Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
Ephesians 6:12 (New International Version)
12For our struggle is not against flesh and blood, but against the rulers, against the authorities, against the powers of this dark world and against the spiritual forces of evil in the heavenly realms.
That distance is included in my 95% of stuff I agree with science on.
See --- you guys think I don't agree with science at all --- and this is where you're sadly mistaken.
And when you guys make those mistakes (as you will), I'll be more than happy to correct you --- over and over.
Hehe, I read up to 15 pages of this forum. I don't think you had more then 5 legitimate creation week questions.
Explain how sound can travel instantaneously from the surface of the earth, through outer space to a point at least 20 billion light years out, and be heard by an Entity --- in real time.
Third Heaven then, is farther away than I thought it was.Wikipedia said:The edge of the observable universe is now located about 46.5 billion light-years away.
Seeing as I am a literalist --- if I am going to err --- that would be the direction I would err in ---Is it possible, AV1611VET, that you've interpreted something as literal that should not be? Could your Biblical interpretation be in error here?
Man, but from what I've seen of your posts, that's a huge 5%. I mean, you've got all of these far-out explanations and constantly say, "no, the scientists are wrong," and then claim to agree with 95% of science? I think - but I'm not quite sure - that you're even debating the speed of light...and maybe the speed of sound as well...?Again --- 95% of what you guys say, I agree with.
What I disagree with --- that 5%
Let's put it this way then: I agree with 95% of the conclusions --- 116, 530 .Man, but from what I've seen of your posts, that's a huge 5%. I mean, you've got all of these far-out explanations and constantly say, "no, the scientists are wrong," and then claim to agree with 95% of science? I think - but I'm not quite sure - that you're even debating the speed of light...and maybe the speed of sound as well...?
Seeing as I am a literalist --- if I am going to err --- that would be the direction I would err in ---
--- Here we go again with this SN1987A.
This is why I qv stuff, so you guys won't read it, and I can have the honor of repeating myself.
I do not dispute the fact that this SN thing out there is 168,000 light years out.
Again --- 95% of what you guys say, I agree with.
What I disagree with --- that 5% --- is that the light from this SN that is hitting the earth, as we speak, left this object 168,000 years ago.
Any light we see --- regardless of where it is coming from --- has only been traveling for a maximum of 6100 years.
If you can't get this down, Sophophile --- believe me --- I can make it much harder.
Forget light --- that's kids stuff --- let's look at sound.
I believe in creation. Does that make me an idiot? Are you a superior being because your belief in evolution?
Why must you think that anyone who disagrees with your theory is idiotic?
<staff edit>
Why can't you just give valid explanations to your full proof evolutionary theory? Why must there be such immature and childish naming calling and insults?
It is a rare bread of evolutionists who actually know how to debate with their minds instead of their emotions.
So it's 100% or 'get out' --- right?The difference is, Av consciously ignores anything even remotely scientific, if it contradicts his religious beliefs.
That's anti-science, and has no place in the Physical and Life Sciences forum.
Then please explain to me how, if I disagree with so much science, I still manage to agree with 95% of their conclusions?You disagree with a lot more than that.
So it's 100% or 'get out' --- right?
95% agreement with science's conclusions doesn't cut it?
And yet, if it wasn't for Embedded Age, I wouldn't be saying the universe is 13.7 billiion years old.I'll have to agree with Alunyel. We've seen how you work. "Embedded age" has zero evidence to back it up and even many fellow Christians (dad included) have acknowledged it is poor theology.
TUsing the Creation Week as an example, I agree that the universe is 13.7 billion years old --- yet that isn't good enough, is it?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?