Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
It's worse than this: if ED's contention is correct, that the ages of the rocks are simply maturity, then he has to admit that the FOSSILS were planted there as "maturity" as well. Because there are rocks that date to millions of years old which COVER the fossils.
And there is a crater in mexico that demonstrates HISTORY, not maturity, which dates to 65 million years ago. It's an EVENT which happened 65 million years ago. It would be like Adam having a healed broken bone which he never experienced. Or a scar from an injury which never actually happened.
Evidence please?
Evidence please?
Evidence please?
You could go look at the huge crater with your own eyes.
Yes, that is all you have. Craters. How they got there is up to assumption.
EternalDragon said:Yes, that is all you have. Craters. How they got there is up to assumption.
That's right. We just assume that meteors make craters. You don't know, you were there!
1. Young sample does not always have that problem.
One more kick at the Apparent Age thing, and I'll call it a night.
http://static.bbc.co.uk/universe/img/ic/640/sights/supernovae/supernovae_large.jpg
This is a supernova remnant, ED. When stars die, they send out interstellar mass all over the place, and they look quite pretty.
I'm not good at cosmology, I'll admit, but the first problem that occurs to me is that God apparently made the universe with stars that were already in the process of dying, which seems a bit odd. But I think it's even worse than that really.
The supernova remnants span millions and millions of lightyears. There's no way they got that far out in 6,000 years - they expand, at best, at a tenth the speed of light. So, I see two explanations.
Either that interstellar mass really has been expanding for millions of years
or
God made the universe with supernova remnants...from supernovae that never actually happened...from stars that never actually existed.
Again, not a cosmologist, so someone with more expertise can correct me, but I think Occam's Razor favors the former.
It's worse than this: if ED's contention is correct, that the ages of the rocks are simply maturity, then he has to admit that the FOSSILS were planted there as "maturity" as well. Because there are rocks that date to millions of years old which COVER the fossils.
And there is a crater in mexico that demonstrates HISTORY, not maturity, which dates to 65 million years ago. It's an EVENT which happened 65 million years ago. It would be like Adam having a healed broken bone which he never experienced. Or a scar from an injury which never actually happened.
You could go look at the huge crater with your own eyes.
I would guess at the start of Noah's flood since it is dated to those sediment layers that formed during the flood.
If you go by the stated dates, yes. However the dates are incorrect. They are assumed.
I would guess at the start of Noah's flood since it is dated to those sediment layers that formed during the flood.
If you go by the stated dates, yes. However the dates are incorrect. They are assumed.
And I would see a crater hole. That is evidence that the earth took a hit at some point. I would guess at the start of Noah's flood since it is dated to those sediment layers that formed during the flood.
And I would see a crater hole. That is evidence that the earth took a hit at some point. I would guess at the start of Noah's flood since it is dated to those sediment layers that formed during the flood.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?