• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

The Bible - errant or inerrant?

Status
Not open for further replies.

childofGod31

Regular Member
May 13, 2006
1,604
77
✟24,791.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
Yes I did.:thumbsup: But did you see this:



Regardless of if you're talking about a dot or a tiddle, if you open the door for people to view ANYTHING of God's word as anything but inerrant, you open the door for them to view it all as errant.

So why does the BODY OF CHRIST keep trying to open this door?

It is the work of the enemy to author such confusion and to attempt to convince people that "God didn't really say that".

People are used to live by things that are not error free. They can do it. If they like the idea, they will go for it.

The message of salvation is a very short one and would take up 2 pages of the Bible. The rest is just doctrinal stuff and it doesn't matter in the long run. Loving God, loving people and obeying God is what counts. The rest, if it has errors, doesn't matter for salvation.

God is not looking to raise "the teachers of the law". He is looking for a simple relationship.
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

Zaac

Well-Known Member
Nov 19, 2004
8,430
426
Atlanta, GA.
✟12,748.00
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Single
You know there are outright numerical erros, right?

"For instance, how old was Ahaziah when he began his rule over Jerusalem. 2 Chronicles 22:2 says 42 years. 2 Kings 8:26 says that he was only 22 years old. Of course, this is the KJV. This error seems to be fixed in the NIV, but it does show that errors can exist within the translation."

It doesn't take away from the truth; it's a copyists error. Fortunately, salvation doesn't hinge on Biblical inerrancy, or at least the version you're talking about.

Salvation depends on people faithfully trusting in the truth that God has given and subsequently trusting God's grace to save them through that faith. And if they have the very people who were supposedly saved by being pointed to Christ through Scripture denying its truthfulness, why should they faithfully trust what it says and see a need for confession and repentance and coming to faith in Christ?

So again, perhaps yall need to check your motives for trying to push this notion of Biblical errancy. You're pushing the same stumbling block that got Adam and Eve kicked out the Garden.
 
Upvote 0

Zaac

Well-Known Member
Nov 19, 2004
8,430
426
Atlanta, GA.
✟12,748.00
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Single
It's a new idea and it scares people. That makes sense. But people will adapt, as they always adapt.

WOW. God's word reigns true 100 % of the time.
1 But there were also false prophets among the people, just as there will be false teachers among you. They will secretly introduce destructive heresies, even denying the sovereign Lord who bought them—bringing swift destruction on themselves. 2 Many will follow their depraved conduct and will bring the way of truth into disrepute. 2 Peter 2:1-2

So the Bible has human error factor, so what? So do the rest of the books which people use to live by and to learn from. We can use these books inspite of human error. And it's the same with the Bible.

So you're saying that the Bible is just another book?

And what does a Christian REALLY need to know from the Bible?


:doh:

Simply that he should love God and love neighbor. And that's all. The rest of the stuff might be fun to study and to contemplate, but it doesn't matter in the long run.

The rest of the stuff is God's word. And it's God's word that tells us 3 We know that we have come to know him if we keep his commands. 4 Whoever says, “I know him,” but does not do what he commands is a liar, and the truth is not in that person. 5 But if anyone obeys his word, love for God[a] is truly made complete in them. This is how we know we are in him: 6 Whoever claims to live in him must live as Jesus did. 1 John 2:3-6


So HE SAYS that if you love Him, you're gonna obey that other stuff that you say doesn't matter. So who should the Christian trust: you or GOD?

Now for the peson who doesn't stand on the absolute truth that is God's word, a door will continue to attempt to be opened to allow for that person to be in control and make truth subjective to his every whim.

Did you just come to know of Jesus without knowing what He did? Or did someone just walk up to you one day and say "hey you, love Jesus and love your neighbor" and you were suddenly saved?

For the true follower of Jesus Christ who worships in spirit and truth, if God says it, that's just what it is. He didn't inspire men to write down His word for it to be ignored.

So if there are mistakes there, well, it's not going to affect a person's salvation as long as he keeps the point of it all: Love God and Love the people. God is not looking to raise "the teachers of the law". He is looking for a simple relationship.

If there are simple mistakes in there, why should anyone trust you that the point is simply to love God and love people? Maybe that part was a mistake too? Maybe you added that to make your life simpler? I mean if there are simple mistakes throughout, why do you get to decide which part was not a mistake?

So human error does not matter. A relationship with God can exist in spite of that.



And where are you getting all this from? Did God descend from heaven , sit on your porch and dictate this to you?

You've obviously found out about the character of God and what He did from some place that you thought to be trustworthy and completely truthful if you believe it?

Human error doesn't enter the equation. It's God's inspired word, not man's.



A Christian is able to love God and people in spite of any mistakes.

You're putting the cart before the horse. If you don't know how to get to God because you can't trust what is the truth, then how do you skip to loving Him?
 
Upvote 0

Walter Kovacs

Justice is coming, no matter what we do.
Jan 22, 2011
1,922
91
Florida
Visit site
✟25,124.00
Faith
Christian Seeker
Marital Status
In Relationship
Salvation depends on people faithfully trusting in the truth that God has given and subsequently trusting God's grace to save them through that faith. And if they have the very people who were supposedly saved by being pointed to Christ through Scripture denying its truthfulness, why should they faithfully trust what it says and see a need for confession and repentance and coming to faith in Christ?

Uh...people are not saved by Biblical inerrancy. It's pretty dangerous to build your faith around inerrancy, because once you see that it's a poor position to defend, at least the way you're saying, your faith starts to waver.
 
Upvote 0

Zaac

Well-Known Member
Nov 19, 2004
8,430
426
Atlanta, GA.
✟12,748.00
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Single
Uh...people are not saved by Biblical inerrancy. It's pretty dangerous to build your faith around inerrancy, because once you see that it's a poor position to defend, at least the way you're saying, your faith starts to waver.

And neither did I say that they are saved by Biblical inerrancy. But there is an element of the unsaved faithfully trusting that what they are being told as far as the Gospel goes to be the absolute truth in order to trust it and accept Jesus Christ as Lord and Savior.

So one of you, please explain to me, how many people you have led to Christ by telling them that the Scripture, inspired by this God that you tell them can save them, isn't absolutely true?

Why would they listen to anything you say if you put forth that the very Scripture they must hear to be pointed to Christ is not absolutely true?

Do any of you share the Gospel?
 
Upvote 0

Walter Kovacs

Justice is coming, no matter what we do.
Jan 22, 2011
1,922
91
Florida
Visit site
✟25,124.00
Faith
Christian Seeker
Marital Status
In Relationship
So one of you, please explain to me, how many people you have led to Christ by telling them that the Scripture, inspired by this God that you tell them can save them, isn't absolutely true?

I never claimed it wasn't...I said there are numerical "typos," for lack of a better word, copyists errors or small errors in genealogies. I've said three times now every truth the Bible affirms is ABSOLUTELY true...I fail to see how small typos take away from that. It's not like algebra, where one tiny error throws off the whole equation. A typo, mistranslated word or a copyists error in one of the many genealogies doesn't affect the validity and truth of the Word in the least.
 
Upvote 0
G

gideons300

Guest
By the way, the apostoles did not have a Bible and yet faith was possible for them. Paul did not have a Bible and yet faith was possible. Abraham did not have a Bible and yet faith was possible. Moses did not have a Bible and yet faith was possible.


This is very true. Now, how did you know these examples to be a fact without believing what the Word of God told us about them? How are you even sure there even WAS an Abraham, or how much the word has been corrupted over the centuries?

Unless we draw a line in the sand and trust God to give us all we need through His word for our salvation, preserving the truth for all until He returns, then we either serve a weak and eroded myth of a true God, or a God who has given our generation a severe handicap as to entering heaven by not making sure of the purity of His word.

If Abraham had faith without the full Bible, how much more should we with it? Our responsibility is increased, not decreased. Abraham would have given his right arm to see and know what we see and know through the truths the word of God gives us. As Paul said, how shall we neglect such a great salvation? How shall we fight off satan if our sword of the spirt, thew word of God, untrustworthy?

In China, churchs in the underground often only have one or two books of the Bible for the entire congregation, and treasure them as if printed on pages of gold. They are exchanged with other congregations so that all may eventually have the full Bible.

But how often we in the west have five Bibles lying around our house, all gathering dust, while satan continues to erode our faith more and more in God's power to set us free from his influences. Who benefits from our beginning to question the authority and authenticity of the word of God- the kingdom of darkness or the kingdom of light?

We have no excuse, and must be very careful to not fall into the trap whereby we end up forming God in our image, and create a God to our liking. If we do, we are still eating of the tree of the knowledge of good and evil. whereby we are not submitted to the word of God but visa versa. We are not given the pivelidge of choosing which verses we like and which we choose to discard. It is dangerous ground indeed.

If we are to live by every word out of the mouth of God, if John warns all to not add to or take away from what has been written, my humble suggestion is to take the word at face value, and let God have His way with us. I see it as the only safe way to live. Otherwise we are simply gambling with our eternal souls.

Blessings,

Bruce
 
Upvote 0
G

gideons300

Guest
You only say that there is no mistakes because you BELIEVE that there isn't any. You didn't actually CHECK. But I've seen them. I can't deny the facts. At the moment I am talking about the mistakes in facts. Like 3 children in this verse and 5 in the other verse (supposed to be talking about the same thing). 3 rooms in one verse and 5 rooms in another. What does it prove? That the Bible was subject to human error. That's all I am trying to say. And to me that means it's errant. UNLESS, as somebody has said: inerrant is only referring to the theology rather than factual data.
Brother, you might well be correct as to errors in numbers. But here is what I have learned about our enemy. He does not confront us in a full scale war. He slithers in the back door, undetected, planting little seeds of doubt, eroding faith like a simple drop of water on a rock. Given time, the rock is no match.

In the same way, that little seed of doubt will give way to more doubt and then more still. Our safe place is in simply not worrying about what may truly be little numerical errors. Are there errors? I do not care. It has no bearing on my eternal soul. What I do care about is the truth of the death, burial and ressurection of our savior. We have been bought with a price. My duty now is to give myself to this wonderful master, body, soul, spirit and mind.

Give it all to God and say "Thou knowest." Trust in His word implicitely and give no place to the devil for I guarantee, he will not be satisfied with occupying a small part of us. He wants to devour ALL of us, and is patient beyond measure, knowing that if we drift away from truth long enough, little by little, our faith in Jesus will eventually simply be head knowledge with no trust involved at all, and we will end up being men who have a form of godliness, but in our lives denying the power thereof. We will become men who draw near Him with our lips but with our hearts far from Him. We will have a name that we liveth but in fact, we are quite dead. The truth of it will have not sunk in yet, that is all.

Blessings,

Bruce
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Zaac
Upvote 0

Zaac

Well-Known Member
Nov 19, 2004
8,430
426
Atlanta, GA.
✟12,748.00
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Single
I never claimed it wasn't...I said there are numerical "typos," for lack of a better word, copyists errors or small errors in genealogies. I've said three times now every truth the Bible affirms is ABSOLUTELY true...I fail to see how small typos take away from that. It's not like algebra, where one tiny error throws off the whole equation. A typo, mistranslated word or a copyists error in one of the many genealogies doesn't affect the validity and truth of the Word in the least.

And I have said several times now, if the theology of what is said is not affected, what is the motif for even opening the door that the Bible is not inerrant because of some typos?

All it does is present an unneeded stumbling block to an unsaved world. The devil had people questioning the absoluteness of God's word. The Body of Christ SHOULD NOT be doing the same.

You know all to well that the minute you say that the Bible is errant because of some typos, all everyone who isn't saved is gonna hear is "the Bible is full of mistakes. I have no reason to trust what Christians say about their God".

Why do some insist on opening this door?
 
Upvote 0

Zaac

Well-Known Member
Nov 19, 2004
8,430
426
Atlanta, GA.
✟12,748.00
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Single
Brother, you might well be correct as to errors in numbers. But here is what I have learned about our enemy. He does not confront us in a full scale war. He slithers in the back door, undetected, planting little seeds of doubt, eroding faith like a simple drop of water on a rock. Given time, the rock is no match.

Given time, that little seed of doubt will give way to more doubt and then more still. Our safe place is in simply not worrying about what may truly be little numerical errors. Give them to God and say "Thou knowest." Trust in His word implicitely and give no place tothe devil for I guarantee, he will not be satisfied with occupying a small part of us. He wants ALL of us, and is patient beyond measure, knowing that if we drift away from truth long enough, little by little, our faith in Jesus will eventually simply be head knowledge with no trust involved at all.

Blessings,

Bruce

well said.:clap:
 
Upvote 0

Walter Kovacs

Justice is coming, no matter what we do.
Jan 22, 2011
1,922
91
Florida
Visit site
✟25,124.00
Faith
Christian Seeker
Marital Status
In Relationship
All it does is present an unneeded stumbling block to an unsaved world.

I'd imagine the bigger stumbling block would be when someone believes the Bible to be absolutely 100% error free, finds a couple numerical typos and has their faith shattered because of it, as was the case with Bart Erhman. It's dangerous to put inerrancy at the center of your belief system. But I suspect neither of us will agree here, so I bow out of this discussion.
 
Upvote 0

Zaac

Well-Known Member
Nov 19, 2004
8,430
426
Atlanta, GA.
✟12,748.00
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Single
I'd imagine the bigger stumbling block would be when someone believes the Bible to be absolutely 100% error free,

Why on earth would the absolute truth be a stumbling block to anyone? You're grasping here.^_^

finds a couple numerical typos and has their faith shattered because of it, as was the case with Bart Erhman. It's dangerous to put inerrancy at the center of your belief system. But I suspect neither of us will agree here, so I bow out of this discussion.

Jesus Christ should be at the center of the belief system. And folks should be given the ability to receive what Jesus says as the absolute truth without CHRISTIANS getting in the way and causing them to question the absolute truthfulness of what His word says. Because as I said, you're talking about numbers and typos, but an unsaved world and the enemy will use that as a platform to convince folks to question the absolute truthfulness of God's word just as he did with Adam and Eve. And we know what the end result of that was. And if it is viewed AT ALL as questionable, they will not confess and repent.

Do some of you not want people to come to Christ?:confused:

With all the hindrances for people to receive the Gospel already, what on earth could the motif be for CHRISTIANS to start throwing in another stumbling block?
 
Upvote 0
R

RickardoHolmes

Guest
Brother I pray this does not come across in any way but love but your answer floored me. Have we drifted so far that now the Bible, God's word, is "almost" totally useless?? Are we to believe it is all mythology and historical error. May I ask a question? How in the world can any man truly believe God if he distrusts what God has given us. Faith becomes impossible and thus, pleasing God does as well, for without faith it is impossible (unless, of course, that too is not true!).

Let me be a voice crying out loudly to all here who read this. God's word does not contain some "truth". It is TRUTH. We are not to judge the word of God. It is to judge us. We are to live by every word of it, heed its warnings, be encouraged by its promises, and guard our hearts when satan comes whispering "Hath God said.....?" Jesus fought of the attacks of satan by quoting the word. Shall we be so bold as to think we do not need it. Careful, for we must not underestimate the power of satan to deceive and overestimate ourselves and our wisdom to know truth all by ourselves. God help us.

I have always said there is enough truth to be found in even the Living Bible, a poor paraphrase of the Word, that a man on a desert island, finding one washed up on the beach, would be thoroughly equipped to get saved and make Heaven His home.

The minute we allow doubts and our human logic to take precedance over God's word, God is now under the microscope and we are now God, creating the God we choose.

May God forgive us. We are to live by every word that proceeds out of His mouth. If we find an areas we do not understand, we move on and trust that at the proper time, our God will reveal His truth to our understanding.

We have entered the last time, and men are departing from the faith and giving heed to satan's lies. Paul told us the the word of God is perfectly adequate to equip us to walk in holiness if we will stop judging it and simply obey it, and let it search our hearts and judge us.

God has clearly spoken:

"All scripture is given by inspiration of God, and is profitable for doctrine, for reproof, for correction, for instruction in righteousness."

2 Timothy 3:16

Brother, we have a choice. Either we can believe God is lying here and that it is not inspired at all, or we can choose to submit ourselves to it and ask God to bless us with all it has to offer us, leading us more fully into abiding in Him.

May God open the eyes of His sheep.

Blessings,

Bruce

Well Bruce, I said I would get backj with you and everyone on this thread. I appreciate your patience

Please re-read what I wrote, because I did not say that the Bible was totally useless. This is not a Black and White ....ALL or NOTHING Issue.

First, we appear to have some different opinions in the Origins of the Bible. I do not, and never have, believed that "God gave it to us" Instead, I have shown through much exploration, prayer, and even old fashion research how it came into being. And while parts of it were weritten by persons who were probably and ibviosusly inspired by God, much of it remains myth and allegory. But I will say again, it is the MESSAGE not the story that is important.

For example, I remember my son asking me once if Noah's Arc ever really happened. I explained that no, it did not and could not. Now that he is old enough, we are able to talk about the laws of physics, epecially fluid dynamics and evaporation and condensation and show how a worldwide 40 day flood would have been as impossible then as it is now. (BTW, All major relgions have a flood myth of some type) But what lesson can be learned about man vs nature, about coexistance and about perseverence through that story? the lessons around it are good, even if the story is a myth. Kind of like the Aeosp Fable about the bird who was thirsty and could not reach the water in the bottom of a cup. SO, he took small pebbles in his beak and dropped them, one at a time, into the cup and slowly the water level rose. He continued this until the water level was high enough that he could reach it. So the story ends with a moral that "Little by Little does the trick" (Patience)


My favorite myth from the Bible is the garden of Eden myth. It involves a talking snake, who supposedly walked upright but was for his "sins" , forced to slither sometime thereafter the appearance of humans on the plaent. Of course, everyone knows that snakes have been "Slithering" we know since at least the Cretaceous Period, which was 130 Million years ago. And no, they never evolved vocalizations. Of course we know the importance of this myth in organized Christianity.

Many of the stories, although grounded in myth and lacking any scientific or historical fact, have morals. But not all. Some aspects of the Bible are totally reprehensible, and encourage actions that we as more enlightened humans in the 21st century know better than to follow. Such then is the point I have always made that the Bible is NOT intended as an authority or guide for us.

It is a great look into how a few early Christians worshipped. It is a great look into how early superstitious Romans and Jews interpreted "God"
But since then our understanding of what "God" is has changed and evolved. We know more about life and the Universe and yes, even "God" than 2000 years ago.
Next time you get sick, would you ask your doctor to reference a 2000 year old medical book and use it as a guide to diagnose and treat you? I hope not !!!
So why reference a book that was intended as a reference for early Christians? Why have a relationship with a Book when you can have a relationship God?
And why wrap your whole faith up in a book? Especially when it contains errors? How much more of it is "errant" that we have not yet realized?

And above all else, WHY hold to an ancient Superstitious concept of a god who is humanized, a Super Human with an Ego who demands worship or casts non-believers into Hell? How primitive is that?


Now let me remind you of a couple of items if I could. As far as we know, Jesus never commanded ANYONE to write anything down. We know that after Jesus died, His followers got together and started asking questions and sharing stories. So, after 90 or so years, when those stories could have changed a little, had some embellishments and editing in the retelling, someone put one into writing. We call it the Gospel of Mark. 'Again, we never had a command from Jesus to "use a Bible as a sole basis of faith" (Sola Scriptura) in fact, think about this: Jesus, as a jew, would have been instructed purely in the Oral tradition. And as a laborer, as the son of a carpenter (day laborer) He would have been uneducated and possibly illiterate!!! So what concern would Jesus have had with keeping a book !!!!!
You mentioned a passage of Scripture from 2nd Timothy . Normally I do nto respond to "Verse Mining" because it keeps the Bible totally out of context. To understand the Bible, one must not only read it as a whole, but have an understanding of Jewish, Egyptian and Roman mythology because so much of that influenced early Christianity. but to respon, when that passage was written, there was NO Bible. It did not yet exist. There was no "New Testament" Canon.
So if you are going to apply that to future canon, then do we have to give equal time and countenence to later scriptures, such as the Koran, the Book of Mormon and yikes! the Teachings of Bhagwan Shree Rajneesh? Seriously, The first one I have read, the second one bored me to tears and the third one, well, it misses the mark for me altogether ! And what about scripture such as the Bhagtava Gita? It may have precluded Christ. If Paul said "All Scripture" well I guess that is part of it too. Certainly Buddhist Scripture existed in Christ's time. (Which if you read them you would find amazing similarities to parts of Jesus' teachings)

I guess my final question would be do you put your faith in the words of Paul? Because those are not the Words of God, those are the wrods of man. And what kind of a man was Paul? check out the book Peculier Treasures by Frederick Beauchener. After reading that, you may find it very hard to equate the words of Paul with the Words of God. Remember that when you quote anything Paul said. Paul was about relgion. He was fanatical about his new found religion. And fanatics tend to have more zeal and be a lot more vocal than mystics. But he was not an "enlightened" figure so to speak. He lacked the insight to know that God, being Omniscient and Eternal, will work through all people in His way, not Paul's way. So please to try to keep that in perspective.
Ah but I wander here.
God has never Lied to us. If the Bible contains errors, it is because Humans put them there. And we, by our nature, sometimes make mistakes. We sometimes mess up along the way. Some of us will even admit it when we do. And we may mistakenly equate something for which it is not. Seriously, how could a God, who is universal, omnipotent, perfect and eternal be described in human language by humans who are imperfect, limited and mortal? It cannot be done. Our language and our limited human capacity prevents us from totally understanding God. That is why the descriptions of God from 5000 years ago in Jewish mythology were so humanized. We cannot do it. We can try, and many good books, the Bible, and others may come out of it. There have been many books published which I would say are inspired by God. I do know this. But in the end, they remain the creations and inspirations of humans. After all, that is what we are. And than You God, for giving us Intellegence and Reason. and we look to Christ to elevate us. that is what is meant by the Christ Consciousness. Christhood is that Link with God, that realization of "God Made Flesh" of God "Dwelling amongst us" ..In terms that we as Humans can understand. Christ as God. Think of that for a moment.

Then think of this. Go out tonight, take your telescope and point it at the constellation Orion and find a star called Rho Caseopea. The light you are seeing now reaching our planet left that star 4000 years ago, long before Jesus was born, and is just now reaching us. And here's the fun part. God is just as much there and then as He is here and Now. THAT is AMAZING !!!! and within that cluster of Stars, are planets. And some of those planets may have life on them. and that Life, the essence of all that is Living in the Universe, is God. God is there too.
 
Upvote 0

cubinity

jesus is; the rest is commentary.
Jun 11, 2010
3,171
403
✟27,590.00
Faith
Agnostic
Marital Status
Private
Which has more authority: the Bible, or the Lord of the Bible?

For which do we receive salvation: the Bible, or the Lord of the Bible?

This is what the Lord of the Bible, as recorded in the Bible, had to say of those who exaggerated the role of the Bible...

"You study the Scriptures diligently because you think that in them you have eternal life. These are the very Scriptures that testify about me, yet you refuse to come to me to have life." - John 5:39-40

The Bible may or may not be whatever. That is inconsequential.

What matters is that Jesus is Lord and Savior, and that we go to him to have life.
 
Upvote 0

Zaac

Well-Known Member
Nov 19, 2004
8,430
426
Atlanta, GA.
✟12,748.00
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Single
Which has more authority: the Bible, or the Lord of the Bible?

For which do we receive salvation: the Bible, or the Lord of the Bible?

This is what the Lord of the Bible, as recorded in the Bible, had to say of those who exaggerated the role of the Bible...

"You study the Scriptures diligently because you think that in them you have eternal life. These are the very Scriptures that testify about me, yet you refuse to come to me to have life." - John 5:39-40

The Bible may or may not be whatever. That is inconsequential.

What matters is that Jesus is Lord and Savior, and that we go to him to have life.

:confused: Again, where exactly do yall think people found out about this Lord from?
 
Upvote 0

cubinity

jesus is; the rest is commentary.
Jun 11, 2010
3,171
403
✟27,590.00
Faith
Agnostic
Marital Status
Private
:confused: Again, where exactly do yall think people found out about this Lord from?

We find out about the Lord from the Bible, granted.

However, we also find out about Troy from the Illiad, but that doesn't make the Illiad inerrant any more than finding out about Jesus from the Bible makes the Bible inerrant. Straw man. Try again.
 
Upvote 0
G

gideons300

Guest
Well Bruce, I said I would get backj with you and everyone on this thread. I appreciate your patience

Please re-read what I wrote, because I did not say that the Bible was totally useless. This is not a Black and White ....ALL or NOTHING Issue.

First, we appear to have some different opinions in the Origins of the Bible. I do not, and never have, believed that "God gave it to us" Instead, I have shown through much exploration, prayer, and even old fashion research how it came into being. And while parts of it were weritten by persons who were probably and ibviosusly inspired by God, much of it remains myth and allegory. But I will say again, it is the MESSAGE not the story that is important.

For example, I remember my son asking me once if Noah's Arc ever really happened. I explained that no, it did not and could not. Now that he is old enough, we are able to talk about the laws of physics, epecially fluid dynamics and evaporation and condensation and show how a worldwide 40 day flood would have been as impossible then as it is now. (BTW, All major relgions have a flood myth of some type) But what lesson can be learned about man vs nature, about coexistance and about perseverence through that story? the lessons around it are good, even if the story is a myth. Kind of like the Aeosp Fable about the bird who was thirsty and could not reach the water in the bottom of a cup. SO, he took small pebbles in his beak and dropped them, one at a time, into the cup and slowly the water level rose. He continued this until the water level was high enough that he could reach it. So the story ends with a moral that "Little by Little does the trick" (Patience)


My favorite myth from the Bible is the garden of Eden myth. It involves a talking snake, who supposedly walked upright but was for his "sins" , forced to slither sometime thereafter the appearance of humans on the plaent. Of course, everyone knows that snakes have been "Slithering" we know since at least the Cretaceous Period, which was 130 Million years ago. And no, they never evolved vocalizations. Of course we know the importance of this myth in organized Christianity.

Many of the stories, although grounded in myth and lacking any scientific or historical fact, have morals. But not all. Some aspects of the Bible are totally reprehensible, and encourage actions that we as more enlightened humans in the 21st century know better than to follow. Such then is the point I have always made that the Bible is NOT intended as an authority or guide for us.

It is a great look into how a few early Christians worshipped. It is a great look into how early superstitious Romans and Jews interpreted "God"
But since then our understanding of what "God" is has changed and evolved. We know more about life and the Universe and yes, even "God" than 2000 years ago.
Next time you get sick, would you ask your doctor to reference a 2000 year old medical book and use it as a guide to diagnose and treat you? I hope not !!!
So why reference a book that was intended as a reference for early Christians? Why have a relationship with a Book when you can have a relationship God?
And why wrap your whole faith up in a book? Especially when it contains errors? How much more of it is "errant" that we have not yet realized?

And above all else, WHY hold to an ancient Superstitious concept of a god who is humanized, a Super Human with an Ego who demands worship or casts non-believers into Hell? How primitive is that?


Now let me remind you of a couple of items if I could. As far as we know, Jesus never commanded ANYONE to write anything down. We know that after Jesus died, His followers got together and started asking questions and sharing stories. So, after 90 or so years, when those stories could have changed a little, had some embellishments and editing in the retelling, someone put one into writing. We call it the Gospel of Mark. 'Again, we never had a command from Jesus to "use a Bible as a sole basis of faith" (Sola Scriptura) in fact, think about this: Jesus, as a jew, would have been instructed purely in the Oral tradition. And as a laborer, as the son of a carpenter (day laborer) He would have been uneducated and possibly illiterate!!! So what concern would Jesus have had with keeping a book !!!!!
You mentioned a passage of Scripture from 2nd Timothy . Normally I do nto respond to "Verse Mining" because it keeps the Bible totally out of context. To understand the Bible, one must not only read it as a whole, but have an understanding of Jewish, Egyptian and Roman mythology because so much of that influenced early Christianity. but to respon, when that passage was written, there was NO Bible. It did not yet exist. There was no "New Testament" Canon.
So if you are going to apply that to future canon, then do we have to give equal time and countenence to later scriptures, such as the Koran, the Book of Mormon and yikes! the Teachings of Bhagwan Shree Rajneesh? Seriously, The first one I have read, the second one bored me to tears and the third one, well, it misses the mark for me altogether ! And what about scripture such as the Bhagtava Gita? It may have precluded Christ. If Paul said "All Scripture" well I guess that is part of it too. Certainly Buddhist Scripture existed in Christ's time. (Which if you read them you would find amazing similarities to parts of Jesus' teachings)

I guess my final question would be do you put your faith in the words of Paul? Because those are not the Words of God, those are the wrods of man. And what kind of a man was Paul? check out the book Peculier Treasures by Frederick Beauchener. After reading that, you may find it very hard to equate the words of Paul with the Words of God. Remember that when you quote anything Paul said. Paul was about relgion. He was fanatical about his new found religion. And fanatics tend to have more zeal and be a lot more vocal than mystics. But he was not an "enlightened" figure so to speak. He lacked the insight to know that God, being Omniscient and Eternal, will work through all people in His way, not Paul's way. So please to try to keep that in perspective.
Ah but I wander here.
God has never Lied to us. If the Bible contains errors, it is because Humans put them there. And we, by our nature, sometimes make mistakes. We sometimes mess up along the way. Some of us will even admit it when we do. And we may mistakenly equate something for which it is not. Seriously, how could a God, who is universal, omnipotent, perfect and eternal be described in human language by humans who are imperfect, limited and mortal? It cannot be done. Our language and our limited human capacity prevents us from totally understanding God. That is why the descriptions of God from 5000 years ago in Jewish mythology were so humanized. We cannot do it. We can try, and many good books, the Bible, and others may come out of it. There have been many books published which I would say are inspired by God. I do know this. But in the end, they remain the creations and inspirations of humans. After all, that is what we are. And than You God, for giving us Intellegence and Reason. and we look to Christ to elevate us. that is what is meant by the Christ Consciousness. Christhood is that Link with God, that realization of "God Made Flesh" of God "Dwelling amongst us" ..In terms that we as Humans can understand. Christ as God. Think of that for a moment.

Then think of this. Go out tonight, take your telescope and point it at the constellation Orion and find a star called Rho Caseopea. The light you are seeing now reaching our planet left that star 4000 years ago, long before Jesus was born, and is just now reaching us. And here's the fun part. God is just as much there and then as He is here and Now. THAT is AMAZING !!!! and within that cluster of Stars, are planets. And some of those planets may have life on them. and that Life, the essence of all that is Living in the Universe, is God. God is there too.
Brother, here is the problem as I see it. We have to take care to not eat of the tree of the knowledge of good and evil, and in essence, our minds dictate to us what God is like, and what He can or can't do, will and won't do. In essence, our God becomes our mind. I mean no disrespect, but ultimately, we have a choice. Believe and honor God or doubt and reap the consequences. I agree there are many peripheral subject in the Bible that are not truly key to the message of salvation, either way.

But the core issues of the gospel is critical that we accept and believe. For these, there is no "wiggle room" in our faith. Unbelief is no longer a weakness once we are brought into the light. It is called an evil heart of unbelief. It is sin, and the unbelievers will have their lot cast with the wicked.

My I ask you clearly three questions so that I have no false assumptions in any further discussions? I appreciate you kindness in the discussions so far. Thank you.

Is Jesus the Messiah, and did His blood buy us back from our sins and fallen nature.

Is he the only way to the Father and the only begotten son of the Father?

Are all others theives and robbers who say one can get to Heaven any other way?

If Adam and Eve is a myth and Noah's ark never existed, these belief,s either way, will not save or condemn a man. But the three questions I asked do have direct relevance to the final state of our soul. I await your answer.

Blessings, Bruce
 
Upvote 0

Zaac

Well-Known Member
Nov 19, 2004
8,430
426
Atlanta, GA.
✟12,748.00
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Single
We find out about the Lord from the Bible, granted.

Ignoring the rest of the comment and sticking with what is on subject.

Yes you did find out about the Lord from the Bible. If you are a Christian, you must have trusted at one point that what the Bible says about Him is true.

So why not start picking and choosing which parts are to be trusted as truth and which are not?

This sort of thinking does nothing but open the door again for truth to be subjective to man's whims.

folks do try hard to get on God's throne.^_^
 
Upvote 0

Zaac

Well-Known Member
Nov 19, 2004
8,430
426
Atlanta, GA.
✟12,748.00
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Single
The Greatest Commandment is something inerrant. It is called Love. It is What God is was and always will be.

You would have no idea that God is love absent His Holy word. You'd have no idea about a Greatest Commandment absent His Holy word.

So either it is all absolutely true or this faith in a God whom yall say has saved you means NOTHING.
 
Upvote 0

cubinity

jesus is; the rest is commentary.
Jun 11, 2010
3,171
403
✟27,590.00
Faith
Agnostic
Marital Status
Private
Ignoring the rest of the comment and sticking with what is on subject.

The rest of the comment, and not this point, was actually the part that was on topic. Folks, try to remember that the topic is the inerrancy of Scripture, not whether or not it is how we find out about something or another.

Yes you did find out about the Lord from the Bible. If you are a Christian, you must have trusted at one point that what the Bible says about Him is true.

Right. At one point I trusted that what the Bible said about him was true. That trust was my choice (or whim) to make, and that trust was contained to this isolated topic. My choice was not a proof of any kind that the text actually was true, or that the text was true about any other topic.

So why not start picking and choosing which parts are to be trusted as truth and which are not?

We all pick and choose as you've described. They are our beliefs. It is absolutely our choice what we choose to believe and not believe. No external standard has any power over this. It is called free-will. It is not detestable, but beautiful. It is the very thing that empowers us to choose to approach Jesus to receive eternal life. I don't see what the problem is.

This sort of thinking does nothing but open the door again for truth to be subjective to man's whims.

Not truth, but certainly choice. Furthermore, what door? What slippery slope? What danger? If the Bible is true, then our choice to believe it is inerrant or not has absolutely no bearing on anything. It is inconsequential, so what's the problem?

Paul says Scripture is God breathed, and from that axiom he does not make the leap that it is inerrant, but only that it is USEFUL. If Paul wasn't willing to make this leap, then why should I?

folks do try hard to get on God's throne.^_^

What? God is on God's throne. I'm content hanging out in the crowd of worshipers at His feet.
 
Upvote 0
Status
Not open for further replies.