Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
Where did you present evidence that the biblical claims are true?
Let's take it easy on the personal jibes.Any you whine
I believe that the cosmos exists as well, I just call it the cosmos, and see no indication that it gives a care about a thin film of biological activity on this rock we call Earth.I hate to break it to you but the "God" that I believe exists is quite "visible' during the night and during the day, <snip yet another false dichotomy>
Let's take it easy on the personal jibes.
I believe that the cosmos exists as well, I just call it the cosmos, and see no indication that it gives a care about a thin film of biological activity on this rock we call Earth.
The Spider-man fallacy:http://www.bible-history.com/jerusalem/firstcenturyjerusalem_pool_of_siloam.html
http://www.biblicalarchaeology.org/daily/biblical-sites-places/jerusalem/hezekiah’s-tunnel-reexamined/
Demonstrating that parts of the bible have already been historically verified is *trivially* easy these days. Where have you been?
I have made no such defence, I have only pointed out where you have made misrepresentations. You are free to substantiate your version of events at any time.Yet there you are defending a claim
Look, it's a mermaid on Mars! Or is that Bigfoot?
I have made no such defence, I have only pointed out where you have made misrepresentations. You are free to substantiate your version of events at any time.
Look, it's a mermaid on Mars! Or is that Bigfoot?
...no gods......
Lot's of imagination, but sadly no Hawking Radiation, no Dark Matter, no Dark Energy, no Black Holes,
Indeed. Follow the evidence.no Gravity Waves, waving - and still nothing detected. I'd say the only physical insight that has been gained is that they do not exist. Except of course in the imagination....
I have made no such defence, I have only pointed out where you have made misrepresentations. You are free to substantiate your version of events at any time.
Look, it's a mermaid on Mars! Or is that Bigfoot?
Indeed. Follow the evidence.
then you should make it a point to substantiate these "facts" of yours.I haven't made any misrepresentations, I've simply pointed out the facts.
I only quoted him, for accuracy. Have you not claimed to be familiar with the facts that Hawking uses?You have no empirical facts that support Hawking's version of events,
No one seems cares about this particular god of yours, except for you. It's boring.It's fascinating to me how flippant you and other atheists are towards a purely *empirical* definition of God,
then you should make it a point to substantiate these "facts" of yours.
I only quoted him, for accuracy. Have you not claimed to be familiar with the facts that Hawking uses?
No one seems cares about this particular god of yours, except for you. It's boring.
Nothing for the biblical-type gods?
That's as productive as posting it here.
Best to make that substantiation with each claim of how you think mainstream cosmology works.That's why I just posted that link to the Thunderbolts thread
You are welcome to your opinions.The 'facts'
Are they not the same thing all of a sudden? You switched gods on me too fast there.I don't find God or the physical universe to be boring in the least.
Gods that cannot be shown to exist are boring. Observing the vast and intricate, often conflicting rationales for why these gods are indistinguishable from nothing can be fascinating.Boredom is apparently your problem, not mine.
Best to make that substantiation with each claim of how you think mainstream cosmology works.
You are welcome to your opinions.
Are they not the same thing all of a sudden? You switched gods on me too fast there.
Gods that cannot be shown to exist are boring.
Observing the vast and intricate, often conflicting rationales for why these gods are indistinguishable from nothing can be fascinating.
An emphasis on the patterns perceived by experts suggests that pattern recognition is an important strategy for helping students develop confidence and competence. These patterns provide triggering conditions for accessing knowledge that is relevant to a task." (From "How People Learn")
Of course I can.If you notice my claim was from a book by the author of "The China Study". To be sure reductionism has huge commercial support and billions of dollars are made with its seductive logic but there is very little evidence that individuals components have any value at all. It is the sum total that makes the difference. Not the minute detail.I have made no claims, so I have to defend nothing. If you make claims, expect people to ask you to support them.
Can you handle that?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?