• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

  • CF has always been a site that welcomes people from different backgrounds and beliefs to participate in discussion and even debate. That is the nature of its ministry. In view of recent events emotions are running very high. We need to remind people of some basic principles in debating on this site. We need to be civil when we express differences in opinion. No personal attacks. Avoid you, your statements. Don't characterize an entire political party with comparisons to Fascism or Communism or other extreme movements that committed atrocities. CF is not the place for broad brush or blanket statements about groups and political parties. Put the broad brushes and blankets away when you come to CF, better yet, put them in the incinerator. Debate had no place for them. We need to remember that people that commit acts of violence represent themselves or a small extreme faction.
  • We hope the site problems here are now solved, however, if you still have any issues, please start a ticket in Contact Us

The Cause of Everything

MartinM

GondolierAce
Feb 9, 2003
4,215
258
43
Visit site
✟5,655.00
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Engaged
Jet Black said:
Lets take the very very very distant future. There is only a single atom left (probably iron or hydrogen), all the others having spontaneously tunneled in on themselves and then evaporated into hawking radiation. Then this final atom tunnels in on itself and evaporates into hawking radiation. At that moment, time no longer holds any relevance whatsoever, since radiation does not have a rest frame, and sees no time. what of temporality now?

Not sure what you're getting at here. Time and causality, in the GR sense, can still be defined in a radiation-filled Universe.
 
Upvote 0

Received

True love waits in haunted attics
Mar 21, 2002
12,817
774
42
Visit site
✟53,594.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Dragar said:
I defined 'universe' quite clearly to mean 'everything', Received. That would be both natural and 'supernatural' (whatever the latter is supposed to be).

Well, I think everything implies physical qualification; to say that the universe includes the supernatural, and to speak of the cause of this universe, is to say that the supernatural within this "universe" would be causally responsible for the supernatural. Which doesn't make any sense because the supernatural makes sense only in relation to the "natural". If this "natural" doesn't mean the universe, it is pointless to speak of God or the supernatural as within the universe as well -- for then you are using a word that has no meaning. The supernatural by definition makes sense in relation to the natural. Well, what is the natural if not the universe?

By "universe" you must mean the natural; by speaking of causal factors related to this universe, you are opening the door for something "beyond" this universe, which is the supernatural. If this supernatural is within the universe, intermingled with the natural, what is the point in asking the question "what caused the universe"?

Welcome back to my wired brain, Dragar.
 
Upvote 0

Received

True love waits in haunted attics
Mar 21, 2002
12,817
774
42
Visit site
✟53,594.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
To make it short, if by "universe" you somehow mean the supernatural with the natural (though, I still stand by my statement that the word "supernatural" is thus meaningless), to speak of it as having a cause is nonsensical. You will have me to agree with you there. But this isn't how theists use the word "universe" when referring to causal factors related to it.
 
Upvote 0

Dragar

Like the root of -1
Jan 27, 2004
5,557
230
41
✟29,331.00
Faith
Atheist
To make it short, if by "universe" you somehow mean the supernatural with the natural (though, I still stand by my statement that the word "supernatural" is thus meaningless), to speak of it as having a cause is nonsensical. You will have me to agree with you there. But this isn't how theists use the word "universe" when referring to causal factors related to it.

Usually they mean 'stars and planets and stuff', yes. This is essentially a refined counter to the Cosmological argument.
 
Upvote 0