S
Sectio Aurea
Guest
What! only two options?
Elio, your reasoning (with respect to your statement above) demontrates and reinforces the typical negative Christian stereotype of debasing family values.
Upvote
0
Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
"Everyone either loves themselves, or loves God. Those who love themselves will have themselves as company forever. Those who love God will have God as company forever."
Irrelevant for what´s been discussed and pompous, on top.
You're Christ?!
If you hate Christ you hate me.
That was my main point. You presume, believe, trust that one day science will give us an answer regarding what caused the universe to come into existence based on what science has given us thus far.
This is what is called methodological naturalism which falls under philosophical naturalism.
But it is my contention that metaphysical naturalism is demonstrably fallacious and self defeating. I can also defend my position if you would like to debate me on it.
Isn´t it funny how you insist on being presented arguments by affirmative atheists, and once you are presented them you reject to consider them because...the guy making them is an affirmative atheist?
Surely you will say:
"Well I hate Odin, does that mean Odin exists?"
Very pompous. Claiming that you're a victim of hatred because there are people who don't share your religion...Irrelevant for what´s been discussed and pompous, on top.
Elioenai has a habit of attributing theist logic to atheists and then shooting it down, thereby hurting his own stance. It's one of the strangest forms of straw men that I've ever seen.Hands up - has any atheist actually said this? Let's test just how far we can trust confident assertions from this particular poster.
Actually, everything is about whether or not men and women are going to live righteously or unrighteously in this life.
You said, "I have already demonstrated to you why ignosticism, theological non-congnitivism is self defeating and has been abandoned"Logical positivism is dead.
What more can I say?
Because they are not the same things.If it was abandoned by the philosophic community and openly repudiated by one of its most vocal proponents after he realized it was self-defeating, why do you keep asking me to provide a positive ontology?
So what is the point of this debate with Paradoxum?That would be a waste of time for me.
So what is the point of this debate with Paradoxum?
If his posts don't seem structured, it's because he has to spend half his time pointing out your contradictions and lies about your previous statements.So I for the time being, shall just ignore you until you are ready to defend your views in a structured format.
To establish a premise that would lead to that question, one would first have to ask "Is there a 'why?'" And "What evidence is there to suggest that there is or isn't a 'why?'"The most sublime question anyone could ever ask is: Why is there something rather than nothing?
Begin there...
If his posts don't seem structured, it's because he has to spend half his time pointing out your contradictions and lies about your previous statements.
If his posts don't seem structured, it's because he has to spend half his time pointing out your contradictions and lies about your previous statements.
To establish a premise that would lead to that question, one would first have to ask "Is there a 'why?'" And "What evidence is there to suggest that there is or isn't a 'why?'"
Then you've already lost.If I contradict myself in the debate or lie, I lose the debate. Simple.
But he will not debate me.
Will you?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?