• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

  • CF has always been a site that welcomes people from different backgrounds and beliefs to participate in discussion and even debate. That is the nature of its ministry. In view of recent events emotions are running very high. We need to remind people of some basic principles in debating on this site. We need to be civil when we express differences in opinion. No personal attacks. Avoid you, your statements. Don't characterize an entire political party with comparisons to Fascism or Communism or other extreme movements that committed atrocities. CF is not the place for broad brush or blanket statements about groups and political parties. Put the broad brushes and blankets away when you come to CF, better yet, put them in the incinerator. Debate had no place for them. We need to remember that people that commit acts of violence represent themselves or a small extreme faction.

The 4 accounts of the Resurrection

TomZzyzx

Newbie
Mar 23, 2011
857
41
✟24,184.00
Faith
Calvary Chapel
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
The Nihilist said:
Actually, on reviewing some different translations, I'm not convinced they are contradictory accounts. Matthew's seems to have some flair that Mark's doesn't, but that's about it.
Why are you concerned about making them line up? The bible is full of contradictions, none of which are insurmountable problems for christianity.

I'm glad to hear that you now agree with me on Matthew and Mark's accounts. My concern was with some people misrepresenting the bible. I can see how some people think the bible is full of contradictions when they are not honest and misrepresent what the bible says.
 
Upvote 0

The Nihilist

Contributor
Sep 14, 2006
6,074
490
✟31,289.00
Faith
Atheist
I'm glad to hear that you now agree with me on Matthew and Mark's accounts. My concern was with some people misrepresenting the bible. I can see how some people think the bible is full of contradictions when they are not honest and misrepresent what the bible says.
Genesis 1 and 2 disagree on whether people were made before animals. There are two accounts of Jesus's lineage that are completely different. Pauls says faith, Matthew's last judgment says works.

Here's a list: A List Of Biblical Contradictions

In general, these contradictions are trivial. Why do you think they matter?
 
Upvote 0

ivebeenshown

Expert invisible poster and thread killer
Apr 27, 2010
7,073
623
✟32,740.00
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Married
It's hard to attribute some of the differing Gospel accounts to personal perspective. In Mark, Luke, and John, the first appearance of the resurrected Jesus to 11 disciples together is in a room in Jerusalem. In Matthew, Jesus's first appearance to the 11 is on a mountain in Galilee. Those locations are, maybe 70 miles apart. To me, personal perspective would be one witness to a hit-and-run saying the victim was struck by a dark blue Escalade, while another witness says he was hit by a black Navigator. But those Bible accounts are like one witness saying the hit-and-run occurred in Chicago, and another saying it happened in Racine. That's a lot more than personal perspective.
I wouldn't say that personal perspective is the be all end all of discrepancies in the bible, though it is possible that personal perspective can include poor memory of events due to old age. :D For example, maybe Jesus did tell them to assemble at the mount, as well as appearing to them in Galilee. In any event, the Catholic faith does not hinge upon where it was that Jesus met the Apostles after the resurrection, only that he did.

I like The Nihilist's approach. Trivial discrepancies!
 
Upvote 0