unto men once to die, but after this the judgment:
At birth we are each appointed eventual physical death. This death is reserved for each of us whether we are sinners or saints. Recall that the judgment comes after physical death not before. Therefore the judgment concerns eternity, the second death.
- Revelation 2:11
He that hath an ear, let him hear what the Spirit saith unto the churches; He that overcometh shall not be hurt of the second death.
- Revelation 20:6
Blessed and holy is he that hath part in the first resurrection: on such the second death hath no power, but they shall be priests of God and of Christ, and shall reign with him a thousand years.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?