• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

  • CF has always been a site that welcomes people from different backgrounds and beliefs to participate in discussion and even debate. That is the nature of its ministry. In view of recent events emotions are running very high. We need to remind people of some basic principles in debating on this site. We need to be civil when we express differences in opinion. No personal attacks. Avoid you, your statements. Don't characterize an entire political party with comparisons to Fascism or Communism or other extreme movements that committed atrocities. CF is not the place for broad brush or blanket statements about groups and political parties. Put the broad brushes and blankets away when you come to CF, better yet, put them in the incinerator. Debate had no place for them. We need to remember that people that commit acts of violence represent themselves or a small extreme faction.

The best evidence for Creationism

Status
Not open for further replies.

Wiccan_Child

Contributor
Mar 21, 2005
19,419
673
Bristol, UK
✟46,731.00
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
In Relationship
Politics
UK-Liberal-Democrats
I am not only insane, I am also reading the christian bible each and every day. It is the patterns of the rainbow making me marvel, and can't understand how laws of physics create it. To me physical explination of the rainbow is pure nonsense. But you can always try to talk sense to me...
The laws are complicated, but they work.

Imagine you're standing in a wide field. The Sun is behind you, and a sheet of rain is in front of you (you're basically on the boundary of the rain). It's light is streaming from behind your head to your front.

Raindrops are spherical. When light enters them, it refracts off the back and comes back out the front again - the raindrops act like little mirrors. But, they don't reflect it back perfectly, they do it like so:

Rainbow_single_reflection.svg


In reality, there would be incident rays (that is, rays of light coming from the Sun) hitting from the top to the bottom of the raindrop. But, for simplicity, only half the rays are shown - those that come in to the top half of the raindrop. When the rays hit the back, they bounce around in that complicated way and then stream outwards.

When this happens to many raindrops at once, they basically end up turning the light from the Sun back around, and spreading it outwards in a cone. This separates the light according to its wavelength, and so we see a circle of light appear in the sky. Since the circle is centred on the ground, we only see the top half - the rainbow.

Does that make sense?
 
Upvote 0

Loudmouth

Contributor
Aug 26, 2003
51,417
6,143
Visit site
✟98,025.00
Faith
Agnostic
Another example is if we collect the data of which I was within the experimental group. - The following words cured me "I bind you the spirit of accusation in the name of Jesus". That was the experiment which shows two things, evil spirits do exist, and it shows that the afflicted can be healed from it.

Has anyone run this experiment?

If people are not healed by this incantation does this mean that God does not exist?
 
Upvote 0

Loudmouth

Contributor
Aug 26, 2003
51,417
6,143
Visit site
✟98,025.00
Faith
Agnostic
For creation, we can observe that the rainbow is there. And Noa is within the experimental group, what he observed was a coventant God made to all mankind, that He (God) will not destroy all living through another flood. The rainbow is there to observe for everyone. It an be tested (spray water before a light) and it can be retested (spray once again with water infront of a light bulb). It is there for everyone to observe. If I choose to break my own faith, It could be twisted into a science in one way or another. Not even the most fundamental scientist would disagree, Faith can be explained by science!!!

Wow. Just . . . wow.

Tell me if you think this is a convincing argument. Leprechauns created rainbows. We see rainbows. Therefore, Leprechauns are real. Are you convinced that Leprechauns are real?
 
Upvote 0

Loudmouth

Contributor
Aug 26, 2003
51,417
6,143
Visit site
✟98,025.00
Faith
Agnostic
I am not certain what a leprechauns is? But the rainbow has a pattern, it is a bow and even though the caotic moisture in the air after a rainfall, it still shows seperate colours in form of a pattern.

So how does that evidence the existence of a supernatural deity?
 
Upvote 0
L

Lillen

Guest
Tell me if you think this is a convincing argument. Leprechauns created rainbows. We see rainbows. Therefore, Leprechauns are real. Are you convinced that Leprechauns are real?

Let me ask this question in return. If leprechauns supposingly would have created the rainbows, it would actually be an evidence for their existance, no!!? Now the bible gives record that God did it. Thus it is a evidence that He exist!
 
Upvote 0

Loudmouth

Contributor
Aug 26, 2003
51,417
6,143
Visit site
✟98,025.00
Faith
Agnostic
Let me ask this question in return. If leprechauns supposingly would have created the rainbows, it would actually be an evidence for their existance, no!!? Now the bible gives record that God did it. Thus it is a evidence that He exist!

The Bible CLAIMS that God did it. That is a claim, not evidence. Do you understand the difference between a claim and evidence?
 
Upvote 0

AV1611VET

SCIENCE CAN TAKE A HIKE
Site Supporter
Jun 18, 2006
3,856,285
52,673
Guam
✟5,161,921.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
Upvote 0
L

Lillen

Guest
The Bible CLAIMS that God did it. That is a claim, not evidence. Do you understand the difference between a claim and evidence?

I guess you are about to enlighten me, or!?

The Bible CLAIMS that God did it. That is a claim, not evidence. Do you understand the difference between a claim and evidence?

And you claim that meduza did it.
 
Upvote 0

KhaosTheory

Well-Known Member
Oct 27, 2011
542
15
✟828.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
In Relationship
Upvote 0
L

Lillen

Guest
No, the otherway around, placebo has a prayer effect. The doctors proffessing placebo treatment have an exaggeratted wish of feeling proffessional. In the end few doctors have so high influence on the afflicted so that the afflicted simply could rise up and walk. With guidance from the scriptuers anyone can get healed through faith in Jesus. From what so ever afflictions.
 
Upvote 0
Status
Not open for further replies.