The Bible Proves Evolution

[FrumiousBandersnatch]

In fact your displaying child like behaviour.

I may have been over-critical - I'll rephrase it:

Such poor communication does you no favours.

p.s. your → you're

 

[messianist]

There are no facts in, "Waw look at you very observing.". It's just incoherent.

you just seem to be acting clever.

 

[messianist]

I may have been over-critical - I'll rephrase it:

Such poor communication does you no favours.

p.s. your → you're

The thing is you and others understood my messages, it was blatant that you didn't like what I said, so decided to throw child like comment at me in regards to my spelling ect.

Maybe I should use my computer instead of my phone to reach your high standards that you have displayed my sincere apologies

 

[FrumiousBandersnatch]

The thing is you and others understood my messages, it was blatant that you didn't like what I said, so decided to throw child like comment at me in regards to my spelling ect.

Maybe I should use my computer instead of my phone to reach your high standards that you have displayed my sincere apologies

It's simple - you made an incoherent post and you were pulled up for it. Making a song and dance about it won't help.

 

[messianist]

I think it's you that's making a song and dance not me.

 

[FrumiousBandersnatch]

I think it's you that's making a song and dance not me.

See? you can make a coherent post.

 

[messianist]

Your lack of ability to understand is not my problem.

 

[Speedwell]

I think it's you that's making a song and dance not me.

We all do it from time to time, and we all get teased about it, too. Carry on regardless.

 

[messianist]

We all do it from time to time, and we all get teased about it, too. Carry on regardless.

I'm not bothered one bit to be honest.

 

[klutedavid]

Do you have to become a scientist to perceive this evidence, because I cannot think of any such evidence off the top of my head. The only thing that comes to mind is the carbon dating stuff, but I heard this was unreliable.

You don't need Carbon dating. You can check ice core samples and how far they can go back in time. You can research coral core samples the same as ice core samples.
You can read up on rock strata layers in Geology, and find out how deep in time they go back. Interested in Astronomy? Astronomers will take you back billions of years. Nuclear physics will also use the words, billions of years.

The evidence is right across the spectrum. You can throw C14 dating in the bin if you want, nothing changes.

Why wouldn't people begin to see whatever secular science tells them when they have committed to taking on their framework?

There is no such thing as secular science. There is evidence and the evidence speaks for itself.

I think the evidence should be questioned again and again...and again.

I agree with what you said. But there is no way to support a young earth in science. Archaeology won't allow civilization to be dated to 6000 years ago. Biology pushes mankind back way further that 6000 years.

Also, assuming that dating methods are correct to what exists now, why would anyone trust that it remains the same since the beginning, especially since death has since entered the world, along with great catastrophes?

We don't need to bother with the beginning, let there be infinite energy. All we need to do is exceed 6000 years in dating anything, and the case is closed.

 

[George95]

MOD HAT ON

Due to multiple issues within this thread, the Moderation Team has decided to close this thread.

MOD HAT OFF​