Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
That's not what the first link said...
The explosive appearance near the beginning of the Paleozoic Era of diverse fossils representing disparate animal clades has long been a puzzle to paleontologists and evolutionary biologists.
Please rethinnk your rely.
Then show me a fully developed mammal from the Cambrian.
Fossils layers typically represent the biome and fauna in which they lived. I wouldn't expect to find a rabbit there.
Why would erosion rates be the same throughout time?
Why wouldn't you expect to find rabbits in Cambrian terrestrial deposits, if creationism were true?
How can you claim that life appeared fully formed in the Cambrian when it doesn't contain a single mammal?
The Cambrian is a time period, or did you forget that?
Your question has already been answered.
That's not what the first link said...
The explosive appearance near the beginning of the Paleozoic Era of diverse fossils representing disparate animal clades has long been a puzzle to paleontologists and evolutionary biologists.
Please rethinnk your rely.
Dude...post 22.No, it hasn't.
Why wouldn't we find a single mammal fossil in terrestrial Cambrian deposits if creationism were true?
Dude...post 22.
Dude, that doesn't answer the question. Why can't we find a single mammal in Cambrian terrestrial deposits? Why can't we find a single lizard, bird, amphibian, shark, whale, or bony fish in the Cambrian?
You're changing the question without answering my question.
"Major phyla and classes of animals suddenly appear fully developed in the cambrian fossils with no ancestral linage leading up to the phyla and classes that are found fossilized there as the T.O.E. predict they should?"
To answer your question....perhaps they wern't in the neighborhood. Perhaps they were able to escape the rising water. Perhaps they bloated and didn't sink to the bodom when the fossils in the cambrian were buried. There are many reasons.
Will you now answer my question or continue to refuse to answer it?
How did you determine that there was no ancestral lineage leading up to those fossils?
How did you determine that they suddenly appeared?
How did you determine that they are fully developed?
Here are the most developed vertebrates in all of the Cambrian.
That's it. Those aren't fully developed. They don't have scales, bones, jaws, fins, and many other features found in fully developed vertebrate fish. And we aren't even getting to the rest of the vertebrate phylum.
How can you say that these are fully developed vertebrates when you can't even find something like an amphibian?
Again, the Cambrian is a time period, not a type of sediment or environment. There are Cambrian terrestrial deposits. They are devoid of life. Why is that?
Why can't we find fully developed fish in the Cambrian marine deposits? How can that be?
With all due respect...you didn't really demonstrate anything.
All you have is an artist conception of what the fossils were. Where is this vertabate evolutionary linage?
Secondly you presented the Myllokunmingia which is a genus of basalchordate from the Lower CambrianMaotianshan shales of China, thought to be a vertebrate,[1] although this is not conclusively proven. Why should I trust your picture?
Perhaps we should look at the eye of the trilobite.
I wanted to check what you actually accept. The Cambrian might have vertebrates but they don't even have jaws or limbs, so I don't see how they do anything but demonstrate deep time and punch a hole in creationism.Is that what I said?
Do those that have faith in evolutionism realize that when the cambrian fossils are examined it is seen that the major phyla and classes of animals suddenly appear fully developed in the cambrian strata with no ancestral linage leading up to the many different phyla and classes.
I wanted to check what you actually accept. The Cambrian might have vertebrates but they don't even have jaws or limbs, so I don't see how they do anything but demonstrate deep time and punch a hole in creationism.
I also think it would be silly of me to get into the nitty gritty of Precambrian fossil evidence with someone who doesn't even believe in paleontology or biology.
You can find Cambrian deposits an every continent. There are probably Cambrian deposits where you live. Perhaps you should have asked where there are Cambrian outcrops. Since Cambrian strata are relatively old, when it comes to sedimentary rocks they will usually have other strata over them. One could always drill down to them if a sample was needed, but it makes finding fossils a bit more difficult.Hello LoudMouth.
You may know something about the Cambrian fossil layers.
When speaking of the Cambrian fossil beds, how many sites around the
world are there?
Also LoudMouth, where are these Cambrian fossil layers located?
Hello SZ.You can find Cambrian deposits an every continent. There are probably Cambrian deposits where you live. Perhaps you should have asked where there are Cambrian outcrops. Since Cambrian strata are relatively old, when it comes to sedimentary rocks they will usually have other strata over them. One could always drill down to them if a sample was needed, but it makes finding fossils a bit more difficult.
Why do you ask? There is no shortage of Cambrian fossils today.
Hello SZ.
Just curious, wondering whether all geological strata are uniform world wide?
Yep, it's a puzzle. I don't think anyone suggests otherwise, do they? But "puzzle"=/= "Goddidit".Do those that have faith in evolutionism realize that when the cambrian fossils are examined it is seen that the major phyla and classes of animals suddenly appear fully developed in the cambrian strata with no ancestral linage leading up to the many different phyla and classes.
In other word, you don't see the speciation of animals producing different genera, then the continuation of morphological evolution producing animals that can be divided into different families and then orders.
Instead, as mentioned above, the cambrian geological record contains fossilized animals that are very diverse in the hierarchy of the taxonomical rank and show no sign of a slow divergence from a common ancestor....the mutations are not show to add up.
The theory belonging to evolutionism tells us that all life evolved from a common ancestor. This hypothesis is taught as fact in our schools and even presented from time to time on this forum as the truth. But is it true or just another lie from the camps of evolutionism which have been kept secret?
The question becomes:
Why do the major phyla and classes of animals suddenly appear fully developed in the cambrian fossils with no ancestral linage leading up to the phyla and classes that are found fossilized there as the T.O.E. predict they should?
Instead, a major problem for evolutionism is recognized. The geological record has fossilized animals that are very diverse in the hierarchy of the taxonomical rank and show no sign of a slow divergence from a common ancestor. The animals found in the cambrian strata are already divided into different phyla and classes.
The bedrock, or the basement strata of rocks don't present descent with modification as the theory of evolutionism calls for. In fact, one could claim that it appears to be pretty much up-side-down.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?