Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
Apparently it is not from what I have gathered so far.
Please, please tell me this is satire.
Apparently it is not from what I have gathered so far.
Don't worry, it IS satire. Go to the website it lists and try to preorder it. The website and the video are some kind of viral marketing for dantais inferno
Why don't you just copy and paste his posts from this thread into your new thread. I think AVET defended his Embedded Age Theory quite well here. After all, Jesus did instantly create embedded aged wine from water.I'm necroing this thread to encourage AVET to come defend Embedded Age Creationism in my new thread: http://www.christianforums.com/t7458623/
Why don't you just copy and paste his posts from this thread into your new thread. I think AVET defended his Embedded Age Theory quite well here. After all, Jesus did instantly create embedded aged wine from water.And God did instantly create an embedded aged snake from Moses' staff. Such theological evidence does add support to AVET's Embedded Age Theory.
"Theological Evidence" simply means that it is written or recorded in Scripture. If it is recorded in Scripture, then it happened.Is everything written in the Bible "theological evidence" that it really happened?
Because if it so, I'd love to get into a discussion on "theological evidence" of the Virgin Birth, but nobody ever seems to want to take me up on it.
"Theological Evidence" simply means that it is written or recorded in Scripture. If it is recorded in Scripture, then it happened.
The "Virgin Birth" is recorded in Scripture as a historical event, therefore it happened.
Scientific evidence of the "Virgin Birth" is not necessary, since there is obviously none.
Why don't you just copy and paste his posts from this thread into your new thread.
What about our falisification of Embedded Age? Like the fact that the earth has a history older than 6,000 years, which is clearly a falsification of Embedded Age, since history was not embedded, only age was.I think AVET defended his Embedded Age Theory quite well here. After all, Jesus did instantly create embedded aged wine from water.And God did instantly create an embedded aged snake from Moses' staff. Such theological evidence does add support to AVET's Embedded Age Theory.
By an Agnostic? No thanks.So what say you, Doveaman? Are you willing to put your "theological evidence" to the test?
By an Agnostic? No thanks.
I've already tested it myself personally, and I cannot help but to believe it. I can ignore it or deny it, but I cannot not believe it even if I tried not to believe it. It's too believable to be not true.
By an Agnostic? No thanks.
I've already tested it myself personally, and I cannot help but to believe it. I can ignore it or deny it, but I cannot not believe it even if I tried not to believe it. It's too believable to be not true.
The only answer that fits this poor post:
Sad Trombone
History has nothing to do with embedded age.What about our falisification of Embedded Age? Like the fact that the earth has a history older than 6,000 years, which is clearly a falsification of Embedded Age, since history was not embedded, only age was.
Nah, I just wanted to flush you out of the pocket.Did it take you almost two years to think of that, AV?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?