T-Rex blood

[UCDavis]

Speaking of T-Rex's, I doubt they are 75 millions yrs old.
Edit- #2 article is T-Rex blood.

http://www.nbcnews.com/science/weir...ted-found-75-million-year-old-fossils-n372446

 

[UCDavis]

http://www.smithsonianmag.com/science-nature/dinosaur-shocker-115306469/?no-ist

 

[Armoured]

http://www.smithsonianmag.com/science-nature/dinosaur-shocker-115306469/?no-ist

You should read the whole article. I don't think it says what you would like it to say.

 

[UCDavis]

From national geographic.

http://phenomena.nationalgeographic...-fossils-yield-possible-dinosaur-blood-cells/

 

[Armoured]

From national geographic.

http://phenomena.nationalgeographic...-fossils-yield-possible-dinosaur-blood-cells/

Ditto. Read the article. It doesn't say what you want it to say.

 

[Loudmouth]

Speaking of T-Rex's, I doubt they are 75 millions yrs old.

Why?

 

[RickG]

Speaking of T-Rex's, I doubt they are 75 millions yrs old.
Edit- #2 article is T-Rex blood.

http://www.nbcnews.com/science/weir...ted-found-75-million-year-old-fossils-n372446

None of the articles you linked support your claim doubting 75 Ma T-Rex's. Is there another reason you made the claim?