The age of Rocks

[L'Anatra]

Let's see. You rely on the Talkorigins web site, even after I point out it's fallicies and circularity, whereas I used the magnetic field, the shrinking sun, the receeding moon, the erosion of continents, the global flood legends, and numerous other evidences, yet I didn't use any evidence?

You've pointed out "fallacies" and yet you have not given any reason as to why they are. It's been explained time and again to you that the magnetic field is not decreasing in strength (as a whole) and that the other pieces of "evidence" you have used are faulty.

If Evolution's a religion, why hasn't it been thrown out as a bad theory? NOWHERE does the Geologic Column exist, that you worship (It's your Bible, but who wants to carry a 100-mile-tall pile of rocks?). Numerous finds destroy it, such as the pictures of dinosaurs, Ica stones, Dragon legends, etc.

You are lying.

 

[Dr.GH]

NOWHERE does the Geologic Column exist, that you worship (It's your Bible, but who wants to carry a 100-mile-tall pile of rocks?).

None "worship" the global geological sequence. You are merely a rude child. But, all the major components/strata of the geological column do exist in their proper order in many places around the world. From "The Geologic Column and Its Implications to the Flood".

 

[gunglepus]

Please excuse my ignorance of geology. I saw a doco the other day where someone was speaking of a rock in Australia thought to be over 4 billion years old. Now i know plate techtonics is a slow process, but 4 billion years is a very long time. Wouldn't every part of the Earth have been subducted and re-extruded many times over such a long period?

Continental crust tends to FLOAT on top of the mantle because it is lighter. So what happens when plates collide can be seen in south asia with india ploughng into asia. It throws up big new mountains. The top of Mt Everest was orginally seafloor sediments.