Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Forums
New posts
Forum list
Search forums
Leaderboards
Games
Our Blog
Blogs
New entries
New comments
Blog list
Search blogs
Credits
Transactions
Shop
Blessings: ✟0.00
Tickets
Open new ticket
Watched
Donate
Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
More options
Toggle width
Share this page
Share this page
Share
Reddit
Pinterest
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Email
Share
Link
Menu
Install the app
Install
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
Ethics & Morality
The black community
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Lollerskates" data-source="post: 63813777" data-attributes="member: 330186"><p>O.K. we are probably making marginal ground.</p><p></p><p>Yes, of course the public would not accept a known KKK member. However, the public is rarely afforded good information. The claptrap comes from <u><strong>programming</strong></u>, and the real and scary stuff comes from experience. The KKK are more of sleeper agents, rather that, say, MS-13, Crypts, Bloods, Latin Kings, Aryan Brotherhood, etc. The KKK has been around for a long time; they have had time to hone their deception, and have learned how to reconnoiter their environment for maximum results. That is why I gave those quotes about public incredulity. In the end, the people that yell "conspiracy theorist" are the ones that years later will try to educate the conspiracy theorist. In the "crazy" circle, it was well known that the NSA was keeping diligent and meticulous logs on people's facebook, myspace, google Chrome, etc. Of course, three years ago, those who were talking about this stuff was "too heavy." </p><p></p><p>About the "now it is different" clause: this is the argument many on this thread aer trying to make. Racism has not really changed. The archetype is the same, and it has been bejeweled by clever legislative, economic, financial and judicial interactions and interpretations of the law.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Lollerskates, post: 63813777, member: 330186"] O.K. we are probably making marginal ground. Yes, of course the public would not accept a known KKK member. However, the public is rarely afforded good information. The claptrap comes from [U][B]programming[/B][/U], and the real and scary stuff comes from experience. The KKK are more of sleeper agents, rather that, say, MS-13, Crypts, Bloods, Latin Kings, Aryan Brotherhood, etc. The KKK has been around for a long time; they have had time to hone their deception, and have learned how to reconnoiter their environment for maximum results. That is why I gave those quotes about public incredulity. In the end, the people that yell "conspiracy theorist" are the ones that years later will try to educate the conspiracy theorist. In the "crazy" circle, it was well known that the NSA was keeping diligent and meticulous logs on people's facebook, myspace, google Chrome, etc. Of course, three years ago, those who were talking about this stuff was "too heavy." About the "now it is different" clause: this is the argument many on this thread aer trying to make. Racism has not really changed. The archetype is the same, and it has been bejeweled by clever legislative, economic, financial and judicial interactions and interpretations of the law. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
Ethics & Morality
The black community
Top
Bottom