-
Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
Text too wide for my browser.
- Thread starter OldWiseGuy
- Start date
NorrinRadd
Xian, Biblicist, Fideist, Pneumatic, Antinomian
- Sep 2, 2007
- 5,571
- 595
- Faith
- Charismatic
- Marital Status
- Single
- Politics
- US-Republican
I confirm that the "Moody" skin fixes the problem for me. Haven't tried any others.
Upvote
0
Lindon Tinuviel
Well-Known Member
- Nov 19, 2002
- 3,551
- 109
- 57
- Faith
- Christian
- Marital Status
- In Relationship
- Politics
- US-Others
Upvote
0
sk8Joyful
Well-Known Member
For this entire past week, "White-skies" 
skin worked really well, solving this problem.
Today the past 6 hours, not on viewing - but replying, the Right-side of the screen is opening up again,
and the horizontal-scrollie is stuck so a couple of words are no longer accessable.
Just reporting here, in case someone is working this challenge to resolve.
skin worked really well, solving this problem.Today the past 6 hours, not on viewing - but replying, the Right-side of the screen is opening up again,
and the horizontal-scrollie is stuck so a couple of words are no longer accessable.
Just reporting here, in case someone is working this challenge to resolve.
Upvote
0
NorrinRadd
Xian, Biblicist, Fideist, Pneumatic, Antinomian
- Sep 2, 2007
- 5,571
- 595
- Faith
- Charismatic
- Marital Status
- Single
- Politics
- US-Republican
I'm currently seeing this bug in the "Upgrade Task List 5/22/08" Announcement.
My screen res is 1024 x 768
Browser is Mozilla Firefox 2.0.0.14
CF "skin" is "CF2 in the Moody Sky"
My screen res is 1024 x 768
Browser is Mozilla Firefox 2.0.0.14
CF "skin" is "CF2 in the Moody Sky"
Upvote
0
NorrinRadd
Xian, Biblicist, Fideist, Pneumatic, Antinomian
- Sep 2, 2007
- 5,571
- 595
- Faith
- Charismatic
- Marital Status
- Single
- Politics
- US-Republican
Upvote
0
NorrinRadd
Xian, Biblicist, Fideist, Pneumatic, Antinomian
- Sep 2, 2007
- 5,571
- 595
- Faith
- Charismatic
- Marital Status
- Single
- Politics
- US-Republican
Upvote
0
NorrinRadd
Xian, Biblicist, Fideist, Pneumatic, Antinomian
- Sep 2, 2007
- 5,571
- 595
- Faith
- Charismatic
- Marital Status
- Single
- Politics
- US-Republican
In this thread, the second page is too wide.
More strangely, if I click on the "Quote" link to reply to post #6, I get a page that is way too wide.
More strangely, if I click on the "Quote" link to reply to post #6, I get a page that is way too wide.
Upvote
0
sk8Joyful
Well-Known Member
We were asked which "screen resolution" we use? -
No clue how to get that info.
Browser is Mozilla Firefox, the latest.
CF skin is "CF2 in the White Sky"
Once again, most of the R-side wandering is only 1/2-inch at most, well within the blue border.
So, reading & responding is no problem, today. I hope it stays this way.
No clue how to get that info.
Browser is Mozilla Firefox, the latest.
CF skin is "CF2 in the White Sky"
Once again, most of the R-side wandering is only 1/2-inch at most, well within the blue border.
So, reading & responding is no problem, today. I hope it stays this way.
Upvote
0
sk8Joyful
Well-Known Member
Sometimes, the scrollie-bar can - Not contain the screen's width.
SirAdrian
asked us to supply "screenshots", where the R-screen stretches... over 3-5 inches.
one I just encountered today: http://christianforums.com/tracker.php?itemid=319,
the Bug-report called major Poll problems. I will post the others as I come across them.
THANK you! for getting these challenges resolved
Annie
SirAdrian
one I just encountered today: http://christianforums.com/tracker.php?itemid=319,
the Bug-report called major Poll problems. I will post the others as I come across them.
THANK you! for getting these challenges resolved
Annie
Upvote
0
SirAdrian
Senior Member
- May 14, 2008
- 595
- 55
- Faith
- Christian
- Marital Status
- Married
- Politics
- CA-Liberals
There isn't much we can do for this one.
Basically, with the ads and the enormous avatar & user titles, it's just too much information to display. I'll try to talk with the staff and look at reducing these, but I doubt it will happen. The best we could do is prevent the user info bar above posts from breaking the layout, but that leaves no guarantee the post content itself won't do it.
Basically, with the ads and the enormous avatar & user titles, it's just too much information to display. I'll try to talk with the staff and look at reducing these, but I doubt it will happen. The best we could do is prevent the user info bar above posts from breaking the layout, but that leaves no guarantee the post content itself won't do it.
Upvote
0
NorrinRadd
Xian, Biblicist, Fideist, Pneumatic, Antinomian
- Sep 2, 2007
- 5,571
- 595
- Faith
- Charismatic
- Marital Status
- Single
- Politics
- US-Republican
I don't recall this happening with the "old" CF.
That being the case, how is the "new" CF an "improvement"?
That being the case, how is the "new" CF an "improvement"?
Upvote
0
sk8Joyful
Well-Known Member
SirAdrian
There isn't much we can do for this one.
Basically, with the ads and the enormous avatar & user titles, it's just too much information to display.
Were those Features to "blame", then EACH window would have that challenge.
But clearly that is not the case. Mostly, it's in the "REPLY-box", where the R-screen stretches... over FIVE inches.
There isn't much we can do for this one.
Basically, with the ads and the enormous avatar & user titles, it's just too much information to display.
Were those Features to "blame", then EACH window would have that challenge.
But clearly that is not the case. Mostly, it's in the "REPLY-box", where the R-screen stretches... over FIVE inches.
Upvote
0
sk8Joyful
Well-Known Member
also, I just Noticed: "2.0.0: Text too wide for my browser. Correction: Will Not Fix"
Please explain: is it that you WILL not fix it; or you, whoever programming, can NOT?
This challenge has vascillated back, & forth. Some days, it's almost gone; only to return again,
according to people continuing... to post here. Evidently changes... exist
It seems, your challenge is to Figure out > HOW to KEEP the "corrections" when they occur <
Programming must be *fun*, eh? Makes sense? hopefully Good... sense
Please explain: is it that you WILL not fix it; or you, whoever programming, can NOT?
This challenge has vascillated back, & forth. Some days, it's almost gone; only to return again,
according to people continuing... to post here. Evidently changes... exist
It seems, your challenge is to Figure out > HOW to KEEP the "corrections" when they occur <
Programming must be *fun*, eh?
Makes sense? hopefully Good... sense
Upvote
0
sk8Joyful
Well-Known Member
This entire page is challenged: http://christianforums.com/showthread.php?t=6791249&page=30
Upvote
0
sk8Joyful
Well-Known Member
(I did this once too, and Notice day2day also just stuck her need in the wrong Report;
so can you Move&Address her's in the right bug-report)
At any rate, this "page format is too wide" BUG, is reverting to BAD
And I wonder - are we gonna need to $buy a LARGER-size monitor$ (bizarre), just to READ... at CF.
SirAdrian - surely Alternatives exist on CF. Please check into such further. Thanks!
so can you Move&Address her's in the right bug-report)
At any rate, this "page format is too wide" BUG, is reverting to BAD
And I wonder - are we gonna need to $buy a LARGER-size monitor$ (bizarre), just to READ... at CF.
SirAdrian - surely Alternatives exist on CF. Please check into such further. Thanks!
Upvote
0
Similar threads
