• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

The Bible

Amisk

Senior Member
Nov 21, 2004
936
63
Wild Rose Country
✟23,905.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
"The Bible contains the mind of God, the state of man, the way of salvation, the doom of sinners, the happiness of believers, light to direct you, food to support you, comfort to cheer you.

It is the traveller’s map, the pilgrim’s staff, the pilot’s compass, the soldier’s sword, the Christian’s charter, a mine of wealth, a paradise of glory, a river of pleasure.

Its doctrines are holy, the decisions are immutable, Christ is its grand subject, our good is its design, the glory of God its end.

Read to be wise; believe it to be safe; practice it to be holy. Read it slowly, frequently and prayerfully. It should fill the memory, rule the heart, and guide the feet.

It is given us in life; it will be opened at the judgment, and be remembered forever.

It involves the highest responsibility, will reward the greatest labour, and condemns all who trifle with its sacred contents. It is the Word of God which shall stand forever."
Eleanor L. Doan <> The Speaker’s Sourcebook<> quoted in Paul B. Smith’s book "The Revelation"
 
  • Like
Reactions: JCFantasy23

brinny

everlovin' shiner of light in dark places
Site Supporter
Mar 23, 2004
249,106
114,203
✟1,378,064.00
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Private
Politics
US-Constitution
"The Bible contains the mind of God, the state of man, the way of salvation, the doom of sinners, the happiness of believers, light to direct you, food to support you, comfort to cheer you.

It is the traveller&#8217;s map, the pilgrim&#8217;s staff, the pilot&#8217;s compass, the soldier&#8217;s sword, the Christian&#8217;s charter, a mine of wealth, a paradise of glory, a river of pleasure.

Its doctrines are holy, the decisions are immutable, Christ is its grand subject, our good is its design, the glory of God its end.

Read to be wise; believe it to be safe; practice it to be holy. Read it slowly, frequently and prayerfully. It should fill the memory, rule the heart, and guide the feet.

It is given us in life; it will be opened at the judgment, and be remembered forever.

It involves the highest responsibility, will reward the greatest labour, and condemns all who trifle with its sacred contents. It is the Word of God which shall stand forever."
Eleanor L. Doan <> The Speaker&#8217;s Sourcebook<> quoted in Paul B. Smith&#8217;s book "The Revelation"

The author of this quote was a Godly man. It's edifying to read his quotes and his sharing of his faith.

God bless you for sharing this dear quote that has blessed me and geared my mind on the God who the author of the quote loved with all his heart, mind, soul, and strength.

Samuel L. Boggs is the author of the quote. May his legacy live on and bless many.
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

BryanW92

Hey look, it's a squirrel!
May 11, 2012
3,571
759
NE Florida
✟30,371.00
Faith
Calvinist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
I'd quibble with a number of things in the starting statement in the thread. First I'd say that nothing fully "contains the mind of God." God is much bigger than the Bible.

It doesn't say that it contains the entirety of the mind of God.
 
Upvote 0

GraceSeeker

Senior Member
Jul 2, 2007
4,339
410
USA
✟24,797.00
Faith
Methodist
Marital Status
Married
There are many godly men,and sometimes they do, and sometimes they do not, agree with one another. Peter Enns has been writing about the Bible for years. Here are some of his thoughts with regard to it:

1. The Bible doesn&#8217;t answer all &#8212; or even most &#8212; of our questions.

Many of our questions, even some of the more pressing questions we face daily, aren&#8217;t answered in the Bible. The Christian Bible isn&#8217;t an answer book but a story of how Jesus answers for us the biggest question of all: what God is like.

2. The Bible isn&#8217;t like God&#8217;s version of Apple&#8217;s &#8220;Terms and Conditions&#8221; agreement.

The Bible doesn&#8217;t lay out before us God&#8217;s terms and conditions, where failure to adhere to one clause in the middle of page 87 will cause a breach of contract and banishment from God&#8217;s graces. The Bible is more like a grand narrative that reorders our imaginations and holds out for us an alternate way of seeing reality &#8212; with God at the heart of it rather than ourselves.

3. The Bible isn&#8217;t a sourcebook for fighting culture wars.

The Bible isn&#8217;t a club we use to gain political power or a way of forcing secular culture to obey our rules. America is not God&#8217;s country and the Bible isn&#8217;t its constitution. Stop it.

4. The Bible doesn&#8217;t guarantee &#8220;success in life.&#8221;

Don&#8217;t listen to those T.V. preachers. The Bible isn&#8217;t a step-by-step guide to success, as if buried there are deep secrets for being happy, healthy, and rich. It is a book that shows what dying to self and surrendering to God are about. The Bible crushes our egos.

5. The Bible is open to multiple interpretations, not just one meaning.

The Bible is ancient and obscure, and its stories are &#8220;gapped&#8221; and flexible, which allows&#8212;even demands&#8212;readers to interpret the Bible legitimately in various ways. This is exactly what has been happening among Jews and Christians for over 2,000 years.

6. The Bible invites debate.

An extremely important lesson for Christians to learn from Judaism is that the Bible invites debate. In fact, it can&#8217;t avoid it, given how open it is to multiple interpretations. Winning Bible feuds with others, getting to the right answer, isn&#8217;t the end goal. The back-and forth with the Bible, and with God, is where deeper faith is found.

7. The Bible doesn&#8217;t &#8220;record&#8221; history objectively but interprets it.

The biblical writers didn&#8217;t try to get history &#8220;right&#8221; in the same sense an author of an academic textbook does. Instead, they interpreted the past in their place and time, for their own communities, to answer their own questions of faith. That&#8217;s why the Bible contains two very different &#8220;histories&#8221; of Israel and the four Gospels that recount Jesus&#8217; life differently.

8. The Bible was written by Jews (and at least one Gentile in the New Testament) in ancient times.

This may sound too obvious to say, but it&#8217;s not. The biblical writers were ancient writers expressing their faith in God using the vocabulary and concepts of their ancient cultures. When we transpose our language and concepts onto biblical writers, even if we are trying to understand the Bible, we will actually distort it.

9. The Bible isn&#8217;t the center of the Christian faith.

Some form of the Bible has always been a part of the life of the church, but the Bible isn&#8217;t the center of our faith. God is &#8212; or, for Christians, what God has done in and through Jesus. The Bible doesn&#8217;t draw attention to itself, but to God.

10. The Bible doesn&#8217;t give us permission to speak for God.

At least not without a lot of wisdom and humility behind it. Knowing the Bible is vital for Christian growth, but it can also become intoxicating. We don&#8217;t always see as clearly as we might think, and what we learn of God in the Bible should always be first and foremost directed inward rather than aimed at others.
 
Upvote 0

brinny

everlovin' shiner of light in dark places
Site Supporter
Mar 23, 2004
249,106
114,203
✟1,378,064.00
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Private
Politics
US-Constitution
There are many godly men,and sometimes they do, and sometimes they do not, agree with one another. Peter Enns has been writing about the Bible for years. Here are some of his thoughts with regard to it:

1. The Bible doesn&#8217;t answer all &#8212; or even most &#8212; of our questions.

Many of our questions, even some of the more pressing questions we face daily, aren&#8217;t answered in the Bible. The Christian Bible isn&#8217;t an answer book but a story of how Jesus answers for us the biggest question of all: what God is like.

2. The Bible isn&#8217;t like God&#8217;s version of Apple&#8217;s &#8220;Terms and Conditions&#8221; agreement.

The Bible doesn&#8217;t lay out before us God&#8217;s terms and conditions, where failure to adhere to one clause in the middle of page 87 will cause a breach of contract and banishment from God&#8217;s graces. The Bible is more like a grand narrative that reorders our imaginations and holds out for us an alternate way of seeing reality &#8212; with God at the heart of it rather than ourselves.

3. The Bible isn&#8217;t a sourcebook for fighting culture wars.

The Bible isn&#8217;t a club we use to gain political power or a way of forcing secular culture to obey our rules. America is not God&#8217;s country and the Bible isn&#8217;t its constitution. Stop it.

4. The Bible doesn&#8217;t guarantee &#8220;success in life.&#8221;

Don&#8217;t listen to those T.V. preachers. The Bible isn&#8217;t a step-by-step guide to success, as if buried there are deep secrets for being happy, healthy, and rich. It is a book that shows what dying to self and surrendering to God are about. The Bible crushes our egos.

5. The Bible is open to multiple interpretations, not just one meaning.

The Bible is ancient and obscure, and its stories are &#8220;gapped&#8221; and flexible, which allows&#8212;even demands&#8212;readers to interpret the Bible legitimately in various ways. This is exactly what has been happening among Jews and Christians for over 2,000 years.

6. The Bible invites debate.

An extremely important lesson for Christians to learn from Judaism is that the Bible invites debate. In fact, it can&#8217;t avoid it, given how open it is to multiple interpretations. Winning Bible feuds with others, getting to the right answer, isn&#8217;t the end goal. The back-and forth with the Bible, and with God, is where deeper faith is found.

7. The Bible doesn&#8217;t &#8220;record&#8221; history objectively but interprets it.

The biblical writers didn&#8217;t try to get history &#8220;right&#8221; in the same sense an author of an academic textbook does. Instead, they interpreted the past in their place and time, for their own communities, to answer their own questions of faith. That&#8217;s why the Bible contains two very different &#8220;histories&#8221; of Israel and the four Gospels that recount Jesus&#8217; life differently.

8. The Bible was written by Jews (and at least one Gentile in the New Testament) in ancient times.

This may sound too obvious to say, but it&#8217;s not. The biblical writers were ancient writers expressing their faith in God using the vocabulary and concepts of their ancient cultures. When we transpose our language and concepts onto biblical writers, even if we are trying to understand the Bible, we will actually distort it.

9. The Bible isn&#8217;t the center of the Christian faith.

Some form of the Bible has always been a part of the life of the church, but the Bible isn&#8217;t the center of our faith. God is &#8212; or, for Christians, what God has done in and through Jesus. The Bible doesn&#8217;t draw attention to itself, but to God.

10. The Bible doesn&#8217;t give us permission to speak for God.

At least not without a lot of wisdom and humility behind it. Knowing the Bible is vital for Christian growth, but it can also become intoxicating. We don&#8217;t always see as clearly as we might think, and what we learn of God in the Bible should always be first and foremost directed inward rather than aimed at others.

Thank you kindly for sharing Peter Enns' thoughts and opinions.
 
Upvote 0

GraceSeeker

Senior Member
Jul 2, 2007
4,339
410
USA
✟24,797.00
Faith
Methodist
Marital Status
Married
Peter Enns, who considers himself an Evangelical, also has this to share:

Jesus read his Bible in ways evangelicals are taught over and over again not to read it.

1. Jesus didn't stick to what "the Bible says," but read it with a creative flare that had little if any connection to what the biblical writer actually meant to say.
Evangelicals are told to respect the Bible by "sticking to the text" and not go beyond it. Jesus did the opposite.

For example, in the book of Exodus (chapter 3), God speaks to Moses from a burning bush. This being the first encounter, God introduces himself (verse 6): "I am the God of your father, the God of Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob." In other words, "The one speaking to you, Moses, is none other than the God of your ancestors, and I've got a very big job for you: go down to Egypt and bring my people out of slavery."

Enter Jesus. We find him in Luke's Gospel (chapter 20) debating a religious party known as the Sadducees. One of their beliefs is that after you die, you're worm food. Other Jews, including Jesus, were of the Pharisee party. They believed that God will one day raise the dead.

So to prove his point--that the Sadducees were wrong and God does indeed raise the dead--Jesus recites the verse from Exodus above, where God introduces himself to Moses.

There isn't a "deeper meaning" to Exodus 3:6. God is just introducing himself to Moses. It's not code for "I will raise the dead."

What Jesus is doing here wouldn't sit well with most Christians if, say, their pastor got up and preached like this. They'd ask him or her to try and stick to the text better and if not to start looking for another line of work.

But what Jesus does here in Luke's Gospel, however strange it seems to us, was par for the course in early Judaism. Luke tells us some of the scribes were very impressed with Jesus's ability to handle the Bible so well!

For Jesus, as for his fellow Jews, the Bible was ready and willing to be handled in creative ways to yield new and unexpected meanings that go far beyond what those words mean when they were first written.

2. Jesus felt he could "pick and choose" what parts of the Old Testament were valid and which weren't.
Evangelicals are taught in no uncertain terms that the Bible is a package deal. Believing what the Bible says isn't like being on a buffet line where you "pick and choose" what you like. Yet, that's what Jesus did.

For example, we have the famous Sermon on the Mount in Matthew's Gospel. Jesus on a mountain speaking to those gathered around him. Several times he quotes something from the Law of Moses and then contrasts what the Law says ("you have heard it said) with a teaching of his own ("but I say to you").

We shouldn't lose sight of the larger idea here: Jesus is acting like Moses. He is on a mountain declaring to the people what God commands of them. The "Sermon on the Mount" isn't really a sermon at all. For one thing no one was bored listening to it. Jesus's words were a public declaration that, now that he was here, there were going to be a few changes made.

At some points in the Sermon on the Mount, Jesus simply expands what his Bible said--like murder being more than not just physical but also emotional (anger) and verbal (insults). But Jesus also claims that some parts of the Bible over and done and it's time to head in a new direction.

Moses may have allowed for divorce for all sorts of reasons, but Jesus said divorce was only allowed in the case of unfaithfulness.

God told Moses that Israelites were to make solemn oaths to one another (sort of a binding contract), but Jesus said the true people of God shouldn't make any oaths. "Let your word be 'Yes, Yes or 'No, no'; anything more than this comes from the evil one."

God told Moses that crimes were punished an "eye for an eye" (to insure the punishment fit the crime) but Jesus said to turn the other cheek rather than seek restitution. In doing so, they would be truly following the will of God.

Jesus taught that some of what God said in the Old Testament was inadequate, and real obedience to God mean it was time to move on. If evangelical pastors or professors pulled moves like this, they'd be working second shift at Target before the week was out.

3. Jesus read his Bible as a Jew, not an evangelical (or even a Christian).
As much as this might not need to be said, it does. When we watch Jesus read his Bible, we are watching a Jewish man reading his Bible. His creative flare and even his "debating" with his own Bible and going in a different direction were part of what it meant to read the Bible in Jesus's Jewish world.

That doesn't mean Jesus didn't revere the Bible. He did. But he revered it in Jewish ways, not evangelical ways.

And that may be the hardest lesson for evangelicals to learn, that Jesus did not agree with things about the Bible that evangelicals take for granted and consider non-negotiable--like "stick to the text" and, "God's word is eternal and never changes."

If evangelicals (and I am among them) pay attention to Jesus, they will learn a vital lesson: Our own Bible shows us that getting the Bible right isn't the center of the Christian faith. Getting Jesus right is.
 
Upvote 0

brinny

everlovin' shiner of light in dark places
Site Supporter
Mar 23, 2004
249,106
114,203
✟1,378,064.00
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Private
Politics
US-Constitution
Peter Enns, who considers himself an Evangelical, also has this to share:

Jesus read his Bible in ways evangelicals are taught over and over again not to read it.

1. Jesus didn't stick to what "the Bible says," but read it with a creative flare that had little if any connection to what the biblical writer actually meant to say.
Evangelicals are told to respect the Bible by "sticking to the text" and not go beyond it. Jesus did the opposite.

For example, in the book of Exodus (chapter 3), God speaks to Moses from a burning bush. This being the first encounter, God introduces himself (verse 6): "I am the God of your father, the God of Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob." In other words, "The one speaking to you, Moses, is none other than the God of your ancestors, and I've got a very big job for you: go down to Egypt and bring my people out of slavery."

Enter Jesus. We find him in Luke's Gospel (chapter 20) debating a religious party known as the Sadducees. One of their beliefs is that after you die, you're worm food. Other Jews, including Jesus, were of the Pharisee party. They believed that God will one day raise the dead.

So to prove his point--that the Sadducees were wrong and God does indeed raise the dead--Jesus recites the verse from Exodus above, where God introduces himself to Moses.

There isn't a "deeper meaning" to Exodus 3:6. God is just introducing himself to Moses. It's not code for "I will raise the dead."

What Jesus is doing here wouldn't sit well with most Christians if, say, their pastor got up and preached like this. They'd ask him or her to try and stick to the text better and if not to start looking for another line of work.

But what Jesus does here in Luke's Gospel, however strange it seems to us, was par for the course in early Judaism. Luke tells us some of the scribes were very impressed with Jesus's ability to handle the Bible so well!

For Jesus, as for his fellow Jews, the Bible was ready and willing to be handled in creative ways to yield new and unexpected meanings that go far beyond what those words mean when they were first written.

2. Jesus felt he could "pick and choose" what parts of the Old Testament were valid and which weren't.
Evangelicals are taught in no uncertain terms that the Bible is a package deal. Believing what the Bible says isn't like being on a buffet line where you "pick and choose" what you like. Yet, that's what Jesus did.

For example, we have the famous Sermon on the Mount in Matthew's Gospel. Jesus on a mountain speaking to those gathered around him. Several times he quotes something from the Law of Moses and then contrasts what the Law says ("you have heard it said) with a teaching of his own ("but I say to you").

We shouldn't lose sight of the larger idea here: Jesus is acting like Moses. He is on a mountain declaring to the people what God commands of them. The "Sermon on the Mount" isn't really a sermon at all. For one thing no one was bored listening to it. Jesus's words were a public declaration that, now that he was here, there were going to be a few changes made.

At some points in the Sermon on the Mount, Jesus simply expands what his Bible said--like murder being more than not just physical but also emotional (anger) and verbal (insults). But Jesus also claims that some parts of the Bible over and done and it's time to head in a new direction.

Moses may have allowed for divorce for all sorts of reasons, but Jesus said divorce was only allowed in the case of unfaithfulness.

God told Moses that Israelites were to make solemn oaths to one another (sort of a binding contract), but Jesus said the true people of God shouldn't make any oaths. "Let your word be 'Yes, Yes or 'No, no'; anything more than this comes from the evil one."

God told Moses that crimes were punished an "eye for an eye" (to insure the punishment fit the crime) but Jesus said to turn the other cheek rather than seek restitution. In doing so, they would be truly following the will of God.

Jesus taught that some of what God said in the Old Testament was inadequate, and real obedience to God mean it was time to move on. If evangelical pastors or professors pulled moves like this, they'd be working second shift at Target before the week was out.

3. Jesus read his Bible as a Jew, not an evangelical (or even a Christian).
As much as this might not need to be said, it does. When we watch Jesus read his Bible, we are watching a Jewish man reading his Bible. His creative flare and even his "debating" with his own Bible and going in a different direction were part of what it meant to read the Bible in Jesus's Jewish world.

That doesn't mean Jesus didn't revere the Bible. He did. But he revered it in Jewish ways, not evangelical ways.

And that may be the hardest lesson for evangelicals to learn, that Jesus did not agree with things about the Bible that evangelicals take for granted and consider non-negotiable--like "stick to the text" and, "God's word is eternal and never changes."

If evangelicals (and I am among them) pay attention to Jesus, they will learn a vital lesson: Our own Bible shows us that getting the Bible right isn't the center of the Christian faith. Getting Jesus right is.

Interesting opinions. Thank you kindly for sharing Peter Enns' thoughts and opinions.
 
Upvote 0

GraceSeeker

Senior Member
Jul 2, 2007
4,339
410
USA
✟24,797.00
Faith
Methodist
Marital Status
Married
Some might find this an interesting read: Reading the Bible vs. Being Read by the Bible


What is the Bible?


The Bible is the witness of Israel, the prophets and the Church to the Logos, the One Word of God made flesh in Jesus Christ.

Like John the Baptist pointing to Christ, the Bible is testimony which points to the One Word God speaks to us in Jesus.

Therefore, we do not believe in the Bible; we believe in the One to whom the Bible bears witness.

We do not have faith in the Bible; we trust that the Bible&#8217;s words are reliable- not inerrant- testimony about the Word of God, Jesus Christ, in whom we have faith.

&#8220;He Scripture came as a witness to testify to the light, so that all might believe through him scripture. He scripture himself itself was not the light, but he it came to testify to the light. The true light, which enlightens everyone, was coming into the world.&#8221;

- John 1.7-9


(How) Is the Bible the Word of God?


The Bible is the Word of God in that scripture- when proclaimed rightly and received faithfully- is the reliable testimony to the one Word of God, Jesus Christ who is the logic of God made flesh.

So when Christians use the term &#8216;the Word of God&#8217; they&#8217;re actually referring to multiple forms whose authority and &#8216;infallibility&#8217; varies by degrees.

Imagine, for instance, the image of three concentric circles.

At the center, in the inner, centermost circle, is the Logos, the eternal Word of God that was made flesh in Jesus Christ.

Christ is the only capital &#8216;W&#8217; word of God in which Christians believe and after which Christians conform their lives.

Next in the trio is the testimony to the Word of God given to us by Israel, the prophets and the Church. This testimony to the Word of God is the word we call scripture.

In the final, outermost, circle is the word of God as its proclaimed and interpreted in the worship and ministry of the Church to which Christians will often reply: &#8216;This is the word of the God for the people of God/Thanks be to God.&#8217;

The only true, literal, infallible, eternal Word of God then is Jesus Christ, the Logos of God.

The bible is the word of God in that it points us to the one Word of God, Jesus Christ.

Our reading and preaching of scripture is- or perhaps more apt, becomes- the word of God for us only when it faithfully proclaims and embodies the one Word of God, Jesus Christ.

&#8220;Many other signs therefore Jesus also performed in the presence of the disciples, which are not written in this book; but these have been written that you may believe that Jesus is the Christ, the Son of God; and that believing you may have life in His name.&#8221; - John 20.30-31



Should We Interpret the Bible Literally?


The form of the scripture text should determine how you interpret scripture.

If the scripture text is poetic, then you should it interpret it poetically. Metaphorically.

If the scripture text is exhortative, then you better go and do whatever it says. Whatever is the best modern-day equivalent of what it says.

If the scripture text is parabolic, then you should scratch your head and look for the scandal of the Gospel. Or whatever would be likewise scandalous in our day.

If the scripture text is fabulous, then you should dig for the deeper meaning, the text&#8217;s artist seeks to show rather than simply tell. e.g., Garden of Eden.

But when Christians refer to the bible as the word of God, don&#8217;t forget that while Christianity is indeed a revealed religion, the revelation of the Word of God is a mediated revelation.

Our access to the Logos comes to us only by way of scripture and the Church. Scripture therefore is not revelation. The pages and printed words in your bible are not, in and of themselves, the Word of God. They are our testimony to God&#8217;s Word as its been disclosed to Israel and the Church. Because of that testimony, scripture is authoritative for us and it is sufficient for communicating all we need to know of and follow this God.

At the same time, one&#8217;s testimony is never identical with the person of whom one testifies. Scripture&#8217;s testimony can only partially and provisionally capture the mystery of the eternal Word.

None of this threatening should be threatening, however, because the Word of God, Jesus Christ, is a mediated revelation.

Testimony can be imperfect without jeopardizing the perfection of the One to whom scripture testifies.

In other words, the bible does not (always) need to be interpreted literally because we do not believe in the bible; we believe in the One to whom the bible testifies. We worship Jesus Christ not the bible.

And, it should be pointed out, Jesus himself did not interpret scripture literally:

I say &#8220;You are gods,

sons of the Most High, all of you;

nevertheless, you shall die like mortals

and fall like any prince&#8221; (Psalm 82 vv. 6-7)


What&#8217;s Wrong with Reading the Bible Literally?


Biblical literalism attributes a supernatural origin to scripture. The bible, in this view, is the direct, unfiltered Word of God. It&#8217;s an approach to Christian scripture that has a correlative in how Muslims understand the Qu&#8217;ran as containing the very words God dictated to the Prophet.

Scripture, it is held, is as free of error as had it fallen from heaven printed and bound. This view of scripture is a modern belief, arising only in the late 19th century.

Such an absolute assertion of scripture&#8217;s divine origins and textual infallibility provoke several significant problems.

First, positing every word of scripture as the literal, inerrant word of God flattens the whole of scripture, making every word just as important and authoritative as any other. The purity of codes of Leviticus are now logically equivalent in importance to the sermon on the mount, God&#8217;s instructions to the take the holy land by bloodshed as critical as Christ&#8217;s self-sacrifice.

By flattening scripture and making it all of equal import, the central thread gets lost:

the One Word of God, Jesus Christ.

Biblicism makes Christian scripture, like the Qu&#8217;ran, into a collection of equally authoritative precepts, teachings and codes instead of diverse, polyvalent testimony to the saving love of God made flesh in Jesus Christ.

Second, demanding that every word of scripture be infallible forces the Christian in to a kind of cognitive dissonance where we must ignore or disavow what we learn in the natural world should our learning seem at odds with scripture. So then a literalistic rendering of the creation story, for example, forces some Christians to dismiss evolutionary theory or prehistoric life.

Gripping onto scripture&#8217;s infallibility can also lock Christians into defending or perpetuating the social mores of the cultural context in which scripture was first recorded.

Third, biblical literalism is an unmediated revelation.

Scripture is the Word of God with or without the testimony of faithful witnesses.

While, in the fundamentalist minds, this secures scripture from the acids of the modern world, it does so at the expense of any role for God&#8217;s People. Rather than the Word of God being mediated through the testimony of God&#8217;s People, and hence being inherently relational, it is instead presented in an authoritarian mode.

Scripture is something to which we must conform; it&#8217;s not something which invites us into a transformative relationship.

&#8220;All Scripture is God-breathed and is useful for teaching, rebuking, correcting and training in righteousness.&#8221;

- 2 Timothy 3.16



How Do I Read the Bible?


The bible should not be treated as a talisman as though it will yield any answer to any question we might ask.

Scripture does not ask us to treat it as a magical object. It does not call for our passive reverence; scripture expects our engagement. With that mind, I offer some guidelines for you to consider when reading a given text:

1. Scripture should be interpreted in light of its historical and cultural context.

This is where an annotated, academic bible can transform your reading of scripture. Knowing the original context of a given passage not only can open up that text to new and fresh hearings it can also prevent uninformed, personal interpretations that are wide off the mark of the text&#8217;s original intent.

2. Scripture should not be bound by its original context either.

If, as we believe, God&#8217;s Spirit can use the testimony of the past to speak a fresh Word to us, then knowing the original context can help us sort out right and wrong interpretations but it does not limit our interpretations. That is, what Paul said is not necessarily what Paul says to us to day.

3. Scripture should be read theocentrically, with God at the center as its primary protagonist.

Maybe this strikes you as obvious, but in our culture today many Christians value scripture only for its utility, for what it says to me. Scripture should necessarily have implications for our lives so long as we realize that it&#8217;s not first of all a story about us. The parable of the prodigal son, for example, is primarily an illustration of God&#8217;s character; it&#8217;s not first an illustration of us. &#8216;What does this passage say about God?&#8217; is a question that should always precede &#8216;What does this passage speak to me?&#8217;

4. Scripture should be read corporately.

The bible is the story of God&#8217;s engagement with God&#8217;s chosen People, Israel and the Church. The bible is testimony about God for the community of God; therefore, you can&#8217;t truly read the bible rightly apart from God&#8217;s People. Reading scripture with others, on Sunday morning or in small groups, is the best way to hear clearly what the Spirit says today to us. Jews and Christians read in company with others, adapting and even submitting our understandings to the understandings of our fellow saints, living and dead.

5. Scripture should be read in light of one&#8217;s own context.

This is both a caution and a command. Realize that what you see or hear is determined by where you stand. A poor Mayan woman in Guatemala who&#8217;s suffered exploitation and war will hear the Magnificat differently from a white, upper class woman in the United States. Very often the Word both these women will hear will be a true Word for their context.

&#8216;Your word is a lamp for my feet, a light for my path&#8230;&#8217; &#8211; Psalm 119



Is the Bible our only authority?


Of course not.

Jesus Christ, the fullness of God made flesh, who reigns the Earth from the right hand of the Father, is our sole authority.

Jesus is Lord not the Bible nor our imperfect interpretation of it.

The Bible is our primary witness to Christ, but even the Bible&#8217;s witness is mediated to us by the witness of the saints and our own experience of the Holy Spirit&#8217;s work in the world- the gift of the world itself speaks to the sheer gratuity of God.

And because all truth is God&#8217;s truth, our reason and apprehension of the created world elaborate upon (and sometimes correct) the witness to God we find in the Bible.

&#8216;Therefore let the entire house of Israel know with certainty that God has made him both Lord and Messiah, this Jesus whom you crucified.&#8217;

&#8211; Acts 2.36
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

brinny

everlovin' shiner of light in dark places
Site Supporter
Mar 23, 2004
249,106
114,203
✟1,378,064.00
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Private
Politics
US-Constitution
"The Bible contains the mind of God, the state of man, the way of salvation, the doom of sinners, the happiness of believers, light to direct you, food to support you, comfort to cheer you.

It is the traveller’s map, the pilgrim’s staff, the pilot’s compass, the soldier’s sword, the Christian’s charter, a mine of wealth, a paradise of glory, a river of pleasure.

Its doctrines are holy, the decisions are immutable, Christ is its grand subject, our good is its design, the glory of God its end.

Read to be wise; believe it to be safe; practice it to be holy. Read it slowly, frequently and prayerfully. It should fill the memory, rule the heart, and guide the feet.

It is given us in life; it will be opened at the judgment, and be remembered forever.

It involves the highest responsibility, will reward the greatest labour, and condemns all who trifle with its sacred contents. It is the Word of God which shall stand forever."
Eleanor L. Doan <> The Speaker’s Sourcebook<> quoted in Paul B. Smith’s book "The Revelation"

Reminds me of these two verses:

"Thy word is a lamp unto my feet, and a light unto my path." ~Psalm 119:105

"Thy word have I hid in mine heart, that I might not sin against thee." ~Psalm 119:111
 
Upvote 0

GraceSeeker

Senior Member
Jul 2, 2007
4,339
410
USA
✟24,797.00
Faith
Methodist
Marital Status
Married
Collin Packer, pastor of Greenville Oaks Church of Christ (Allen, TX), has some interesting reflections on the Bible for someone coming out of that denominational background...

&#8220;The Bible: Uncut&#8221; (by Collin Packer)

My childhood heroes weren&#8217;t Superman, Spiderman, or The Hulk.
My superheroes were named Daniel, David, and Moses.

That opener sounds like a sad tale from a child who grew up in a home with parents who denied me the pleasure of cable television in an effort to keep me away from &#8220;worldly influences.&#8221;
My list of heroes wasn&#8217;t the result of a conscious censoring attempt by my parents. It was the result of a childhood full of summers spent at VBS.

I&#8217;m a Millennial from the big city, which meant my summer VBS tour didn&#8217;t include your grandma&#8217;s VBS with coloring sheets, crackers, and apple juice. I took my turn at Vacation Bible Schools that included hour-long professional musicals, color-coordinated t-shirts, and laminated nametags.

When they told the story of Daniel, I wanted to be Daniel.
When they told the story of David, I wanted to be David.
When they told the story of Moses, I wanted to be Moses.
And that&#8217;s the problem.

It was a problem then, and it&#8217;s a problem today with the advent of numerous Children&#8217;s Bibles read in households across the country.
I wanted to be Daniel because he survived a lions&#8217; den.
I wanted to be David because he took down giants.
I wanted to be Moses because he parted the Red Sea.
That was the story my VBS and Children&#8217;s Bible told me. They made these characters out to be heroes who had no flaws and only experienced victory.

Now, let me first say, we have a Children&#8217;s Bible in our home and we read from it regularly. I&#8217;m not condemning Children&#8217;s Bibles. They serve a great purpose.
Children&#8217;s Bibles serve the same purpose as radio-edited music on your drive in the car with your children. They&#8217;re &#8220;safe and fun for the whole family.&#8221; They edit out the objectionable content in the Bible.

And there&#8217;s a lot of objectionable content in the Bible. If you don&#8217;t believe me, then start reading Song of Songs as a bedtime story to your kids every night and just listen to the questions they ask. That&#8217;s one way to ensure you have the &#8220;Birds & Bees&#8221; conversation earlier than you had hoped.

Children&#8217;s Bibles are appropriate for&#8230;well&#8230;children. But you&#8217;re not a child anymore.
There&#8217;s more to the story than VBS or your Children&#8217;s Bible told you.

While there are many reasons why people don&#8217;t enter the doors of churches, one key reason is our inability to read beyond the edited Children&#8217;s stories we learned growing up. And those stories inoculate us from the real power of the gospel.
Somewhere along my childhood VBS tour (with its strobe lights and choreographed dance moves), I got the idea that God only uses superheroes like Daniel, David, and Moses.
And that message wasn&#8217;t hopeful as I entered young adulthood and experienced my propensity to mess things up.
Our churches desperately need the rest of the story.

I needed the rest of the story.
Because&#8230;
Biblical illiteracy&#8217;s greatest casualty isn&#8217;t lower scores on Bible quizzes.
Biblical illiteracy&#8217;s greatest casualty is the assumption that imperfect people can&#8217;t be used by God.
I needed to know that Daniel emerged from the lions&#8217; den and remained in exile.
I needed to know that David knocked out seven of the Ten Commandments in one weekend.
I needed to know that Moses doubted his ability to lead people.
I need to know that none of that disqualified them from being used by God.
In fact, those experiences were the very things that qualified them to tell people the story of God&#8217;s forgiveness, redemption, and grace.
And if God could use those people, then perhaps it&#8217;s safe to take off my superhero costume that I stride into church wearing so often.
Our churches need to tell the unedited, uncut version of the Bible. I&#8217;ve found there&#8217;s more hope in that story than the color-filled pages I read growing up.

There&#8217;s nothing wrong with wanting to be like Daniel, David, and Moses.
But let us never forget that they aren&#8217;t the main characters in their stories. God is.
And that&#8217;s something I never learned at VBS.
 
Upvote 0

GraceSeeker

Senior Member
Jul 2, 2007
4,339
410
USA
✟24,797.00
Faith
Methodist
Marital Status
Married
"The Bible does only one thing: it calls us to faith and obedience in the truth that we know in Jesus Christ. Scripture points not to our paths but to the truth of God." --Dietrich Bonhoeffer


What does this mean for us as we encounter people who claim to know the same Jesus that we know, but feel led by him in different directions than we would acknowledge as being the direction Christ as led us? Or that we even dreamed he might lead anyone?



---edit---

Maybe that's a question for a new thread?
 
Upvote 0

JCFantasy23

In a Kingdom by the Sea.
Jul 1, 2008
46,753
6,386
Lakeland, FL
✟509,627.00
Country
United States
Gender
Female
Faith
Methodist
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Others
I'd quibble with a number of things in the starting statement in the thread. First I'd say that nothing fully "contains the mind of God." God is much bigger than the Bible.

I caught that and thought that too - I just kind of slipped "some" in the line ^_^
 
Upvote 0