• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

Survival of the Fittest: An Interesting Side Effect of Death

sfs

Senior Member
Jun 30, 2003
10,826
7,845
65
Massachusetts
✟392,321.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
Evidence like this where even evolutionist admits there is no signs of evolution.
No, evidence like I just challenged you to respond to. Evidence I'd like to see any creationist, anywhere, address meaningfully. The "evidence" you're talking about concerns developments we have very little data about, since most of it involved soft-bodied creatures that left no fossils. Why are creationists so afraid to deal with the evidence that we do have, but prefer always to go looking for places where we don't have evidence?

And if you do want to deal with the Cambrian explosion, what's your argument, anyway? It's not like creationism predicted the appearance of many animal body plans 540 million years ago, right? Nor did it predict the appearance of those body plans tens of millions of years before land animals appeared.

"No one expected such an advanced brain would have evolved so early in the history of multicellular animals."

In another words, "Look at that. That evidence surely went against our theory so time to make up another story."
Exactly. Based on very limited information, scientists came up with an educated guess about what early animals were like, and they were wrong. So they took the radical step, when they found out they were wrong, of changing their ideas. Shocking, I know.
 
Upvote 0

Smidlee

Veteran
May 21, 2004
7,076
749
NC, USA
✟21,162.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
How do you know that if you don't even know how abiogenesis happened? See, the whole YEC agenda is one big misrepresentation after the next.
That why I wrote it goes against all known laws of physics.
We don't know how abiogenesis happen just like we don't know how to beam people up on the Enterprise or how to build Stargates to open wormholes to move to different planets in our galaxy.
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

Smidlee

Veteran
May 21, 2004
7,076
749
NC, USA
✟21,162.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
No, evidence like I just challenged you to respond to. Evidence I'd like to see any creationist, anywhere, address meaningfully. The "evidence" you're talking about concerns developments we have very little data about, since most of it involved soft-bodied creatures that left no fossils. Why are creationists so afraid to deal with the evidence that we do have, but prefer always to go looking for places where we don't have evidence?

And if you do want to deal with the Cambrian explosion, what's your argument, anyway? It's not like creationism predicted the appearance of many animal body plans 540 million years ago, right? Nor did it predict the appearance of those body plans tens of millions of years before land animals appeared.
540 miilion years is evolutionist claims the same ones that continually being surprised when the evidence fail to support their theory. What evolution like you is cherry pick a few examples which happen to fit the theory and leave out the big picture.

It seems even some atheist are starting to see the light. I'm going to have to get me a copy.
Mind and Cosmos: Why the Materialist Neo-Darwinian Conception of Nature Is Almost Certainly False: Thomas Nagel: 9780199919758: Amazon.com: Books
 
Upvote 0