C
CredoBiblicist
Guest
Does anyone here own or use one of these?
I've had limited contact with the Amplified Bible in my walk. Recently I was looking at purchasing a 4 translation parallel Bible and the Amplified was the 4th one in it which lead me to check it out online. I was expecting it to be pretty bad with all the "amplifications" but was actually surprised. Yes it's awkward to read, doesn't flow great and should never be used as your main Bible. But at least it's seeking to bring out the full meaning of the Hebrew and Greek and when used to supplement a good literal version, it seems to be a good study tool. I wouldn't call it a word for word translation (it can paraphrase a little at times in the amps which you'll notice)but it seems to be a lot more accurate and faithful to the originals than current popular versions like the NLT, CEV and the Message. Seems a shame that the latter 3 are used much more.
Literalness is the most important thing to me when it comes to translation philosophy and while the Amplified Bible isn't going to be first in that category (though is a project of the Lockman Foundation who publish the excellent literal NASB), it offers something different from a word to word translation and a paraphrase. I will take faithfulness to the Hebrew and Greek over readability any day and for the Amplified seeking to do that it gets the thumbs up from me.
My 2 cents.
I've had limited contact with the Amplified Bible in my walk. Recently I was looking at purchasing a 4 translation parallel Bible and the Amplified was the 4th one in it which lead me to check it out online. I was expecting it to be pretty bad with all the "amplifications" but was actually surprised. Yes it's awkward to read, doesn't flow great and should never be used as your main Bible. But at least it's seeking to bring out the full meaning of the Hebrew and Greek and when used to supplement a good literal version, it seems to be a good study tool. I wouldn't call it a word for word translation (it can paraphrase a little at times in the amps which you'll notice)but it seems to be a lot more accurate and faithful to the originals than current popular versions like the NLT, CEV and the Message. Seems a shame that the latter 3 are used much more.
Literalness is the most important thing to me when it comes to translation philosophy and while the Amplified Bible isn't going to be first in that category (though is a project of the Lockman Foundation who publish the excellent literal NASB), it offers something different from a word to word translation and a paraphrase. I will take faithfulness to the Hebrew and Greek over readability any day and for the Amplified seeking to do that it gets the thumbs up from me.
My 2 cents.