Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
Do you really think you can accuse scientists of telling lies about junk DNA, and then fail to reference a single lie that they have told? Really?
What a shining example of christianity you are.
Do you really think you can accuse scientists of telling lies about junk DNA, and then fail to reference a single lie that they have told? Really?
What a shining example of christianity you are.
Nothing like bearing false witness to make points...
From Time magazine....
But it turns out they were wrong. In an impressive series of more than 30 papers published in several journals, including Nature, Genome Research, Genome Biology, Science and Cell, scientists now report that these vast stretches of seeming junk DNA are actually the seat of crucial gene-controlling activity changes that contribute to hundreds of common diseases. The new data come from the Encyclopedia of DNA Elements project, or ENCODE, a $123 million endeavor begun by the National Human Genome Research Institute (NHGRI) in 2003, which includes 442 scientists in 32 labs around the world."
Well, I ain't perfect, but I ain't being controlled by no antichrist spirit either.
So there's that.
Not written by a scientist. Try again.
We all agree that non-scientist reporters get stuff wrong all of the time.
What you don't understand is that the ENCODE group used a definition for functional that includes junk DNA. Their definition for functional included anything that participated in a biochemical reaction. Junk DNA will participate in biochemical reactions in the cell, and it is still junk. They did nothing to disprove the conclusion that a massive portion of the genome is junk DNA.
Please cite real peer reviewed scientific papers, please. You claim that the scientists are wrong, so please quote what the scientists have actually written.
Then why is it that the person you call the antichrist is able to be honest about genetics and facts while you have to run away from it?
I haven't called anyone "the antichrist".
Scripturally, you're of the antichrist spirit, you're not the antichrist of scripture.
Yep, the 'not peer reviewed' dance.
That's the wild gyrations we see every time there's contrary information presented to you.
Name the specific pattern that was predicted, that doesn't follow the general rules of what was created??That is not what I said. Please try to be honest.
The prediction of what the patterns would be were made before they were measured.
We need more than a flat denial. Please explain why this is not evidence.
Some posts are forgotten before one gets through reading em.You've forgotten what prompted my comment, haven't you. Poor old dad.
Why can't you address the evidence?
Some posts are forgotten before one gets through reading em.
I use exceptionally sound logic, grounded in Scripture, that includes the knowledge of man. The issue continues to be that man's knowledge doesn't go as far as was commonly thought, and taught.Then perhaps you shouldn't feel compelled to reply to them with irrelevant drivel.
I use exceptionally sound logic, grounded in Scripture, that includes the knowledge of man. The issue continues to be that man's knowledge doesn't go as far as was commonly thought, and taught.
It is my experience that a different nature in the past fits all evidences. If we look at Egypt for example we see this holds true. Early Egypt would likely have been shortly after Babel (the time of the change of laws). Some implications of this change are much much shorter lifespans. People dying much sooner would be something that may have deeply impacted the psyche of the people living at the time. What do we see in history of the time? We see great focus on death and dying, and the dead...tombs, pyramid tombs etc. Seems to fit a changed state. What else? We see that great stones were moved in building of some structures. That fits a fundamentally different nature where it may have been mush easier to do so! We also see that early populations abandoned farming in many areas basically for some reason, if I recall, moved to other areas, and ways of life. No? If so, that fits also, because plants grew so fast in the former state, but not in this one. Changes of this sort would be required. How about the results of the populations having different tongues, rather than all the world just one language? It makes sense that they would resort to pictures to communicate, especially perhaps to those of other languages. Again, it fits the evidence!! How about the spirit god kings they record in the very early years of Egypt? That fits like a glove also, because even at Babel, they apparently had some sort of spiritual abode not all that high up from the earth. Remember the tower of Babel, where they tried to build up to it? After the nature change, apparently angels and spirits were a lot more separated from the physical plane of man!
I actually don't put truth up for grabs, or trade. If you get something to say that includes the truth and God and doesn't peddle fanatical godless belies and fables, get back to us.Your lack of interest in what anyone else has to say and your eagerness to repeat your own ideas over and over and over again is consistent with a lack of social interaction.
I actually don't put truth up for grabs, or trade. If you get something to say that includes the truth and God and doesn't peddle fanatical godless belies and fables, get back to us.
You obviously can't address the issues, but love to whine incessantly. Ho hum.
No, actually, when you post empty blather, I feel obligated to write something worthwhile in case others read it. What is lost is your defense of godless death science, and your claimed past nature. You simply have nothing to say at all about how God says the past was like and the future will be. So we see this nonsense from you.As you lost the plot in our exchange several posts ago, your default repetition of your blinkered posting technique, which I made an observation about, is rather telling.
Says the guy who admits he replies to posts he can't even remember reading.
No, actually, when you post empty blather, I feel obligated to write something worthwhile in case others read it. What is lost is your defense of godless death science, and your claimed past nature. You simply have nothing to say at all about how God says the past was like and the future will be. So we see this nonsense from you.
Try to focus on issues.
They are not all that hard to address when presented clearly and cohesively. When you expect us to harken back to some has been post you think merited glory it never got, that gets boring.
Run along now. it is best to close the thread or await poster of reason and intelligence.
Logic? scripture? was scripture written by logical people? their world was filled with demons, dragons, spirits and gods,I use exceptionally sound logic, grounded in Scripture,
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?