• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

Ted Cruz Engages in a Bit of Bigot-Baiting

chevyontheriver

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Sep 29, 2015
22,780
19,785
Flyoverland
✟1,364,541.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-American-Solidarity
  • Like
Reactions: BPPLEE
Upvote 0

Always in His Presence

Jesus is the only Way
Site Supporter
Nov 15, 2006
49,861
17,986
Broken Arrow, OK
✟1,052,031.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Charismatic
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
The image you showed is of a product sold (and I assume made) by a company called Judaica Place:
Yeah - old it was from years ago - I did not say it was current.
Do you have any evidence that Biden profited from this? Because they also sell Trump Vance yarmulkes:
You think they gave them away?
The yarmulke in your picture is not the campaign-branded one to which you linked. You can see the back of Biden's yarmulke when he takes and leaves the stage:
I did not say it was -

seems you fixated on Biden and missed this:

As for Sen. Cruze's observation - I completely disagree with him. Honor the man - leave his religion out of it. If it shows respect to his family - that is a kind and purposeful gesture.
 
Upvote 0

iluvatar5150

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Aug 3, 2012
29,600
29,324
Baltimore
✟769,572.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Democrat
Yeah - old it was from years ago - I did not say it was current.

You think they gave them away?

Do I really have to spell out every single piece of your own argument to you?

You claimed that Biden profited off of that branded yarmulke, but it was made and sold by somebody else and you offered no evidence whatsoever that Biden saw a dime of that money.

No, I don't think they gave away those yarmulkes, but I also don't think that they properly licensed those logos (I saw no mention on their website of licenses for either the Biden or Trump versions). I think they just copied them.


seems you fixated on Biden and missed this:

I'm fixated on Biden? You're the one who brought him up for the purpose of making a bogus charge that you didn't bother to research at all.
 
Upvote 0

Always in His Presence

Jesus is the only Way
Site Supporter
Nov 15, 2006
49,861
17,986
Broken Arrow, OK
✟1,052,031.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Charismatic
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
Do I really have to spell out every single piece of your own argument to you?
No - because your mind reading ability is, IMHO, demonstrably flawed and innacurate
You claimed that Biden profited off of that branded yarmulke, but it was made and sold by somebody else and you offered no evidence whatsoever that Biden saw a dime of that money.
No I said they used it as a fund raiser - never said who the money went to; you even said it was a product sold - seems your comprehension might be somewhat close to your mind reading.

No, I don't think they gave away those yarmulkes, but I also don't think that they properly licensed those logos (I saw no mention on their website of licenses for either the Biden or Trump versions). I think they just copied them.
There ya go - they were sold as fundraising - someone got a profit -
I'm fixated on Biden? You're the one who brought him up for the purpose of making a bogus charge that you didn't bother to research at all.
Yes you are - because you grasped onto the Biden comment like grim death. No one is attacking your hero - there is nothing to defend. I stated and and you continue to try to discredit my words by changing their meaning all the while purposley editing out the last sentence of my original post

Which - get ready - you still ready






Agrees with you.

that is my last comment to you, unless you want to address my last sentence.
 
Upvote 0

iluvatar5150

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Aug 3, 2012
29,600
29,324
Baltimore
✟769,572.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Democrat
No - because your mind reading ability is, IMHO, demonstrably flawed and innacurate

No I said they used it as a fund raiser - never said who the money went to; you even said it was a product sold - seems your comprehension might be somewhat close to your mind reading.


There ya go - they were sold as fundraising - someone got a profit -

Yes you are - because you grasped onto the Biden comment like grim death. No one is attacking your hero - there is nothing to defend. I stated and and you continue to try to discredit my words by changing their meaning all the while

Are you really unable to grasp the difference between the Biden campaign and some random clothing company? Or are you just lying and trying to walk back your earlier comments?

In post #35, you said:

Biden used it to raise money -

You didn't say "someone got a profit". You said "Biden," specifically, used it to fundraise, yet it's pretty clear that he and his campaign had nothing to do with it.

And yes, you were attacking him with that claim. In case you've forgotten what you wrote:

FYI - it is a show of respect to wear a Yarmulke in a synagogue or Jewish Holy Place

Biden used it to raise money

What you're implying by phrasing it this way is that Biden took this religious symbol that can be worn in respectful ways and cheapened it for his own profit (regardless of whether that profit went into his pocket or his campaign coffers).


purposley editing out the last sentence of my original post

Which - get ready - you still ready

Agrees with you.

I know you agreed with that part. That's why I didn't bring it up again. If we agree on something, what's to comment on?
 
Upvote 0