Supreme Court upholds Trump's immigration ban

[Mountainmanbob]

Yes still in the United States of America the law does prevail.

M-Bob

 

[Winken]

Amazing. We need 4 new justices.

 

[Mountainmanbob]

Maybe Trump can appoint some more new justices.

Get this place straightened out after being off track for 8 years.

M-Bob

 

[ambc]

If the United States were to let in 100,000 refugees from Muslim nations where terrorism is rife and only 1% of them either supported or sympathized with ISIS, then there would be 1,000 potential terrorists in our country. That should alarm people. Trump's immigration ban is smart and could save American lives.

 

[Hank77]

Amazing. We need 4 new justices.

lol.
It was a temporary decision by the court until they actually hear the case beginning next month.

The court is expected to take up the legality of the travel ban October 10.

Supreme Court: Admin can keep travel ban on refugees - CNNPolitics

Better article...
Supreme Court justice temporarily preserves Trump refugee ban

 

[mark kennedy]

Doesn't that ban end soon? It leads one to wonder, is it going to be renewed or do they come up with something more permanent.

lol.
It was a temporary decision by the court until they actually hear the case beginning next month.

The court is expected to take up the legality of the travel ban October 10.

Supreme Court: Admin can keep travel ban on refugees - CNNPolitics

Better article...
Supreme Court justice temporarily preserves Trump refugee ban

Ok so the Supreme Court is going to hear the case after the ban expires. Has anyone in the Trump administration given any thought to what they do next?

 

[Hank77]

Doesn't that ban end soon? It leads one to wonder, is it going to be renewed or do they come up with something more permanent.



Ok so the Supreme Court is going to hear the case after the ban expires. Has anyone in the Trump administration given any thought to what they do next?

I haven't heard anything. Originally they said that the bans were 90 and 120 day bans to reevaluate the vetting process...haven't heard if they have done anything about that.

 

[mark kennedy]

I haven't heard anything. Originally they said that the bans were 90 and 120 day bans to reevaluate the vetting process...haven't heard if they have done anything about that.

It doesn't seem like a priority in this session, if it's so important to the Trump administration, I would think they would lobby tirelessly for something now.

 

[He is Risen 72]

If the United States were to let in 100,000 refugees from Muslim nations where terrorism is rife and only 1% of them either supported or sympathized with ISIS, then there would be 1,000 potential terrorists in our country. That should alarm people. Trump's immigration ban is smart and could save American lives.

However, it only takes ONE terrorist to get through to do damage. That is why we need to prevent at all costs potential terrorists from landing on our shores and threatening the Christian Citizens of our Christian Nation.

 

[Hank77]

Doesn't that ban end soon? It leads one to wonder, is it going to be renewed or do they come up with something more permanent.



Ok so the Supreme Court is going to hear the case after the ban expires. Has anyone in the Trump administration given any thought to what they do next?

The ban will continue until after the court has made a decision.

 

[Hank77]

It doesn't seem like a priority in this session, if it's so important to the Trump administration, I would think they would lobby tirelessly for something now.

They don't need to lobby anything. They simply need to tell the national security agencies to come up with a better vetting process, which Trump said he did last winter. They may have done that by now, or not.

 

[mark kennedy]

They don't need to lobby anything. They simply need to tell the national security agencies to come up with a better vetting process, which Trump said he did last winter. They may have done that by now, or not.

Guess they have a lot on their plate right now, just a game of wait and see right now. I think the Federal Courts were wanting some kind of precedence from the Supreme Court. Probably a good idea to wait and see what boundaries the Supreme Court decision includes.

 

[Hank77]

However, it only takes ONE terrorist to get through to do damage. That is why we need to prevent at all costs potential terrorists from landing on our shores and threatening the Christian Citizens of our Christian Nation.

Can you name one terrorist attack in the US, that was aimed at Christians, by a foreign entity, foreign individual, or a Muslim individual?

 

[Mountainmanbob]

911 comes to mind
MB