• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

The "Church Fathers" Scriptural or Not

Amo2

Active Member
Feb 3, 2024
342
83
64
Campobello
✟25,112.00
Country
United States
Faith
SDA
Marital Status
Married
The next several posts are reposts from another thread, so as to create this new topic, and not highjack the one these few posts are taken from. To be enlarged upon by further examination of the writings of the "Church Fathers" in continued posts, and of course any conversation and input such might stimulate along the way.


The above quote is one of the reasons I consider the writings of the “Church Fathers” to be inferior to holy scripture. This early on, Clement is already introducing pagan mythology into the mix, to be considered regarding the resurrection of our Lord Jesus Christ and his faithful followers.

Phoenix | Egyptian, Greek & Roman | Britannica

Quoted article below from link above.


So, here we have in the writings of Clement, the introduction of pagan sun worshiping mythology. A trend that would only increase over time unto the formation of the first mandated form of “Christianity” for the Roman Empire. One heavily influenced and established by professed converted sun worshipping Emperors, and a mass of pagan sun worshippers brought into the “Church” via imperial mandate over and above gospel believing conversion.
 
Last edited:

Amo2

Active Member
Feb 3, 2024
342
83
64
Campobello
✟25,112.00
Country
United States
Faith
SDA
Marital Status
Married
Having just finished reading Clement of Rome, apart from his reference to the Phoenix, the work seems to be very biblically based. Somewhat generic though, in that it did not address any of the specifics of the contentions it was addressing. Focussed upon salvation in Christ alone, our High Priest. The importance of faith, right living, the commandments of God and Jesus, and unity of course. As the holy scriptures admonish us to keep the commandments of God, without any reference to the changing of the fourth commandment, so also does this address by Clement. Unless of course a contention regarding such a change was one of the issues he was addressing, which we do not know. Seems like there would have been some debate about such a change, if it were occurring at the time. So probably not. I suppose I will move on to the Epistle of Mathetes to Diognetus next.
 
Reactions: DragonFox91
Upvote 0

Fervent

Well-Known Member
Sep 22, 2020
6,729
2,938
45
San jacinto
✟208,660.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
I don't think either Orthodox or Catholics teach that any individual Church Father's writing is on par with Scripture, it is the consensus patronum as a whole that is of central importance. And even that is as a means of clarifying Scripture rather than being its equivolent.
 
Upvote 0

Amo2

Active Member
Feb 3, 2024
342
83
64
Campobello
✟25,112.00
Country
United States
Faith
SDA
Marital Status
Married
And that is of course a good thing. Any contentions therefore, would be regarding disagreements regarding these clarifications, being actually based upon the more authoritative teachings of scripture or not. Which of course will involve the differing teachings regarding just exactly what scripture itself teaches. Should be interesting regarding perhaps the development of differing views, if nothing else.
 
Upvote 0

Fervent

Well-Known Member
Sep 22, 2020
6,729
2,938
45
San jacinto
✟208,660.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Yes, though it's worth noting that the Orthodox view of tradition is as the Holy Spirit acting in the life of the Church so if there is an issue that has received an authoritative position, such as a council definition or official anathema, there's no room for debate. But then there's a fair amount of latitude because there has always been a high bar for establishing such things.

As for Scripture itself, it is the cornerstone of Tradition and the central normative element. The main opposition to sola scriptura is its reductionist tendency since the slogan doesn't allow for nuance and concordant opinions.
 
Upvote 0

Amo2

Active Member
Feb 3, 2024
342
83
64
Campobello
✟25,112.00
Country
United States
Faith
SDA
Marital Status
Married

In the above quoted portions of THE EPISTLE OF MATHETES TO DIOGNETUS, we begin to see greater departure, or shall we say deviation from the testimony of holy scripture. In an attempt it appears, to distance “Christianity” from the Jews and apparently the teachings of the Old Testament. In the very first chapter referring to “the superstitions of the Jews”, and alluding to “Christianity” as a new religion, rather than the New Covenant era of the most ancient and true religion or message on earth. The everlasting gospel of Jesus Christ.

In the second chapter we see that Mathetes does not consider all Jewish or Old Testament teaching as superstition, since his stance upon idols is most obviously identical to that of the Jews and Old Testament teaching. Particularly in line with that of the first and second commandments of God. These commandments in any case, he has not ditched into the category of superstition. Nevertheless, declaring anything the Jews believed by commandment and or teaching of God within holy scripture to have become superstition during the New covenant era, is gross error. Our God is not, has never been, and will not ever be the creator or propagator of superstitions.

Chapter three misses and excellent opportunity to address the changes from Old Covenant to New Covenant teaching and practice regarding the sacrificial system. That of the Old Covenant being fulfilled by the once and for all sacrifice of the New Covenant in Christ Jesus our Lord. And the spiritual sacrifice of the saved themselves, in response to the gospel, during this New Covenant era.


Nothing about the Israelites sacrificial system had anything to do with superstition, but rather the revelation of the everlasting gospel in type and symbol until the antitype appeared. The Lamb of God, Christ Jesus our Lord. The fulfillment of biblical prophecy which each and every sacrifice was intended to represent and foretell. These teachings and practices of the Old Covenant did not turn into superstition by the establishment of the New Covenant. Rather it became fulfilled prophecy which still had great depth of meaning and revelation concerning the gospel. Providing excellent opportunity for instruction concerning the continuity of the everlasting gospel throughout our earth’s history. God’s people of the Old Covenant having exercised prophetic faith in the forgiveness of their sins by the sacrifice of the LAMB OF GOD, the Messiah of the Jews. And those of the New Covenant accepting the reality of that sacrifice for them, in the life, crucifixion, and resurrection of Christ Jesus our Lord.

Chapter four becomes more specific in addressing what Mathetes deems to be superstition. Which includes teaching and practices concerning meats, Sabbaths, circumcision, new moons, observation of months and days, some for festivities and others for mourning. Referring to these Old covenant teachings and observances as not just superstition, but actual folly concerning authentic worship. All of these which were commanded to be observed by the very God Mathetes claimed to worship. As though God Himself instituted worthless, superstitious, folly to be observed by the people He Himself chose for a nation to be a witness among all the other nations of this earth. Perhaps Mathetes will expound upon the subject later in more depth, to the proper effect of the real folly concerning all such. In that they were never meant to be the means of salvation which so many of Israel often made them. Nor of course in many cases, meant to be observed by the multitudes of the saved from other nations during the New Covenant dispensation.

Nevertheless, these commanded teachings and observances established by God Himself for Israel never were and or will be mere worthless superstitions or folly. They had exact purpose, intent, value, and lessons of importance for those of the Old Covenant era, none of which has disappeared in this New Covenant era. The lessons and purposes are still there to be studied unto increased knowledge of God’s guidance and providence for His people throughout history. As the New Testament writers themsleves expounded upon, rightly dividing the word of God under the inspiration of the Holy Spirit of God. As the Old Covenant prophets did as well. There is no folly at all in the teachings and observances of the Old Covenant, but by sinful humanity itself in attributing such to the cause of their salvation. Instead of observing that which God commanded and or commands because of their salvation in Him alone. Which very problem exists to this very day, among professed Christianity. Being a natural inclination of our fallen natures, which must always be guarded against.

It is interesting to note that Mathetes makes a distinction between the Sabbaths of the “Jews” which he refers to as superstitions, and the weekly Sabbath day or days of the fourth commandment, which he apparently did not consider to be part of such superstitions. The Lightfoot & Harmer translation translates Mathetes reference to the Sabbaths which it is lawful to do good upon, as sabbath day, not days.

(from: _Apostolic Fathers_ Lightfoot & Harmer, 1891 translation)
4:3 And again to lie against God, as if He forbad us to do any good thing on the sabbath day, is not this profane?

Which testimony is itself a direct reference to the teachings of our Lord Jesus Christ concerning God’s weekly seventh day sabbath established at creation by His word , spoken by the mouth of God and written with His own finger for his chosen people twice among His Ten Commandments. Not the other sabbaths specific to the ceremony, holidays, and or agriculture of the nation of Israel. Those of the law written for them by the hand of Moses.


If in fact God’s seventh day Sabbath had been done away with by the early church, and replaced with a Sunday observance based upon the resurrection, these first two “Church Fathers” under examination address no such thing. Though many might choose to associate Mathetes reference to sabbaths of the Jews being among supposed superstitions which God Himself apparently instituted. His later reference to God’s weekly seventh day Sabbath is problematic to such an idea though. In that he references our Lord’s teaching regarding it, and the mistake which many Jews made in relation to it, without taking any opportunity to address any major changes concerning it. Even though changes and differences between the Jews and Christians was the exact context being discussed. In this Epistle exactly addressing the teachings of the early church, and its differences from the teachings and observances of the Jews.

If indeed Mathetes had already discontinued his observance of God’s seventh day Sabbath, and firmly believed its observance to have been replaced by Sunday observance as the “Lord’s day” in honor of the resurrection, it makes no sense for him to not address such. Neither in this Epistle at all, or even when the Sabbath itself was the exact topic being discussed, regarding the “mode of worshipping God prevalent among the Christians” in his day. Mathetes stated entire reason for this Epistle.
 
Reactions: Felipe Sommer
Upvote 0

Amo2

Active Member
Feb 3, 2024
342
83
64
Campobello
✟25,112.00
Country
United States
Faith
SDA
Marital Status
Married

The only observation I’ll make concerning Mathetes chapter 5, is to point out his comment concerning Christinas not having any particular singularity. After which he continues on to list more than just a few. Nevertheless apparently, he still feels no need to point out the new establishment of the observance of the “Lord’s Day”, in honor of Christ’s resurrection. Which would certainly qualify as a singularity among Christians of the time, had it been doctrinally established already. This may have helped clear up certain accused connections between sun worshipers and Christians which developed. At least as Trypho accused and or contended in the Dialogue with Trypho, of Justin Martyr I do believe.

Apart from this, there is the scriptural teaching of course -


While it is not the object of authentic Christianity to seek worldly recognition, neither is its purpose to blend into and disappear within societies or nations. But to the contrary, be different enough from the norms of this world, to be unavoidably noticed. Not unto self recognition or praise, but rather direction toward the exaltation of the One we worship, and the salvation of those who would look upon Him.
 
Upvote 0

Amo2

Active Member
Feb 3, 2024
342
83
64
Campobello
✟25,112.00
Country
United States
Faith
SDA
Marital Status
Married

In this sixth chapter of Mathetes we have the introduction of yet another ancient pagan concept and term. The immortal soul, or immortality of the soul. This term and or concept is found nowhere in holy scripture at all. To the contrary, souls are referred to as dying many times over in the scriptures.

Gen 2:7 And the LORD God formed man of the dust of the ground, and breathed into his nostrils the breath of life; and man became a living soul.

When God united His breath, or spirit with man, man became a living soul. A living soul is composed of body and spirit.

05397 hmvn n@shamah nesh-aw-maw'

from 05395; n f; {See TWOT on 1433 @@ '1433a'}

AV-breath 17, blast 3, spirit 2, inspiration 1, souls 1; 24

1) breath, spirit

1a) breath (of God)

1b) breath (of man)

1c) every breathing thing

1d) spirit (of man)

When one dies, their spirit goes back to God who gave it, at which point, one is no longer a living soul. This is why humanity is not immortal, and must receive the same from God as a gift of salvation. Souls need to be saved, can be lost, can be destroyed, can and do die, and are described in connection with the body as being subject to literal damage as the body is.


According to scripture then, souls can and do die. The souls of humans and animals do die. Souls therefore, are not immortal.
 
Reactions: Felipe Sommer
Upvote 0

Amo2

Active Member
Feb 3, 2024
342
83
64
Campobello
✟25,112.00
Country
United States
Faith
SDA
Marital Status
Married

From the above we may ascertain, that imperial mandated “Christianity”, was not yet conceived or considered acceptable at the time. If it was, this document thus far, gives the idea no credence. Still maintaining and practicing the teaching and example of our Lord Jesus Christ and His chosen Apostles. Amen.
 
Reactions: DragonFox91
Upvote 0

Amo2

Active Member
Feb 3, 2024
342
83
64
Campobello
✟25,112.00
Country
United States
Faith
SDA
Marital Status
Married

What can be said about the above testimony? It completely bypasses the entire recorded history of the Old Testament. Which was exactly about revealing and maintaining a knowledge of God in this world, and His great mercy towards His chosen people and all of humanity thereby as well. While also maintaining the high divine standards of morality and justice. Once again, not only missing an excellent opportunity to reveal the most ancient nature and continuation of God’s mercy and everlasting covenant with all of willing humanity throughout our history, but seeming to suggest there was no such thing.

Perhaps the writer thought to express sentiments related by the Apostle Paul in the following -


None of these statements by Paul though, were in neglect and or denial of the history of divine revelation between God and humanity. Or certainly, that of divine revelation to His chosen people Israel via Moses and all the prophets. Which thus far, this writer has either ignored or relinquished to the realms of superstition or folly, while supposedly expounding upon authentic Christianity. Which is the New Covenant era of the everlasting covenant and gospel, established in the Garden of Eden immediately after the fall of humanity for our salvation. Continuing from that time forward to the present by way of special revelation from God, through His chosen people concerning the entire history of this world to its end. The only original, true, and authentically God revealed religion of this world.

Perhaps the author will address this most important point later.
 
Upvote 0

Amo2

Active Member
Feb 3, 2024
342
83
64
Campobello
✟25,112.00
Country
United States
Faith
SDA
Marital Status
Married

While the above chapter does address or reference teachings apparently, from former times which convinced us “that our nature was unable to attain to life”, it leaves Old covenant and or testament teaching out of the picture. Therefore also of course, the history of Israel and or reference to the Jews. Further evidence that this claimed church father, is intent upon the task of distancing himself and or the church from the Jews, in his epistle under examination. Though we have a few more chapters from which he might change this seemingly apparent motive up to this point.

Apart from this, I would address only the term applied by the writer concerning the covering of our sins by Christ’s righteousness. The everlasting gospel of Jesus Christ established in the testimonies of both the Old and New testament scriptures, are not about our sins being covered by the Savior, but rather thoroughly cleansed and washed away. As in they are no more. This by our Lord and Savior among the believing, and willingly submissive followers of His way of the cross.

 
Upvote 0

Amo2

Active Member
Feb 3, 2024
342
83
64
Campobello
✟25,112.00
Country
United States
Faith
SDA
Marital Status
Married

Mathetes once again refers to a knowledge to be gained regarding several things taught and revealed in the Old Testament, without mentioning it or the people He used to preserve its place in this world, of course. To be fair though, he does not make much use of reference to either Old or New Testament holy scripture.

Interestingly, he refers to eternal fire, in connection with the end of those committed to it. As though, even though earlier he referred to the soul as immortal, he is not necessarily convinced of or adheres to any doctrine concerning eternal punishment in hell. Not that any actual doctrine concerning the subject can be deduced to have been believed or taught by him, according to this one somewhat vague statement. A more direct statement or address would be necessary to establish such.
 
Upvote 0

Amo2

Active Member
Feb 3, 2024
342
83
64
Campobello
✟25,112.00
Country
United States
Faith
SDA
Marital Status
Married

Once again, while making honorable mention of the Father, the Word, His disciples, Apostles, prophets, gospels, teachings, tradition, the law, and grace, Mathetes quotes no scripture or even suggests an examination of them in order to understand what Christians of his day believe and or practice. No reference to the Old Testament of course, as he relinquished much of them to the rank of superstition and or folly, and no quotes from and or advice to examine any of the writings of the Apostles which should have been prevalent at the time. Perhaps as a declared teacher of the gentiles, he didn’t want to encourage the study of the actual words of the Jews who wrote the Old testament, or the vast majority of the New Testament as well. Setting a precedence perhaps, of church tradition equal to and or above scripture itself in the near future. As traditional and ever more political “Christianity” arose to a place of more prominence in and of this world, than authentic scripturally based and evangelical Christianity. Which was ever non political, and a more conviction based and chosen faith.

 
Upvote 0

Amo2

Active Member
Feb 3, 2024
342
83
64
Campobello
✟25,112.00
Country
United States
Faith
SDA
Marital Status
Married

This last chapter seems to be as vague and or generic, as the others which preceded it. Though we finally have one short sentence of scripture quoted, it is surrounded by what I can only describe as gobbledygook, concerning apparently the tree of life and the tree of the knowledge of good and evil. Though the evil part is left out by the author. Which the author relates as though some one unfamiliar with holy scripture and the account of the fall of humanity in Genesis, would have any idea of what they were talking about.

The main problem with this Epistle as I see it, is it’s complete lack of scriptural reference, quotes, or authority. While it begins as an address to explain Christianity to one who is apparently ignorant of the same, it is void of reference to holy scripture, and or the prominent place and authority of them which is paramount to the Christian faith. As already stated, relinquishing much of the Old Testament scriptures to the ranks of superstition and folly, it never seems to attempt to establish the writings of the Apostles as authoritative either. Leaning apparently upon the authors own authority or knowledge regarding them, to be considered as such by the reader as well.

It almost seems as though it was written to one who was already very familiar with holy scripture, and therefore needed no reference to it, in order to understand where the author came up with the truths he was promulgating. Which seems to be at odds with the opening statement of the Epistle itself, to the effect that it was addressing one who did not know the “mode of worshipping God prevalent among the Christians, and inquiring very carefully and earnestly concerning them, what God they trust in, and what form of religion they observe”. In any case, the Epistle does not as I see it, properly seek to establish the significance and authority of holy scripture to or within authentic Christian faith.


Nor as already stated, does it address at all the significance of the fairly new establishment of a Sunday sacredness, which many claim was prevalent among the early Christians. While it did address sabbaths of the Jews which the author considered superstitious in nature, and the seventh day Sabbath of the Lord. This ends my examination of Mathetes. I will move on to EPISTLE OF POLYCARP TO THE PHILIPPIANS next.

 
Upvote 0

Lukaris

Orthodox Christian
Site Supporter
Aug 3, 2007
8,895
3,239
Pennsylvania, USA
✟957,108.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Eastern Orthodox
Marital Status
Single
Is it possible that Diognetes was literate, but had no scriptures to read, knew they existed, acknowledged them all the same, was an effective hearer of the Gospel preached, and did his part to be a doer as well as a hearer? ( Romans 10:17, James 1:21-26 etc.).
 
Upvote 0

DragonFox91

Well-Known Member
Dec 20, 2020
6,314
3,877
33
Grand Rapids MI
✟287,392.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Republican
--- I've thought Chapter 4 of Diognetes is a good glimpse as to how early Christians were living. They were in the world but were not part of it
--- I think his point of the Jews being superstitious was b/c they thought God needed it. He's also tying their doing it the way the pagans do it. Paganism had corrupted Judaism of that day as it had in the OT days, that's what he is saying. Then in Chapter 7 he hits it is really no mystery at all. I feel like sometimes we read Church Fathers expecting to find a bunch of odd stuff & I don't think that's always the case
--- It must be written for a different purpose, I think Diognetes had specific questions it's addressing, that's why it seems unusual
----For Clement & the phoenix, he's otherwise good & nothing unordinary
----It is good you are reading these!
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

Amo2

Active Member
Feb 3, 2024
342
83
64
Campobello
✟25,112.00
Country
United States
Faith
SDA
Marital Status
Married
There is of course a whole lot about the authors, the times, those the authors are addressing, and the exact context or circumstances their particular epistles are addressing, we cannot know. Which might perhaps change our views of what they wrote. For all we know, Mathetes was addressing someone who had requested an account of the reasons for Christian belief and practice, without a bunch of scripture being quoted. Which perhaps they had no interest in.

Which is why I will try to stick to the writings concerning whether they are scripturally based and supported or not, avoiding personal judgments of the authors reasons or motives.
 
Upvote 0

Amo2

Active Member
Feb 3, 2024
342
83
64
Campobello
✟25,112.00
Country
United States
Faith
SDA
Marital Status
Married
Anything is possible. Lucky for him and the rest of us, God will be our righteous judge pertaining to all things. Through our common Advocate, our Lord and Savior Jesus Christ.

 
Upvote 0